Do voters and mainstream politicians diverge on culture but not economics?
Core argument: Guenther's analysis finds voters and mainstream politicians broadly aligned on economic issues such as tax and spend or public ownership, but divided by a yawning gulf on sociocultural issues like immigration and criminal justice.
Guenther’s analysis shows that voters and mainstream politicians have long been broadly aligned on economic issues like tax and spend or public ownership. But on sociocultural issues such as immigration and criminal justice there is a yawning gulf. Western publics have long desired greater emphasis on order, control and cultural integration. Their politicians have tilted in the opposite direction, favouring more inclusive and permissive approaches. Extending Guenther’s European analysis to include more recent data and a wider set of countries, I find the thesis aligns well with several recent developments. First, the same pattern is visible in the US, where the average voter’s preferences on immigration are close to those of Republican politicians, but far more conservative than those of Democratic party elites.

