Financial Markets

Research and data on interest rates, bonds, equities, credit, risk premiums, corporate profits, and investor expectations. The archive examines what market prices reveal about growth, inflation, policy, and financial conditions.

AI Summary. A global bond sell-off pushed long-term borrowing costs in the US, Europe and the UK to their highest levels in decades, with the 30-year US Treasury yield reaching 5.73%, its highest since 2002. Investors cited concerns over inflation and high public debt burdens, with French and Italian yields also rising.

Date Posted:

The US 10-year Treasury yield fell to 5.29% from 5.36% after strong auction demand. The 30-year yield rose to as high as 5.73%, its highest level since 2002, before settling at 5.66%.

Are inflation and debt worries pushing long-term yields to decades-highs?

Core argument: The 30-year US Treasury yield rose as much as 0.09 percentage points to 5.73%, its highest level since 2002, before easing to 5.66% following a strong 10-year Treasury auction.

A sell-off in US government bonds eased after an auction of 10-year Treasuries drew strong demand in a sign that investors were seeking to lock in the highest yields since the turn of the millennium. US 10-year Treasury yields, a benchmark for borrowing costs in the world’s biggest economy, climbed as high as 5.36% in volatile trading early on Wednesday. But yields fell back sharply after a $39bn auction went smoothly, with the 10-year recently trading at 5.29%. France’s 10-year borrowing costs rose to 4.87%, heading back towards the post-2002 high reached this month, amid persistent worries that the Eurozone’s second-biggest economy was heading for a debt reckoning.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. The 30-year US Treasury yield rose as much as 0.09 percentage points to 5.73%, its highest level since 2002, before easing to 5.66% following a strong 10-year Treasury auction.
  2. A global bond sell-off pushed long-term borrowing costs in the US, Europe and the UK back to their highest levels in decades, as fears over inflation and high public debt burdens rattled investors.
  3. French and Italian government bond yields each rose more than 0.1 percentage points, extending a series of wild swings in European government debt markets.

AI Summary. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index rose as much as 0.5% alongside oil prices following a pickup in Iranian attacks on vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, approaching a new peak for the year. Nearly all Group of 10 currencies weakened against the dollar, with the euro lagging all its major peers.

Date Posted:

The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index is approaching a record high for the year as political risk from France weighs on the euro, though it remains ~4% under its pre-Liberation Day level.

Does rising shipping conflict strengthen the dollar against major currencies?

Core argument: The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index rose as much as 0.5%, approaching a new peak for the year, alongside a rise in oil after a pickup in Iranian attacks on vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.

The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index rose as much as 0.5% alongside oil after a pickup in Iranian attacks on vessels in the Strait of Hormuz. The gauge is approaching a new peak this year. Nearly all currencies in the Group of 10 have weakened against the greenback, with the euro lagging behind all its major peers.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index rose as much as 0.5%, approaching a new peak for the year, alongside a rise in oil after a pickup in Iranian attacks on vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.
  2. Nearly all Group of 10 currencies weakened against the dollar, with the euro lagging all of its major peers.

AI Summary. Large US cloud and artificial-intelligence companies have raised $48bn in European-currency bonds, more than triple the prior year's total, spread across €27bn, £13bn and CHF7.5bn. The issuance adds highly rated US borrowers to European credit indices and deepens the thin market for longer-dated maturities, with few signs so far of crowding out other issuers.

Date Posted:

Hyperscalers have raised $48B in European-currency bonds this year, more than 3x all of 2025. They now account for 3% of euro IG issuance, 10% of sterling and 22% of Swiss franc, versus 8% in the US.

Are European bond markets funding the US AI buildout?

Core argument: Hyperscalers have raised $48 billion in bonds denominated in European currencies this year — €27 billion, £13 billion and CHF7.5 billion — more than triple the full-year 2025 total.

Hyperscalers have raised $48 billion in bonds in European currencies this year, already more than triple the entire amount raised last year. This breaks down as €27 billion, £13 billion, and CHF 7.5 billion. There are few signs of crowding out: non-hyperscaler IG issuance remains strong and little changed YoY, and corporate spreads remain tight. Rather, hyperscalers are adding highly rated US borrowers (AA- or higher) to European credit indices that have traditionally had more A-to-BBB exposure. Hyperscalers account for 7% of euro issuance with maturities of 10 years or more, versus 3% across all maturities, and 3% of the 10-year-plus euro IG index versus 1% of the overall index. This adds depth at longer-dated maturities—thin outside sovereign issuance—at a time when some governments, including the UK, have been shortening duration.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Hyperscalers have raised $48 billion in bonds denominated in European currencies this year — €27 billion, £13 billion and CHF7.5 billion — more than triple the full-year 2025 total.
  2. Hyperscaler issuance shows few signs so far of crowding out European borrowers, with non-hyperscaler investment-grade issuance little changed year-over-year and corporate spreads still tight.
  3. Hyperscalers account for 7% of euro issuance with maturities of 10 years or more versus 3% across all maturities, adding borrowers rated AA- or higher to indices traditionally weighted toward A to BBB.

AI Summary. The 10-year US Treasury yield has risen past its 2007 high to its highest level since 2002, with the latest move driven by a US services survey showing services inflation proving intractable. The share of supply managers reporting rising prices climbed to its highest level since the post-pandemic surge.

Date Posted:

The US 10-year Treasury yield is at its highest level since 2002. Authers notes: “A move of this magnitude should be a problem for equities. It hasn’t been…. On the face of it, the big tech companies are proving immune to the rising cost of money” likely due to rapidly growing earnings.

Are rising long-term bond yields driven by stubborn services inflation?

Core argument: The 10-year Treasury yield has broken above its 2007 high, the year a bond sell-off triggered the Global Financial Crisis, reaching its highest level since 2002.

The 10-year Treasury yield has now broken through its high from 2007, when a bond sell-off triggered the Global Financial Crisis. It’s now the highest since 2002. The latest impulse upward came from the ISM Services report for the US. Services inflation is proving intractable, and the proportion of supply managers complaining about rising prices climbed to its highest since the post-pandemic surge. With the exception of a few months at the top of the oil price spike in 2008, and in the brief spasm that followed Hurricane Katrina in 2005, the reading is the strongest since the series began in 1997.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. The 10-year Treasury yield has broken above its 2007 high, the year a bond sell-off triggered the Global Financial Crisis, reaching its highest level since 2002.
  2. The ISM Services report drove the latest upward move in yields, with services inflation proving intractable and the share of supply managers reporting rising prices climbing to its highest since the post-pandemic surge.
  3. Apart from a few months at the peak of the 2008 oil price spike and the brief episode after Hurricane Katrina in 2005, the ISM Services prices reading is the strongest since the series began in 1997.

AI Summary. Canada's core inflation is around 2% and its budget deficit about 2.4%, versus roughly 6% in the US, yet Canadian bond yields move with US yields. The author argues global AI-related debt issuance, including multibillion-dollar Canadian-dollar bonds from Google and Amazon, helps transmit higher US borrowing costs into Canada.

Date Posted:

Canada’s 10-year yield rose from ~3% to ~4% despite a modest 2.4% budget deficit, slow domestic growth and 2% core inflation. Podolsky sees the US bond selloff as raising yields globally. “It can seem odd that bond markets trade in sync, but they do.”

Are US borrowing costs being exported to Canada through global AI debt?

Core argument: Canada’s core CPI runs near 2% and its budget deficit near 2.4%, versus roughly 6% in the US, which the author attributes to Canada not being a meaningful part of the AI boom.

Core CPI in Canada is around 2%. This is because Canada is not a meaningful part of the AI boom and is also not running a big budget deficit. Canada’s budget deficit is around 2.4%, as opposed to about 6% in the US. Canada’s bond-market reward for the US’s truculent, guns-and-butter policy is higher borrowing costs and slower growth. In part this is because the AI debt issuance is global. In May, Google raised C$8.5B and in June Amazon raised C$14B, or about one-third of net new Canadian corporate issuance this year. Over time, however, markets often revert to pricing that accurately reflects local conditions. [The chart shows] yields in the US, Canada, and Canadian unemployment. As you can see, as US yields sell off, Canada sells off, even if Canadian employment conditions are tepid. Obviously, the US (orange line) has sold off more.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Canada’s core CPI runs near 2% and its budget deficit near 2.4%, versus roughly 6% in the US, which the author attributes to Canada not being a meaningful part of the AI boom.
  2. Canadian bond yields sell off alongside US yields even when Canadian employment conditions are tepid, leaving Canada with higher borrowing costs and slower growth, though US yields have sold off more.
  3. Google raised C$8.5B in May and Amazon C$14B in June, together about one-third of net new Canadian corporate issuance this year, reflecting the global nature of AI-related debt issuance.

AI Summary. French government borrowing costs now exceed the country's nominal income growth by about 2 percentage points, the most unfavorable gap between borrowing costs and growth in the rich world. By contrast, Spanish and Greek bond yields remain about 2 percentage points below their income growth rates.

Date Posted:

The change in a country’s interest rate, Klein argues, should be measured against the change in nominal income growth. By that metric, France has moved from “core Europe” into the periphery – while Italy, Spain and especially Greece have moved in the opposite direction.

Do French borrowing costs now exceed its income growth?

Core argument: France’s borrowing costs exceeded its nominal income growth rate by about 2pp as of 2026Q2, and by roughly 3pp at current yields, the most unfavorable such spread in the rich world.

The problem for France is that its bond yields are surging even as its nominal income growth has slowed relative to the 2017-2019 pace, to the point that, almost uniquely among rich countries, borrowing costs there now substantially exceed growth rates. In fact, the spread between French sovereign borrowing costs and French growth rates is now the most unfavorable anywhere in the rich world. The French economy was not quite growing by 2% a year in euro terms as of 2026Q2, which was even worse than the anemic 3% yearly average nominal growth rate recorded in 2017Q1-2019Q4. As of 2026Q2, France’s cost of borrowing was therefore about 2pp higher than its income growth rate. (At current yields, the penalty is more like 3pp.) By contrast, Spanish and Greek bond yields are still about 2pp lower than their income growth rates.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. France’s borrowing costs exceeded its nominal income growth rate by about 2pp as of 2026Q2, and by roughly 3pp at current yields, the most unfavorable such spread in the rich world.
  2. French nominal growth was running just under 2% a year in euro terms as of 2026Q2, below the 3% yearly average recorded in 2017Q1–2019Q4, even as French bond yields surged.
  3. Spanish and Greek bond yields remain about 2pp below their nominal income growth rates, in contrast to France’s unfavorable gap.

AI Summary. The gap between French and German 10-year government bond yields exceeded 140 basis points, up from 40–50 basis points, which the author attributes to political choices favoring pensioners over bondholders, including a suspended pension reform leaving the minimum retirement age near 62. French over-65s hold higher average incomes than working-age people.

Date Posted:

France has signaled that pensioners are the senior claimants on government revenues. In 2026, private investors must absorb net bond issuance equal to 7.5% of GDP, after years when ECB purchases exceeded issuance.

Why has France's borrowing cost gap with Germany widened?

Core argument: The French OAT-Bund 10-year spread exceeded 140 basis points in mid-2025, up from 40–50 basis points between 2022 and June 2024, which Lustig attributes to political decisions prioritizing pensioners over bondholders.

France’s 10-year spread over Germany has risen above 140bp, from 40–50bp before mid-2024. France has repeatedly signaled that pensioners are senior claimants on government revenues: pension reforms have been weakened or reversed, while governments trying to restrain pension spending have fallen. The minimum retirement age is now 62 years and 9 months, and French over-65s have higher average incomes than the working-age population. Meanwhile, ECB purchases exceeded French net bond issuance in five years from 2015–22, so private investors were net sellers of French bonds; in 2026 they must absorb net issuance equal to 7.5% of GDP. The 10-year (r-g) gap has swung from −3.9pp in October 2020 to +1.9pp. French insurers and pension funds’ share of negotiable government debt has fallen from about 25% in 2014 to under 11%, while nonresidents’ share has risen to 57.5%.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. The French OAT-Bund 10-year spread exceeded 140 basis points in mid-2025, up from 40–50 basis points between 2022 and June 2024, which Lustig attributes to political decisions prioritizing pensioners over bondholders.
  2. France’s legal minimum retirement age remains frozen at 62 years and 9 months for men — the lowest in the Eurozone except Bulgaria — after Prime Minister Lecornu suspended the 2023 pension reform, and French over-65s hold higher average incomes than the working-age population.
  3. French insurers and pension funds’ share of France’s negotiable state debt fell from about 25% in 2014 to under 11%, non-residents hold 57.5% of OATs, and private investors are projected to absorb 7.5% of GDP in net issuance in 2026.

AI Summary. Japan, China, South Korea and Taiwan together hold just under $30tn in gross foreign assets, a five-fold rise over two decades, and about $10tn in net foreign assets. The author argues a current account surplus dominated by investment income, which tends to be reinvested abroad, generates less currency appreciation pressure than one driven by trade.

Date Posted:

Northeast Asia’s ~$10T in net foreign assets would yield $400B annually at 4%, versus its ~$600B mean current-account surplus. Unlike export earnings, much investment income is reinvested abroad, creating less appreciation pressure.

Does investment income create less currency appreciation pressure than trade surpluses?

Core argument: Japan, China, South Korea and Taiwan together hold just under $30tn in gross foreign assets, a five-fold increase over the past two decades, with net foreign assets of about $10tn after liabilities to foreigners.

Japan, China, South Korea and Taiwan now hold nearly US10T net. At a 4% return, those net assets would generate roughly $600B over the past decade. The composition matters for exchange rates: exporters typically convert more of their foreign earnings into local currency to meet domestic costs, while foreign investment income is more likely to be reinvested abroad. A current-account surplus increasingly driven by investment income therefore creates less appreciation pressure than an equivalent trade surplus.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Japan, China, South Korea and Taiwan together hold just under $30tn in gross foreign assets, a five-fold increase over the past two decades, with net foreign assets of about $10tn after liabilities to foreigners.
  2. At the current 4% federal funds rate, $10tn of net foreign assets would imply roughly $400bn a year in net investment income for the four Northeast Asian economies, against a combined current account surplus averaging about $600bn over the last decade.
  3. A current account surplus dominated by investment income generates less appreciation pressure than one dominated by trade, as exporters are more likely to repatriate and convert dollar earnings to cover domestic input costs while investment-income earners are more likely to reinvest abroad.