Do alternative inflation measures tell a different story than headline figures?
Core argument: Alternative inflation gauges — the BLS CPI excluding food, energy, shelter, and used cars and trucks, the Cleveland Fed's trimmed measure, and the Atlanta Fed's sticky-price CPI excluding shelter — tell a similar story that differs from headline CPI figures.
The BLS publishes a version of the CPI that excludes food, energy, shelter (housing+hotels, mostly), and used cars and trucks. The Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland has a measure that recalculates the monthly change in the CPI excluding the components with the largest price increases and largest price decreases. The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta divides the CPI into two groups based on whether prices change frequently or not. They also publish versions of their “sticky-price” CPI excluding shelter. Another approach is simply to focus on select components that ought to be representative of the broader whole, such as “full service meals and snacks”, or “personal care services” (mostly haircuts). Tellingly, all of these measures tend to tell a similar story regarding inflation over the past few years—and this story is very different from what the headline figures have been showing, thanks to the impact of housing.

