Edward Conard

Top Ten New York Times Bestselling Author

  • “…a comprehensive explanation of the modern economy.” - Julian Robertson, Founder, Tiger Management
  • “…serious thinking for serious thinkers. …a thought-provoking blueprint for growing middle- and working-class incomes.” - Mitt Romney, former Governor of Massachusetts
  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • “A full-throated defense of economic dynamism.” - The Wall Street Journal
  • “…a must-read for serious students of economic policy.” - Glenn Hubbard, Dean, Columbia Business School, and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “Unintended Consequences is full of substance, it is one of the must-read books of the year, and once I finish it I will be giving it a second read through right away.” - Tyler Cowen, Professor, George Mason University
  • “Unintended Consequences should be read by anyone who takes for granted the superiority of progressive taxation and has not thought carefully about the trade-offs involved.” - The New Republic
  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • “…a very valuable contribution.” - Larry Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury and director of the National Economic Council, president emeritus, Harvard University
  • “…reminds us that inequality sends a signal of what society lacks most, in America’s case, entrepreneurship and risk taking.” - Lawrence Lindsey, CEO, The Lindsey Group, former Director of the National Economic Council
  • “Unintended Consequences represents the most cogent and persuasive analysis of the Financial Crisis to date.” - Andrei Shleifer, 1999 John Bates Clark Medal Winner
Upside of Inequality Oxford Unintended Consequences

AI Summary. Periods of high immigration to America have tended to be followed by restrictions, including the 1882 ban on Chinese laborers and 1924 quotas that capped European arrivals and barred Asian immigration. Those quotas suppressed immigration for 40 years, and the foreign-born share of the population fell to about 5% by 1970.

Economist Staff Economist
Date Posted:
Is Database:
Database

At 15.8%, the foreign-born population of the US is above its ~15% previous peak in 1890. That prior peak gave way under immigration restrictions such as the Chinese Exclusion Act (1882) and the Immigration Act of 1924.

Do periods of high immigration tend to be followed by restrictions?

Core argument: America's foreign-born population share reached nearly 15% in 1890, a threshold not surpassed again until the mid-2020s, before falling to around 5% by 1970.

After periods of high immigration, restrictions have tended to follow. In 1890 the foreign-born share of America’s population reached nearly 15% (a threshold that would not be surpassed until the mid 2020s). The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 banned Chinese labourers from immigrating to America for ten years, the first federal law to restrict immigration explicitly based on race or nationality. In 1924 Congress capped annual arrivals from Europe to just 2% of each nationality’s population residing in America at the time of the 1890 census, and banned immigration from Asia outright. These quotas suppressed immigration for 40 years and prevented America from accepting thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing Nazi Europe. By 1970 America’s foreign-born population had fallen to around 5%.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. America's foreign-born population share reached nearly 15% in 1890, a threshold not surpassed again until the mid-2020s, before falling to around 5% by 1970.
  2. Congress in 1924 capped annual European arrivals at 2% of each nationality's population residing in America at the 1890 census and banned Asian immigration outright, suppressing immigration for 40 years and preventing America from accepting thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing Nazi Europe.
  3. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 barred Chinese labourers from immigrating to America for ten years, the first federal law to restrict immigration explicitly on the basis of race or nationality.

Related Articles:

  • The Demographic Outlook: 2026 to 2056 — The Congressional Budget Office projects the US population rises from 349m to 364m between 2026 and 2056, with annual growth slowing from 0.3% over the next decade to 0.1% thereafter before reaching zero and then shrinking. Declining fertility is projected to push deaths above births starting in 2030, increasingly offsetting net immigration.
  • U.S. Unauthorized Immigrant Population Reached a Record 14 Million in 2023 — Pew Research Center estimates the U.S. unauthorized immigrant population reached an all-time high of 14m in 2023, or 4.1% of the total population, after a record two-year increase of 3.5m. The overall immigrant population peaked above 53m before declining by more than 1m in the first half of 2025.
  • Switzerland To Vote On Plan To Cap Population At 10mn — Switzerland will vote on a proposal to cap its population at 10mn, a limit that could jeopardize agreements with the European Union and restrict companies' access to skilled foreign workers. The population stands at 9.1mn, foreign residents make up 27% of the total, and the population has grown about 25% since 2000.
Showing 69 database articles primarily about Immigration