Does expanding university attendance leave graduates falling short of expectations?
Core argument: In both the UK and US, only 10% of graduates fall in the lowest earnings quartile, yet one in three ranks in the bottom bracket for earnings relative to reasonable expectations.
The expansion of higher education, while well intentioned and clearly beneficial in many aspects, has upset the balance between expectations and outcomes. The dynamic I’m talking about here is a much broader phenomenon [than the erosion of the graduate wage premium]. As more and more people go to university, the average graduate shifts from being among the economic elite to being the norm, placing them much further down the socio-economic pecking order than graduates of yesteryear. The result is that even though today’s young adults, and graduates in particular, are over-represented in the top quartile of the earnings distribution, they are also far more likely to be at the bottom than the top for earnings relative to reasonable expectations. In both the UK and US, even though only 10% of graduates are in the lowest earnings quartile, one in three is in the bottom bracket for earnings relative to expectations. As a larger share of youngsters go to university, those who don’t are an ever more disadvantaged slice of their generation.

