Does raising household consumption require giving up manufacturing competitiveness?
Core argument: Michael Pettis argues that China's low consumption share of GDP is not an accident but fundamental to its manufacturing competitiveness, so raising the consumption share requires changing that competitiveness.
The key point is that a low consumption share of GDP is not an accident, or an oversight. It is fundamental to China’s manufacturing competitiveness. To change one means changing the other. That is why raising the consumption share is so challenging. Japan faced the same problem in the 1980s. It proposed in 1986, with the Maekawa Commission report, to solve the problem by raising the household share of Japanese GDP. But for the next five years the consumption share of Japan’s GDP declined, after which it took 17 years to raise the consumption share of GDP by 10 percentage points. Of course, it is not a coincidence that during this time, the manufacturing share of Japan’s GDP declined from 27% to around 20%, even as Japan’s share of global GDP declined from 17% to 7%. The point is that weak consumption and a globally competitive manufacturing sector are often different sides of the same coin.

