Wage Levels, Incidence Of Low Pay
- Date Posted:
- Is Database:
- Database
The relationship btw low wage levels and numeracy skills is evident as data shows a significant share of workers earning less than two-thirds of median earnings also score at Level One or below in numeracy
“Wage Levels, Incidence Of Low Pay” OECD, Accessed August 23, 2021, https://data.oecd.org/earnwage/wage-levels.htm
“Skills Matter: Additional Results From The Survey Of Adult Skills, Table 2.9 Numeracy Proficiency Among Adults,” OECD, Accessed August 23, 2021, https://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/publications/firstcycledocumentation/webpackagesforskillsmatter2019round3/chapter2ofskillsmatteradditionalresultsfromthesurveyofadultskills.htm
Sources:




Ed Comment:Let's see share of level one and below test score -- the definition if low scorers that we use elsewhere. That what should correspond with low-wage earners. The US has 28% level 1 and below and 28% low wage earners. Germany has 18. What does the wage include or not include?
Steve Comment:The R2 moves slightly down to 16% (from 17%) the CORREL function is now.4075OECD's Wage levels indicator is derived from there average wages measure, "...Average wages are obtained by dividing the national-accounts-basedtotal wage bill by the average number of employees in the total economy, which is then multiplied by the ratio of the average usual weekly hours per full-time employee to the average usually weekly hours for all employees. This indicator is measured in USD constant prices using 2016 base year and Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs) for private consumption of the same year...."
Steve Comment: So the OECD’sincidence of low pay“…refers to the share of workers earning less thantwo-thirds of median earnings….”The series also “…refer to full time-employees…” so as you point out the high levels of part time employment in western Europe are going to skew this number as the data isn’t capturing those workers. So our is calculated using median earnings. The overall wage series that it’s a part of uses average earnings for most of the indicators so it used average in their overall definition.
Ed Comment:The graph says median, not average. The verbiage you sent says average, not median. Which is it? My guess is that Japan is different from the west. They don’t have many low-scores and they have lots of shopkeepers and a distribution system with very low productivity. I think they don’t reform it for the sake of employment. Finland has very high scores. So unlike other countries, its low earners are probably overwhelmed by workers with hidden variables (disabilities, mental illness, sickness, alcoholics, laziness, etc.). France looks hinky from a data perspective. It might be fudging the numbers by not fully counting “temporary” workers in its wages. The US only has 28% part time workers. Europe is more like 40% (e.g., France, Germany and the UK). Germany and France, use temps to avoid costly layoffs. Not always clear how they count them.