Edward Conard

Top Ten New York Times Bestselling Author

  • “…a very valuable contribution.” - Larry Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury and director of the National Economic Council, president emeritus, Harvard University
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “Unintended Consequences is far smarter and more thought-provoking than most economics written for the general public” - Greg Mankiw, Harvard University, Former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors
  • “Unintended Consequences is full of substance, it is one of the must-read books of the year, and once I finish it I will be giving it a second read through right away.” - Tyler Cowen, Professor, George Mason University
  • “A full-throated defense of economic dynamism.” - The Wall Street Journal
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “…a comprehensive explanation of the modern economy.” - Julian Robertson, Founder, Tiger Management
  • “There are an amazing number of good ideas and interesting points made in Unintended Consequences. The thinking underlying it, and the obvious depth of understanding of the author, are very impressive.” - Steven Levitt, coauthor of Freakonomics; 2004 John Bates Clark Medal
  • “…a must-read for serious students of economic policy.” - Glenn Hubbard, Dean, Columbia Business School, and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
  • “Unintended Consequences represents the most cogent and persuasive analysis of the Financial Crisis to date.” - Andrei Shleifer, 1999 John Bates Clark Medal Winner
  • “…a very valuable contribution.” - Larry Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury and director of the National Economic Council, president emeritus, Harvard University
  • “Unintended Consequences offers deep and well-argued analyses on almost every issue.” - The New York Times
Upside of Inequality Oxford Unintended Consequences
Buy the Books
  • Macro Roundup
  • About Roundup
  • About Ed Conard
  • Highlights
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
Edward Conard
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • youtube
  • Email
  • Text Message (SMS)
  • Twitter/X
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp Message
Subscribe to Macro Roundup Emails
  • Mentions 113
  • Primary focus 11
Showing 11 database articles primarily about Science
Currently filtering by:
  • Remove Science
  • Remove "primary topics only" restriction
  • Remove 'Database'
Show all 7,315 articles
For whatever topics you select (currently: Science):
Choose search scope

Your importance filter 'Database' shows fewer articles.

Remove filters to see full article counts

US Finds First Severe Bird Flu Case; California Calls Emergency

AI Summary. A Louisiana resident hospitalized with avian influenza is the first severe human bird flu case in the US, with the patient having been exposed to sick and dead birds in backyard flocks. California declared a state of emergency over an outbreak spreading among dairy cows, giving agencies more flexibility on staffing and contracting.

Ilena Peng and Gerry Smith Bloomberg
Date Posted:
December 19, 2024

There have been 61 human cases of bird flu detected in the US since April; a Louisiana resident has now been hospitalized with the first “severe” human case of avian influenza in the US.

There have been 61 human cases of bird flu detected in the US since April; a Louisiana resident has now been hospitalized...

Is bird flu causing severe human illness and emergency declarations?

Core argument: A Louisiana resident hospitalized with avian influenza is the first severe human bird flu case in the US, with exposure to sick and dead birds in backyard flocks and the infection source still under investigation.

A Louisiana resident has been hospitalized with bird flu, marking the first severe human case of avian influenza in the US, while California declared a state of emergency to respond to the growing outbreak among dairy cows. The Louisiana patient had exposure to sick and dead birds in backyard flocks, and an investigation into the source of the infection is still ongoing. There have been 61 human cases of bird flu detected in the US since April, with most patients reporting mild symptoms. California Governor Gavin Newsom declared an emergency to help contain an outbreak that’s been spreading among dairy cows. The move gives state and local agencies more flexibility around staffing, contracting, and other rules to support the response. More than half of the US bird flu infections in humans have occurred in California, where nearly 650 herds have been affected.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. A Louisiana resident hospitalized with avian influenza is the first severe human bird flu case in the US, with exposure to sick and dead birds in backyard flocks and the infection source still under investigation.
  2. The US has detected 61 human bird flu cases since April, with most patients reporting mild symptoms, and more than half of those infections have occurred in California.
  3. California Governor Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency over an outbreak spreading among dairy cows, giving state and local agencies more flexibility on staffing and contracting, with nearly 650 herds affected.

Related Articles:

  • A Single Mutation in Bovine Influenza H5N1 Hemagglutinin Switches Specificity to Human Receptors — Scientists studying the H5N1 bird flu virus currently circulating in North America find that a single mutation would be sufficient to change the virus from…
  • Serologic Evidence of Recent Infection with Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5) Virus Among Dairy Workers — Michigan and Colorado, June–August 2024 — A serologic survey of 115 dairy workers in Michigan and Colorado found that 8 (7%) had evidence of recent infection with highly pathogenic H5 bird flu virus, all of whom reported milking cows or cleaning the milking parlor. Four of those infected recalled illness around the time cows were sick.
  • How the Current Bird Flu Strain Evolved to be so Deadly — A Nature study tracking bird flu genome changes and reported outbreaks found the virus spread three times faster among wild birds than farmed poultry, attributed to mutations letting it adapt to diverse species. Outbreaks, once seasonal with Northern Hemisphere bird migration, have become persistent, killing millions of birds across five continents.
  • Science
Previous articleDecember 19, 2024The Hidden Threat to National Security Is Not Enough WorkersLabor constraints at shipyards are leading to supply constraints and quality issues as American warship tonnage under construction is projected to rise from 68,000 in 2014 to 167,000 by 2034. @greg_ipNext articleDecember 20, 2024The Trump Bump: The Republican Fertility Advantage In 2024In 2012, a 10% increase in a county’s GOP vote share was associated with a 0.05 increase in its total fertility rate, compared to 0.09 in 2024. The 20% most GOP counties in 2024 have a fertility rate of 1.76, the most Democratic 1.37. @lymanstoneky
Showing 10 database articles primarily about Science

Ancient DNA Reveals Pervasive Directional Selection Across West Eurasia

AI Summary. Analysis of ancient DNA from 15,836 West Eurasians estimates selection coefficients at 9.7m genetic variants and finds pervasive directional selection, including increases in genetic scores for light skin pigmentation and negative selection against variants linked to type 2 diabetes risk and psychoses such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Ali Akbari, Annabel Perry, Alison Barton, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al. Nature
Date Posted:
April 16, 2026
Is Database:
Database
Is Important:
Important

Ancient DNA from 15,836 West Eurasians reveals that natural selection accelerated dramatically in the past 10,000 years, following the agricultural revolution. The strongest selection drove improved immune function and lighter skin pigmentation.

Has human genetic selection continued to shape traits across West Eurasia?

Core argument: Applying a new test for directional selection to ancient DNA from 15,836 West Eurasians, 10,016 with newly reported data, the authors estimate selection coefficients at 9.7 million variants to study how selection shapes the genetic architecture of complex traits.

We present a method for detecting directional selection in ancient DNA time-series data that tests for consistent trends in allele frequency change over time, and apply it to 15,836 West Eurasians (10,016 with new data). We estimate selection coefficients at 9.7 million variants, enabling study of how Darwinian forces couple to allelic effects and shape the genetic architecture of complex traits. We focused on 12 traits of particular interest with significant signals from all three tests (Figure 4). One of the strongest signals is an increase over time in the PGS for light skin pigmentation. Type 2 diabetes risk factors give compelling signals of negative selection. We detected negative polygenic selection against alleles associated today with psychoses such as bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. We finally observed signals of selection for combinations of alleles that today are associated with three correlated behavioural traits: scores on intelligence tests, household income and years of schooling. An important caveat is [that] these effects were measured in industrialized societies, and it remains unclear how these relate to phenotypes that were adaptive in the past.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Applying a new test for directional selection to ancient DNA from 15,836 West Eurasians, 10,016 with newly reported data, the authors estimate selection coefficients at 9.7 million variants to study how selection shapes the genetic architecture of complex traits.
  2. Among 12 traits with significant signals from all three tests, one of the strongest is an increase over time in the polygenic score for light skin pigmentation, alongside negative selection on type 2 diabetes risk factors and on alleles associated today with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.
  3. The authors observed signals of selection on combinations of alleles associated today with intelligence test scores, household income, and years of schooling, while cautioning that these effects were measured in industrialized societies and their relation to past adaptive phenotypes remains unclear.

Related Articles:

  • Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection Realize the Promise of Ancient DNA to Elucidate Human Adaptation — Analyzing ancient DNA for consistent trends in gene-variant frequency over time, the authors report that many hundreds of gene variants were affected by strong directional selection over the last ten millennia. They identify selection for variant combinations today associated with lighter skin color, lower schizophrenia and bipolar risk, slower health decline, and higher intelligence-test scores, income, and schooling.
  • Animal Mutation Rates Reveal Traits That Speed Evolution — An analysis of 68 vertebrate species published in Nature found germline mutation rates varied about 40-fold per generation but roughly 120-fold per year, a wider range than earlier studies suggested. The authors found species with larger effective population sizes had lower mutation rates, evidence for the "drift-barrier hypothesis" that natural selection weakens against mutation in smaller populations.
  • Frontiers Evolutionary Trajectories of Complex Traits in European Populations of Modern Humans — Genome-wide polygenic scores indicate European populations after the Neolithic period show increases in height, educational attainment, and intelligence scores, alongside decreases in scores for unipolar depression. The authors associate this shift from relative stagnation to accelerated evolutionary change with the spread of agriculture and animal domestication.
  • Science
    • Evolution/Heredity
  • Workforce
    • Education
      • Test Scores
    • Inequality

Self-Selection and the Diminishing Returns of Research

AI Summary. The authors argue much of research's declining productivity is a transitional composition effect: the share of the labor force in research has tripled since the 1960s, and if researchers are positively selected on ability, that expansion lowered their average ability. Separating transitional from permanent diminishing returns nearly doubles predicted long-run per capita income growth.

Lorenz Ekerdt and Kai-Jie Wu Working Paper
Date Posted:
December 9, 2024
Is Database:
Database

Ekerdt and Wu argue that the diminishing returns to research since the 1960s is a result of the 3X increase in the share of the labor force employed in research, which resulted in a transitional decline in the “average ability among researchers.”

Does expanding the research workforce explain falling research productivity?

Core argument: The authors show the share of the labor force employed in research has risen 3-fold since the 1960s, an expansion they argue could not occur without lowering researchers' average ability if workers sort into sectors by ability.

We argue that a substantial portion of the declining productivity of research is the product of a transitional composition effect instead of a permanent phenomenon. We show that the share of the labor force employed in research has increased 3-fold since the 1960s. If workers are sorted into sectors according to ability, this rapid expansion cannot have been achieved without changing the average ability among researchers. If research is positively selected on ability, i.e., workers with a comparative advantage in research also tend to have an absolute advantage in research, the direction of this change is unambiguously negative. This source of diminishing returns is transitional because it is expected to fade away when the share of workers employed in research ceases to rise. Our results suggest that the average ability of researchers has fallen substantially. We find that separating transitional diminishing returns from permanent ones nearly doubles the long-run growth rate of per capita income predicted by a broad class of growth models.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. The authors show the share of the labor force employed in research has risen 3-fold since the 1960s, an expansion they argue could not occur without lowering researchers' average ability if workers sort into sectors by ability.
  2. The authors argue much of research's declining productivity is a transitional composition effect that fades once the research employment share stops rising, not a permanent phenomenon, and find average researcher ability has fallen substantially.
  3. Separating transitional from permanent diminishing returns nearly doubles the long-run growth rate of per capita income predicted by a broad class of growth models, according to the authors.

Related Articles:

  • Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find? — The authors estimate U.S. research productivity has fallen by a factor of 41 since the 1930s, averaging declines above 5% per year across sectors. Sustaining constant growth in output per person requires doubling research effort every 13 years, challenging growth models that assume constant research productivity.
  • Something Is Getting Harder But It’s Not Finding Ideas — The number of researchers in the US economy has grown to 23x its 1930 level while the economy's growth rate has been constant or declining, contradicting the assumption that constant research input yields a constant growth rate. Bloom et al. explain this divergence by assuming ideas get harder to find as more are discovered.
  • Science is Getting Harder — A growing "burden of knowledge" is making scientific breakthroughs harder, with the share of recent discoveries recognized as Nobel-worthy falling from about 90% before the 1970s to about 50% by 2015 even as the numbers of scientists and publications rose. Sustaining progress appears to require escalating research spending, expertise, and collaboration.
  • Science
  • Productivity
    • Innovation/Research

The Next Battle in Higher Ed May Strike at Its Soul: Scholarship

AI Summary. International retractions of research papers rose from about 400 in 2010 to more than 10,000 in 2023, an annual record, according to the journal Nature, which attributes part of the increase to paper-writing mills. Watchdog groups including Retraction Watch, the Center for Open Science, and Data Colada now scrutinize published research.

Anemona Hartocollis The New York Times
Date Posted:
January 16, 2024
Is Database:
Database

Over 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 globally according to @Nature, up from 400 in 2010. The retractions are due to both increased scrutiny but also the rise of “paper writing mills” or low-quality journals.

Over 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 globally according to @Nature, up from 400 in 2010.  The retractions are...

Are retractions of research papers rising sharply?

Core argument: Retracted research papers exceeded 10,000 internationally in 2023, an annual record, up from about 400 in 2010, according to the journal Nature.

A cottage industry of checking research papers sprung up in the last two decades, including Retraction Watch, the Center for Open Science, and Data Colada, a blog dedicated to unmasking research based on bad data. The number of retracted research papers has grown dramatically over time, to more than 10,000 retractions internationally in 2023, an annual record, according to the journal Nature, up from about 400 papers in 2010, when Retraction Watch began its work. This may be in part because the scrutiny has intensified, said Ivan Oransky, co-founder of Retraction Watch. Nature also blamed the rise of paper-writing mills. “What’s different this time is the levels at which this seems to be striking — Harvard and Stanford,” Dr. Oransky said. “These are cataclysmic events.”

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Retracted research papers exceeded 10,000 internationally in 2023, an annual record, up from about 400 in 2010, according to the journal Nature.
  2. Nature attributed part of the rise in retractions to paper-writing mills, while Retraction Watch co-founder Ivan Oransky said intensified scrutiny may also play a part.
  3. A cottage industry of research checking has emerged over two decades, including Retraction Watch, the Center for Open Science, and Data Colada, with Oransky saying cases now strike Harvard and Stanford.

Related Articles:

  • A Looming Retraction Casts a Shadow Over a Field of Physics — A major physics journal is retracting a paper on how a chemical compound transforms when compressed between diamonds, co-led by a University of Rochester physicist who also claimed to have discovered a room-temperature superconductor. While the researcher defends the work, some scientists who reviewed reports on it say the data submitted were falsified.
  • The U.S. Is Turning Away From Its Biggest Scientific Partner at a Precarious Time — More than 40% of high-quality U.S. scientific papers involve collaboration with researchers abroad, and China and the U.S. are each other's largest research partners, with their joint work consistently among the most-cited across fields. In some strategic areas, analysis of publication data finds the U.S. depends on China more than China depends on the U.S.
  • Science

Florida Ocean Temperatures At ‘Downright Shocking’ Levels

AI Summary. Much of Florida is recording its warmest year on record, with temperatures 3–5 degrees above normal and coastal waters in the Florida Keys reaching 92–96 degrees versus the more typical upper 80s. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reports about 40% of the world's oceans face a marine heat wave, the highest share on record.

Dan Stillman Washington Post
Date Posted:
July 11, 2023
Is Database:
Database

Coastal waters in Florida are currently between 92 and 96 degrees vs. typical averages in the upper 80s. About 40% of the world’s oceans are facing a marine heat wave according to @NOAA.

How warm have Florida's coastal waters and oceans worldwide become?

Core argument: Water temperatures in the Florida Keys have reached 92 to 96 degrees, which meteorologist Bob Henson called "downright shocking"; WFLA-TV chief meteorologist Jeff Berardelli said such waters are more typically in the upper 80s.

Much of Florida is seeing its warmest year on record, with temperatures running 3 to 5 degrees above normal. While some locations have been setting records since the beginning of the year, the hottest weather has come with an intense heat dome cooking the Sunshine State in recent weeks. That heat dome has made coastal waters extremely warm, including “downright shocking” temperatures of 92 to 96 degrees in the Florida Keys, meteorologist and journalist Bob Henson said Sunday in a tweet. “That’s boiling for them! More typically it would be in the upper 80s,” tweeted Jeff Berardelli, chief meteorologist and climate specialist at WFLA-TV in Tampa. The hot waters around Florida are connected to record-breaking ocean heat worldwide. About 40 percent of the world’s oceans are facing a marine heat wave, NOAA reported. That is the highest percentage on record, and it could reach 50 percent by September.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Water temperatures in the Florida Keys have reached 92 to 96 degrees, which meteorologist Bob Henson called "downright shocking"; WFLA-TV chief meteorologist Jeff Berardelli said such waters are more typically in the upper 80s.
  2. Much of Florida is seeing its warmest year on record, with temperatures running 3 to 5 degrees above normal and an intense heat dome bringing the hottest weather in recent weeks.
  3. NOAA reported that about 40 percent of the world's oceans face a marine heat wave, the highest percentage on record, and that share could reach 50 percent by September.

Related Articles:

  • Climate Shocks Are Making Parts of America Uninsurable. It Just Got Worse — State Farm, California's largest homeowner insurer, stopped accepting applications for most new home insurance policies statewide, citing rapidly growing catastrophe exposure. Florida faced a similar retreat by national carriers after Hurricane Andrew and responded with a market of small insurers backed by a state-mandated company providing windstorm coverage to homeowners who cannot obtain private insurance.
  • Global Temperatures Have Broken Records Three Times In A Week — Average global air temperature set new records three times within a single week. Aside from global warming, the biggest influence on Earth's temperature is the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, and because past highs have typically come near the end of a strong El Niño, the recent switch to El Niño is unlikely to explain these records.
  • Science
    • Global Warming

Earth Keeps Breaking Temperature Records Due to Global Warming

AI Summary. The average worldwide temperature reached a record 17C (63F), surpassing the prior record of 16.9C, and then climbed to 17.2C a day later, according to data from the US National Centers for Environmental Prediction.

Will Mathis and Aaron Clark Bloomberg
Date Posted:
July 5, 2023
Is Database:
Database

The world’s global mean temperature reached a record 63°F on July 4th, topping a previous record of 62°F set in 2016.

Are global average temperatures setting new record highs?

Core argument: The average worldwide temperature reached 17C (63F) on Monday, just above the previous record of 16.9C set in August 2016, according to data from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction.

The average worldwide temperature reached 17C (63F) on Monday, just above the previous record of 16.9C in August 2016, according to data from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction. The threshold only lasted a day. On Tuesday, the average temperature hit 17.2C.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. The average worldwide temperature reached 17C (63F) on Monday, just above the previous record of 16.9C set in August 2016, according to data from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction.
  2. The 17C mark held for only a day, as the global average temperature reached 17.2C on Tuesday.

Related Articles:

  • Antarctic Sea Ice Has Shrunk By An Area Nine Times The Size Of Britain — Antarctic sea ice cover fell to 10.7m square km, 1.15m square km below the prior record low for that date and 2.3m square km below the 1981–2010 average. Scientists have not established why sea ice around the continent dropped so steeply after an earlier period of growth.
  • Science
    • Global Warming

Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones

AI Summary. A study of top psychology, economics, and general interest journals finds that papers failing to replicate are cited more than those that replicate, with only 12% of later citations acknowledging the replication failure. The authors argue nonreplicable papers get published because journals trade off reproducibility standards against how interesting results appear.

Marta Serra-Garcia Science
Date Posted:
June 15, 2021
Is Database:
Database

Research in @ScienceAdvances finds papers that fail to replicate receive more citations than those that do replicate, even after publication of replication failures.

Do papers that fail to replicate receive more citations?

Core argument: Papers in top psychology, economics, and general interest journals that fail to replicate receive more citations than those that do replicate, according to a study in Science Advances.

A study in Science Advances reveals that papers in top psychology, economics, and general interest journals that fail to replicate receive more citations than those that do replicate. This trend persists even after the publication of replication failures, with only 12% of subsequent citations acknowledging these failures. The quality of citations for nonreplicable papers is comparable to replicable ones, as measured by the impact factor of citing journals. Experts can predict which papers will replicate, yet nonreplicable papers are often published due to a trade-off between the perceived interest of results and reproducibility standards. This suggests a systemic issue in academic publishing where the allure of novel findings outweighs the importance of scientific rigor, potentially skewing economic and policy decisions based on unreliable data.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Papers in top psychology, economics, and general interest journals that fail to replicate receive more citations than those that do replicate, according to a study in Science Advances.
  2. Only 12% of citations to nonreplicable papers published after replication failures acknowledge those failures, and the impact factor of citing journals is comparable for nonreplicable and replicable papers.
  3. The Science Advances study reports that experts can predict which papers will replicate, and attributes publication of nonreplicable papers to a trade-off between the perceived interest of results and reproducibility standards.

New paper from Science Advances highlights the replication problem in science, “….We use publicly available data to show that published papers in top psychology, economics, and general interest journals that fail to replicate are cited more than those that replicate. This difference in citation does not change after the publication of the failure to replicate. Only 12% of post replication citations of nonreplicable findings acknowledge the replication failure. Existing evidence also shows that experts predict well which papers will be replicated. Given this prediction, why are nonreplicable papers accepted for publication in the first place? A possible answer is that the review team faces a trade-off. When the results are more “interesting,” they apply lower standards regarding their reproducibility….”

Core result, “…Our main finding is that papers that fail to replicate in (5-7) are cited more than those that are replicable. We find no significant change in citation trends, even after the publication of the failed replication. Notably, only a minority of publications after the failed replications were published acknowledge the failure. The “quality” of citations of papers that failed to replicate is similar to that of papers that were replicated: We do not find a difference in how often the citations of nonreplicable publications are cited by others or in the impact factor of the journals in which citations are published…”

The evidence, "...Figure 1 shows the distribution of total citation counts by the end of 2019 of the papers included in the replication projects, separately depending on replicability for Nature/Science, economics journals, and psychology journals. Replicability is measured according to the criterion that the replication project featured a P value of 0.05 or lower in a two-sided test, with an effect in the same direction as the original test….”

Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones: Extended Excerpt Image 1


Marta Serra-Garcia and Uri Gneezy, "Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones,"Science Advances, May 21, 2021, https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/7/21/eabd1705

  • Science
© Copyright 2026 Coherent Research Institute · All Rights Reserved · Privacy · Terms