How does AI exposure affect wage growth across experience premiums?
Core argument: For occupations with a 0% experience premium, a 1 SD increase in AI exposure is associated with a 0.28 percentage point reduction in post-2022 wage growth, with a clearly negative confidence interval.
Chart 5 presents the estimated effect of a one-standard-deviation (1 SD) increase in an occupation’s AI exposure on an occupation’s post-2022 wage growth. For occupations with the median experience premium (40%), a 1 SD increase in AI exposure is associated with a 0.05ppt decline in wage growth. The 90% confidence interval for this estimate clearly includes zero, indicating that for an occupation with the median experience premium, AI exposure doesn’t much affect wage growth. However, for an occupation with a 0% experience premium, increased AI exposure is associated with a 0.28 percentage point reduction in wage growth. The confidence interval for this estimate is clearly negative. For occupations with a very low experience premium, AI exposure has a more negative effect on wage growth since AI substitutes for both entry and experienced workers. The low experience premium suggests there is not much tacit knowledge required for the occupation, so experienced workers are easily substituted by AI. Conversely, for occupations in the 90th percentile of the experience premium distribution, increased AI exposure is associated with a 0.2 percentage point increase in wage growth. For these occupations, AI exposure has less of a negative effect, and likely even a positive effect on wages, as AI substitutes for entry level workers but complements experienced workers.

