![“China possesses scale, and the [US] does not.” @RushDoshi argues the US can balance China only by “transforming its...](https://i0.wp.com/www.edwardconard.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/logo-foreign-affairs.png?fit=320%2C160&ssl=1){kind=logo}
How can the US match China's manufacturing scale?
Core argument: China's productive capacity is three times that of the United States and exceeds that of the next nine countries combined, which the article calls a decisive advantage in military and technological competition.
China’s productive capacity is three times as large as that of the United States—a decisive advantage in military and technological competition—and exceeds that of the next nine countries combined. In the two decades after China joined the World Trade Organization, its share of global manufacturing quintupled to 30% while the U.S. share halved to roughly 15%; the United Nations has estimated that, by 2030, the imbalance will grow to 45% and 11%. China leads in many traditional industries—producing 20x as much cement, 13x as much steel, three times as many cars, and twice as much power as the United States—and increasingly in advanced sectors as well. To achieve scale, Washington must transform its alliance architecture from a collection of managed relationships to a platform for integrated and pooled capacity building across the military, economic, and technological domains. In practical terms, that might mean Japan and Korea help build American ships and Taiwan builds American semiconductor plants while the United States shares its best military technology with allies, and all come together to pool their markets behind a shared tariff or regulatory wall erected against China.