Is AI behind weak employment for young workers of all education levels?
Core argument: Employment rates have declined for young adults both with and without college degrees, and those lacking degrees have endured marginally worse labor market outcomes.
It turns out that employment rates have declined for young adults both with and without degrees. If anything, those without degrees have actually endured marginally worse labor market outcomes. And similar to the trend observed in labor force participation, growth in the employment rates of young adults of all education levels have lagged behind those of all other workers. Young workers of all education levels are lagging the rest of the labor market. Focusing too much on education rather than age as the main labor market weakness starts us in the wrong direction. So is AI nonetheless to blame for the broad-based weakness in the labor market for young people? It’s true that some lower-skilled jobs can be replaced by AI. Call center workers and data entry jobs are potential examples. But there are not enough of these jobs to really drive the youth labor market. And this explanation certainly does not fit the media narrative focused on AI displacing computer science majors and entry level college graduates. The whodunnit is not about recent college graduates, but about young people of all types.

