Does housing construction volatility predict stock and bond market volatility?
Core argument: Volatility in residential building permit growth predicts aggregate and cross-sectional stock and corporate bond return volatility, according to a hand-collected century-long database of monthly permit quantities and valuations for all U.S. states and the 60 largest MSAs.
Does the housing market lead the financial cycle? We address this question by creating a new hand-collected database spanning a century of monthly building permit quantities and valuations for all U.S. states and the 60 largest MSAs. We show that the option to build embedded in permits renders volatility in residential building permit growth (BPG) a strong predictor of aggregate and cross-sectional stock and corporate bond return volatility. This predictability remains even after conditioning on a battery of factors, including corporate and household leverage [thus arising] independently of the credit cycle] and firms’ exposure through their network of plants to other localized physical risks like natural disasters conditional on measures of corporate and household leverage and debt service ratios. Cities and states with more elastic housing supply consistently predict financial market downturns at 12-month horizons, resulting in new trading strategies to hedge against overbuilding risk.

