Edward Conard

Top Ten New York Times Bestselling Author

  • “…a must-read for serious students of economic policy.” - Glenn Hubbard, Dean, Columbia Business School, and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
  • “…reminds us that inequality sends a signal of what society lacks most, in America’s case, entrepreneurship and risk taking.” - Lawrence Lindsey, CEO, The Lindsey Group, former Director of the National Economic Council
  • “Unintended Consequences provides a provocative interpretation of the causes of the global financial crisis and the policies needed to return to rapid growth. Whether you agree or not, this analysis is well worth reading.” - Nouriel Roubini, New York University; Chairman, Roubini Global Economics
  • “…serious thinking for serious thinkers. …a thought-provoking blueprint for growing middle- and working-class incomes.” - Mitt Romney, former Governor of Massachusetts
  • “Unintended Consequences represents the most cogent and persuasive analysis of the Financial Crisis to date.” - Andrei Shleifer, 1999 John Bates Clark Medal Winner
  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “Unintended Consequences is far smarter and more thought-provoking than most economics written for the general public” - Greg Mankiw, Harvard University, Former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors
  • “Unintended Consequences is full of substance, it is one of the must-read books of the year, and once I finish it I will be giving it a second read through right away.” - Tyler Cowen, Professor, George Mason University
  • “There are an amazing number of good ideas and interesting points made in Unintended Consequences. The thinking underlying it, and the obvious depth of understanding of the author, are very impressive.” - Steven Levitt, coauthor of Freakonomics; 2004 John Bates Clark Medal
  • “Unintended Consequences offers deep and well-argued analyses on almost every issue.” - The New York Times
  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Upside of Inequality Oxford Unintended Consequences

AI Summary. Zero-sum thinking — viewing gains for one group as losses for another — is associated with greater support for liberal economic policies, stronger alignment with the Democratic Party, and weaker alignment with the Republican Party. The authors also find it linked to believing the QAnon conspiracy theory holds some truth and to sympathy for the attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Sahil Chinoy, Nathan Nunn, Sandra Sequeira and Stefanie Stantcheva National Bureau of Economic Research
Date Posted:
Is Database:
Database
Is Important:
Important

Zero-sum thinking in terms of political and policy views is strongly associated with lower levels of intergenerational upward mobility. @S_Stantcheva @DrNathanNunn

How does zero-sum thinking shape political views and party alignment?

Core argument: Zero-sum thinking is associated with greater preference for liberal economic policies, stronger alignment with the Democratic Party, and weaker alignment with the Republican Party.

Zero-sum thinking is associated with more preference for liberal economic policies in general and with stronger political alignment with the Democratic Party and weaker alignment with the Republican Party. We also find that zero-sum thinking is linked empirically to important political crises experienced in the United States. Specifically, we find that individuals who view the world in zero-sum terms are more likely to believe that the conspiracy theory QAnon holds some truth for U.S. politics. We also find that zero-sum thinking is linked with empathy and understanding for the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol Building, an act that is more justifiable and seen as being less harmful if one presumes the world is zero-sum (rather than positive/negative sum).

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Zero-sum thinking is associated with greater preference for liberal economic policies, stronger alignment with the Democratic Party, and weaker alignment with the Republican Party.
  2. Individuals who view the world in zero-sum terms are more likely to believe the QAnon conspiracy theory holds some truth for U.S. politics.
  3. Zero-sum thinking is linked with empathy and understanding for the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, an act seen as more justifiable and less harmful if one presumes the world is zero-sum.

Related Articles:

  • Are We Destined For A Zero-Sum Future? — Survey data show average views in high-income countries have become 20% more zero-sum — the belief that people get rich only at others' expense — over the past century, with two rises in zero-sum attitudes coinciding with growth slowdowns in the 1970s and the past two decades.
  • Is the Surge to the Left Among Young Voters a Trump Blip or the Real Deal? — Data from the Cooperative Election Study show millennials and Gen Z have voted increasingly for Democratic House candidates over time, contrary to the adage that voters grow more conservative as they age. One political scientist notes such generational shifts translate slowly into vote share and can be offset by Republican gains elsewhere.
  • Millennials are Shattering the Oldest Rule in Politics — British "silent generation" and baby boomers grew more conservative with age, and Gen X is following the same path, but millennials, born 1981-1996, diverged from that trajectory. The most likely explanation is a cohort effect, with US survey data showing millennials favoring greater redistribution from rich to poor than earlier generations.
Showing 187 database articles primarily about Politics