Are H-1B workers underpaid relative to comparable native-born workers?
Core argument: Correcting for errors leaves an average H-1B wage gap only one-third as large as the Borjas analysis claimed, with a consistent geographic definition for both groups reducing the gap to 5.3%.
[Whether] H-1Bs are underpaid depends on which workers we examine. [Older] H-1B workers earn less than otherwise similar native-born workers, while [younger] H-1B workers earn more. [Overall, there is a] small average wage gap, [but it is] only one-third as large as the [Borjas] analysis claimed. [The above table] provides a step-by-step breakdown of how these errors manufactured the appearance of a large wage gap. The [most significant mistake] is a temporal mismatch between his H-1B and native-born samples: the H-1B applications span 2020–2023, while the ACS data [covers] just 2023. [Given] 15.1 percent inflation and [an] 18.7% wage increase for software occupations [from 2020 to 2023], comparing [wages of] H-1B workers [2020 to 2023 to] native-born [wages from 2023] overstates the wage gap, effectively comparing 2020 wages with 2023 prices. [Second], Borjas compares H-1B workers’ place of work to natives’ place of residence. [Using] a consistent definition of geography for both groups further reduces the gap to 5.3%. [Even after corrections], the aggregate average hides that younger H-1B workers are paid [more than Americans], while older H-1B workers are paid [less]. [H-1B workers ages 21–22] earn a 20% wage premium [over natives]. [After age 34], a negative wage gap emerges. Two-thirds of H-1B lottery winners are 33 or younger…the very group that earns a significant wage premium over natives.

