“A full-throated defense of economic dynamism.” - The Wall Street Journal
“…a comprehensive explanation of the modern economy.” - Julian Robertson, Founder, Tiger Management
“…reminds us that inequality sends a signal of what society lacks most, in America’s case, entrepreneurship and risk taking.” - Lawrence Lindsey, CEO, The Lindsey Group, former Director of the National Economic Council
“Unintended Consequences is far smarter and more thought-provoking than most economics written for the general public” - Greg Mankiw, Harvard University, Former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors
“…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
“…a must-read for serious students of economic policy.” - Glenn Hubbard, Dean, Columbia Business School, and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
“…a must-read for serious students of economic policy.” - Glenn Hubbard, Dean, Columbia Business School, and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
“…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
“Unintended Consequences is full of substance, it is one of the must-read books of the year, and once I finish it I will be giving it a second read through right away.” - Tyler Cowen, Professor, George Mason University
“There are an amazing number of good ideas and interesting points made in Unintended Consequences. The thinking underlying it, and the obvious depth of understanding of the author, are very impressive.” - Steven Levitt, coauthor of Freakonomics; 2004 John Bates Clark Medal
“Unintended Consequences should be read by anyone who takes for granted the superiority of progressive taxation and has not thought carefully about the trade-offs involved.” - The New Republic
“Unintended Consequences provides a provocative interpretation of the causes of the global financial crisis and the policies needed to return to rapid growth. Whether you agree or not, this analysis is well worth reading.” - Nouriel Roubini, New York University; Chairman, Roubini Global Economics

Showing 92 database articles primarily about China

Currently filtering by:

Remove China

Remove "primary topics only" restriction

Remove 'Database'

Show all 7,315 articles

For whatever topics you select (currently: China):

Include articles that mention this topic 132

Only articles primarily about this topic 92

Globalization and Growth In A Bipolar World

Barry Eichengreen National Council of Applied Economic Research

Date Posted:: February 16, 2024

The US and China have accepted a deterioration in efficiency in exchange for an improvement in security, reflected in declining FDI flows between the two countries and diversion of supply chains through countries like Vietnam and Mexico. @B_Eichengreen

Bilateral trade between the world’s two largest economies has been slowing relative to global trade. Protectionist measures have led to some reshoring of the final stages of production but also to rerouting of trade through third countries. Capital and foreign direct investment flows between the U.S. and China have declined precipitously due to a combination of government controls and political uncertainties. But the fact that total U.S. inward and outward FDI has remained buoyant points to the existence foreign investment diversion to other countries. Likewise, China, even while investing less in the United States, has been ramping up investment in and running growing trade surpluses with countries like Vietnam and Mexico that export significant volumes to the United States, including conceivably goods produced using Chinese parts, components, and technology. In sum, U.S.-China tensions have led to some loosening of economic links between the two countries but not to the end of globalization. The governments in question have accepted this deterioration in efficiency in return for what they hope will be an improvement in national security.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup^® AI

Bilateral U.S.–China trade has slowed relative to global trade, while protectionist measures have produced some reshoring of final production stages alongside rerouting of trade through third countries.
Capital and foreign direct investment flows between the U.S. and China have declined precipitously due to government controls and political uncertainties, yet total U.S. inward and outward FDI has remained buoyant, pointing to investment diversion to other countries.
China has ramped up investment in and run growing trade surpluses with countries such as Vietnam and Mexico that export significant volumes to the United States, conceivably including goods made with Chinese parts, components, and technology.

Who Loses from China’s Export Gains?

Charles Austin Jordan and Logan Wright Rhodium Group

Date Posted:: September 24, 2026
Is Database:: Database

China’s share of global exports by volume is on track to rise from 20% in 2025 to 28% by 2030. Yet China’s rising export share may depress the total value of global exports as lower-priced Chinese goods displace more expensive exports from other countries.

The net result of our projection would suggest that China gains around $1.13 trillion in annual export value by 2030 relative to the baseline scenario, while the rest of the world loses around $5.1 trillion, with the G7 accounting for $2.25 trillion of those potential losses alone. This implies that China’s export share gains effectively destroy overall global trade values relative to the status quo due to continued declines in export prices. Regardless of which assumptions are used, China’s export share gains appear to reduce global total potential export values, because trade patterns are shifting toward Chinese goods that are declining in price.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup^® AI

The projection has China gaining roughly $1.13 trillion in annual export value by 2030 relative to the baseline scenario, while the rest of the world loses about $5.1 trillion.
The G7 accounts for $2.25 trillion of the projected $5.1 trillion in export value losses borne by countries outside China.
China’s export share gains appear to reduce global total potential export values regardless of the assumptions used, because trade patterns shift toward Chinese goods whose prices continue to decline.

The Export Wave Is Cresting

Andrew Batson Gavekal

Date Posted:: September 23, 2026
Is Database:: Database

Andrew Batson argues that as the memory-chip price cycle’s impact on Chinese export growth fades, export growth in renminbi terms in 2027 “will most likely converge toward the recent trend for products outside the AI complex, which is around 5–7%.”

China’s latest extraordinary export wave is showing signs of cresting. The headline YoY growth of exports has leveled off over the past three months, staying around 24-27% in US dollar terms and 18-20% in renminbi terms. The boom in exports of products associated with investment in artificial intelligence is certainly not over, but current super-high growth rates will probably slow in coming months. Memory chips are now the biggest single swing factor for exports, and prices for some products have recently leveled off after their massive surge. While the ebb and flow of memory prices is difficult to forecast, growth of total exports in 2027 will most likely converge toward the recent trend for products outside the AI complex, which is around 5-7%. Semiconductor cycles have limited implications for China’s vast range of other exports, which are still very competitive in global markets.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup^® AI

China’s export growth has leveled off over the past three months at roughly 24–27% year-on-year in US dollar terms and 18–20% in renminbi terms, a sign the export wave is cresting.
Memory chips are the biggest single swing factor for China’s exports, with prices for some products leveling off after a massive surge and super-high AI-related growth rates likely to slow in coming months.
Total Chinese export growth in 2027 will most likely converge toward the recent 5–7% trend for products outside the AI complex, which remain very competitive in global markets.

Who Will Win The War Of Neo-Mercantilists?

Martin Wolf Financial Times

Date Posted:: July 22, 2026
Is Database:: Database

Martin Wolf estimates that under reasonable assumptions, China should be earning ~$100B annually on her $4T of foreign assets. Yet, China shows an unexplained negative net income of around $125bn on its net foreign asset position.

China’s macroeconomics are very different from those obtained before the global financial crisis and, even more so, before the end of its property boom. Exports are surging, but domestic demand has stalled. China's export surplus in manufacturing is now around 2% of world GDP, which is “roughly twice the largest surplus Japan ever ran.” Most importantly, China shows an unexplained negative net income of around $125bn on its net foreign investments. But it should, on reasonable assumptions about the income it earns on its $4tn in net foreign assets, have a surplus of some $100bn. As a result, Brad Setser argues, the renminbi is by now some 30% undervalued. China’s policies look unavoidably threatening to much of the world. If a major trading partner runs huge and persistent trade and current account surpluses, everyone else has to run offsetting deficits. This leads to the shrinkage of sectors specialising in producing tradable goods and services, as well as huge domestic financial deficits.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup^® AI

China's manufacturing export surplus stands at roughly 2% of world GDP, described as roughly twice the largest surplus Japan ever ran, while exports surge and domestic demand stalls.
China reports an unexplained negative net income of about $125bn on its net foreign investments, though reasonable assumptions about returns on its $4tn in net foreign assets imply a surplus near $100bn.
Brad Setser argues the renminbi is some 30% undervalued; persistent Chinese trade and current account surpluses require offsetting deficits elsewhere, shrinking sectors producing tradable goods and services and producing large domestic financial deficits.

China’s Trade Surplus With EU Hits Record as Tensions Intensify

Bloomberg Staff Bloomberg

Date Posted:: July 14, 2026
Is Database:: Database

China’s trade surplus with the European Union increased 27% y/y to $32.9B in June. China’s surplus with Germany more than doubled.

China’s trade surplus with the European Union climbed to a fresh high, keeping the issue of growing imbalances high on the agenda as the bloc weighs new measures to shield local industries. With exports to the EU soaring to a record, China’s surplus with the bloc rose 27% from a year earlier to $32.9 billion in June, according to Chinese customs data released on Tuesday. The country’s surplus with Germany more than doubled year-on-year while plunging 81% with France. For the first half of the year, China imported $135.6 billion of goods from the EU, up 9% from a year earlier. Meanwhile its exports amounted to $312.3 billion during the period, a gain of 17%.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup^® AI

China's trade surplus with the EU rose 27% from a year earlier to $32.9 billion in June, with exports to the bloc reaching a record, according to Chinese customs data.
China exported $312.3 billion of goods to the EU in the first half of the year, up 17%, while importing $135.6 billion from the bloc, up 9%.
China's surplus with Germany more than doubled from a year earlier while its surplus with France fell 81%, as the EU weighs new measures to shield local industries.

The Emergence Of A New Anchor

Charles Gave and Louis-Vincent Gave Gavekal

Date Posted:: May 20, 2026
Is Database:: Database

Post-covid, Renminbi bonds have outperformed all major bond markets over 1, 3, 5, and 10 years. Charles and Louis-Vincent Gave argue that two parallel worlds are emerging: an inflationary OECD and a deflationary Asia/emerging markets.

Renminbi bonds have now outperformed other major bond markets year to date, over the past 12 months, three years, five years, so far this decade, and over the past 10 years. Most countries now trade more with China than with the US. This is arguably the major shift of the past two decades. Put differently, for all the talk of “deglobalization,” the world is not so much “deglobalizing” as “de-Westernizing.” The idea that the world is closing in on itself would sound silly to anyone living in Jakarta, Mumbai, Dubai, or São Paulo. And the more countries trade with China, the more comfortable they become saving in renminbi and buying renminbi bonds to fund future trade. In turn, this implies the coexistence of two worlds: one stable—Asia and emerging markets—and one unstable—the OECD; one inflationary—the OECD—and the other deflationary—Asia and emerging markets.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup^® AI

Renminbi bonds have outperformed other major bond markets year to date and over the past 12 months, three years, five years, this decade, and the past 10 years.
Most countries now trade more with China than with the United States, a shift the author calls arguably the major one of the past two decades and a sign the world is "de-Westernizing" rather than deglobalizing.
The author argues that greater trade with China makes countries more comfortable saving in renminbi and buying renminbi bonds, implying two coexisting worlds: a stable, deflationary Asia and emerging markets, and an unstable, inflationary OECD.

Finding China in the U.S.TIC Data

Brad Setser Council on Foreign Relations

Date Posted:: May 19, 2026
Is Database:: Database

Once you add back what’s hidden in European custodial centers, China’s US bond holdings have fallen less than the headline “China” line suggests. Setser estimates that China’s total US assets are still 50–55% of its reserve portfolio.

China hasn’t disclosed the currency composition of its reserves since 2020. But it isn’t clear that China’s central bank has shifted its currency composition of its foreign currency holdings around a lot, in part because the dollar share of its reserves was already low (5 percent) and going underweight the dollar means losing yield. But there is no doubt that China’s holdings did start to disappear from the U.S. data right after the G-7 immobilized Russian reserves in early 2022. There is a clear fall around this time in the bonds China holds in U.S. custodians. Estimating China’s true holdings of U.S. assets has gotten harder because it seems like China has diversified not just out of the US, but also out of Euroclear (a large Belgium-based custodian). The overall result suggests that China has reduced the share of its portfolio in long-term Treasuries, while increasing its bill holdings and maintaining a sizeable Agency portfolio of around 10 percent of total reserves (more than before 2020). Zooming the chart in highlights that the key implication of this upward adjustment to China’s estimated holdings of Agencies is that China’s total U.S. financial holdings remain between 50 and 55 percent of its reserve portfolio.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup^® AI

China's total U.S. financial holdings remain between 50 and 55 percent of its reserve portfolio after an upward adjustment to its estimated Agency holdings, which stand at around 10 percent of total reserves, more than before 2020.
China's holdings began disappearing from the U.S. data right after the G-7 immobilized Russian reserves in early 2022, with a clear fall in the bonds China holds at U.S. custodians.
China appears to have reduced the share of its portfolio in long-term Treasuries while increasing bill holdings, and estimating its true U.S. asset holdings has grown harder as it diversified out of Euroclear as well.

The US and China have accepted a deterioration in efficiency in exchange for an improvement in security, reflected in declining FDI flows between the two countries and diversion of supply chains through countries like Vietnam and Mexico. @B_Eichengreen

Are declining US-China trade and investment flows ending globalization?

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

Related Articles:

China’s share of global exports by volume is on track to rise from 20% in 2025 to 28% by 2030. Yet China’s rising export share may depress the total value of global exports as lower-priced Chinese goods displace more expensive exports from other countries.

Do China's export share gains reduce global export values?

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

Related Articles:

Andrew Batson argues that as the memory-chip price cycle’s impact on Chinese export growth fades, export growth in renminbi terms in 2027 “will most likely converge toward the recent trend for products outside the AI complex, which is around 5–7%.”

Is China's export boom leveling off toward slower growth?

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

Related Articles:

Martin Wolf estimates that under reasonable assumptions, China should be earning ~$100B annually on her $4T of foreign assets. Yet, China shows an unexplained negative net income of around $125bn on its net foreign asset position.

Is China's currency undervalued as its export surplus hits record levels?

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

Related Articles:

China’s trade surplus with the European Union increased 27% y/y to $32.9B in June. China’s surplus with Germany more than doubled.

Is China's trade surplus with the European Union reaching record levels?

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

Related Articles:

Post-covid, Renminbi bonds have outperformed all major bond markets over 1, 3, 5, and 10 years. Charles and Louis-Vincent Gave argue that two parallel worlds are emerging: an inflationary OECD and a deflationary Asia/emerging markets.

Is rising trade with China making countries save in renminbi?

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

Related Articles:

Once you add back what’s hidden in European custodial centers, China’s US bond holdings have fallen less than the headline “China” line suggests. Setser estimates that China’s total US assets are still 50–55% of its reserve portfolio.

Has China's holdings of U.S. assets become harder to track?

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

Related Articles:

Takeaways by Macro Roundup^® AI

Takeaways by Macro Roundup^® AI

Takeaways by Macro Roundup^® AI

Takeaways by Macro Roundup^® AI

Takeaways by Macro Roundup^® AI

Takeaways by Macro Roundup^® AI

Takeaways by Macro Roundup^® AI