Are Chinese AI labs using fraudulent accounts to distill rival models?
Core argument: Anthropic said DeepSeek, MiniMax Group, and Moonshot violated its terms of service by generating more than 16 million exchanges in total with its Claude models using thousands of fraudulent accounts to "illicitly extract" results.
Anthropic said three leading artificial intelligence developers in China worked to "illicitly extract" results from its AI models to bolster the capabilities of rival products, adding to growing concerns in the US about Chinese firms improperly gaining an edge. The San Francisco-based company said DeepSeek, MiniMax Group, and Moonshot violated its terms of service by generating more than 16 million exchanges in total with its Claude models using thousands of fraudulent accounts. With this tactic, known as distillation, Chinese AI labs can rapidly improve their models by training them on the outputs from more powerful systems, Anthropic said. DeepSeek generated more than 150,000 exchanges with Claude, and MiniMax generated more than 13 million, Anthropic said, with a focus on reconstructing Claude’s more advanced capabilities. The Claude maker said it was able to pinpoint the three companies with “high confidence” based on information on internet protocol addresses, metadata and “corroboration from industry partners who observed the same actors and behaviors on their platforms.”


