Top Ten New York Times Bestselling Author
AI Summary. US corporate investment in equipment and facilities is projected to grow 40% in real terms by the end of next year, versus 12% in the euro area, widening a productivity gap where output per hour worked rose $14 in the US compared with $2 in Europe since 2018.
Sam Fleming, Amy Borrett and Olaf Storbeck Financial TimesCore argument: U.S. corporate investment in equipment and facilities is projected to rise 40% in real terms between 2021 and end-2026, versus 12% in the euro area and near-zero growth in Germany, sharply widening the transatlantic capital-spending gap.
Corporate spending on new equipment and facilities in the US is projected to increase 40% in real terms between 2021 and the end of next year, according to forecasts from Oxford Economics. The US surge compared with a real-terms increase of just 12% in the euro area, while German business investment is expected to have all but stagnated over the same period. Europe also faces a large and growing productivity gap with the US. “The United States has recently pulled further ahead of Europe,” Bart van Ark, a professor at the University of Manchester, told policymakers at the ECB Forum in Sintra. GDP per hour worked increased $14 in the US between 2018 and 2025, compared with just $2 in Europe. “The gap is not only a digital sector story,” added van Ark, stressing that the US outperformance extended to other sectors, including wholesale and retail as well as professional services.AI Summary. Nine major technology companies carry ~$3tn in off-balance-sheet AI commitments — 5x their ~$600bn in reported capital spending — obligations that are growing faster than traditional investment and triple their combined lease and debt liabilities.
Peter Rudegeair and Peter Santilli Wall Street JournalAI Summary. Heavy corporate bond issuance driven by AI investment has reduced demand for long-term government debt, pushing 10-year Treasury yields up ~0.3 percentage points as investors rotate into higher-yielding corporate bonds.
Davide Barbuscia, Ye Xie, and Michael MacKenzie BloombergAI Summary. Combined capital spending by Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta on AI infrastructure has exceeded $1.1tn since 2023, with executives warning that continued investment will reduce the cash available to repay debt or return money to shareholders.
Ryan McMorrow, Rafe Rosner-Uddin and Hannah Murphy Financial TimesAI Summary. Rising US labor productivity is driven by higher capital utilization—factories, servers, and hotel rooms running harder—rather than new investment or efficiency gains at the individual task level.
Ernie Tedeschi Stripe EconomicsCore argument: Capital utilization and capital deepening are distinct mechanisms, but firms pushing existing assets harder typically accelerate capex simultaneously, linking near-term utilization gains to longer-run investment cycles.
What appears to be lifting US labor productivity, rather than microproductivity gains, are macroproductivity gains from AI—specifically companies running their existing capital harder. Think longer runs of factories already built, more utilization of server racks and GPU clusters already paid for, and more occupancy of existing hotel rooms. Economists call this “capital intensity” or “utilization.” Higher capital utilization represents real economic gains, but it’s not the same as microproductivity. This is not the same as “capital deepening” (growth in measured productivity from expanding capital supply—for example, through capital investment). What the current numbers do not yet support is the claim that this transmission is already well underway at the aggregate level: adoption is too thin, the cross-sectional signal is too weak, downstream bottlenecks remain, and the productivity pickup is too attributable to utilization to be confident in that conclusion. Instead, the acceleration we’re seeing so far is largely a result of companies trying to meet the demand for AI capacity by pushing the limits of their existing infrastructure.AI Summary. AI investment is crowding out rival capital projects by absorbing scarce physical inputs—grid capacity, construction labor, metals, and engineering talent—while semiconductor prices surge where supply constraints meet surging demand. With hyperscaler free cash flow exhausted, over 80% of future AI capital spending requires external financing, including fresh equity issuance.
Jason Thomas CarlyleCore argument: Tech capex surged 30% vs. year-ago while non-tech investment fell, driving a 56 pts outperformance of semiconductor stocks over hyperscaler.
Overall tech-related investment increased 30% from year-ago levels, while all other capex fell. This record divergence implies that the AI boom is bidding away physical inputs – electricians, grid capacity and transformers, metals and materials, engineering talent, and construction labor – in quantities that stress the economics of rival projects elsewhere. Perhaps the best illustration of binding real resource constraints was observed inside the AI data center complex itself. In the first half of the year, the average price of semiconductors, labor for assembly and integration, and related materials exploded, as physical supply constraints interacted with insatiable demand. As more economic rent accrued to the compute layer, the stock prices of the semiconductor manufacturers upstream from this physical chokepoint outperformed those of their top customers by 56%. When AI spending gets financed out of internally generated cash flow, “crowding out” isn’t a pressing issue for investors. Credit spreads have not widened materially, financing conditions remain accommodative, and the cost of capital for non-software borrowers doesn’t suggest displacement. But the hyperscalers’ free cash flow has now been exhausted. Over 80% of the projected capex over the next few years will have to be externally financed, including fresh equity issuance.