Are off-balance-sheet vehicles hiding the risk of AI data center debt?
Core argument: A rough estimate puts current AI data center spending above telecom capital spending during the dot-com bubble, driven by the same sort of hyperbolic projections of future usage and spending.
The capital needed for these buildouts is so large that doing it with orthodox balance sheet debt, or by issuing sufficient equity, let alone spending your cash, would make a mess of your balance sheet. By structuring it this way, via special purpose vehicles (SPVs) in which they have joint ownership, companies like Meta don't have to show the debt as their debt. It is the debt of those guys over there, that SPV. Not us. Granted, they retain shared control, and they get to use the AI data center, and nothing there happens without their say-so, but still. It's not ours. [Here] is a rough estimate of AI data center now vs telecom spending then during the dot-com bubble. We are already spending more now than then, driven by the same sort of hyperbolic projections of future usage and spending. They may turn out to be correct, but if the returns aren't there quickly, the thin equity cushion above datacenter SPV debtholders will be speedily wiped out.

