Edward Conard

Top Ten New York Times Bestselling Author

  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • “…reminds us that inequality sends a signal of what society lacks most, in America’s case, entrepreneurship and risk taking.” - Lawrence Lindsey, CEO, The Lindsey Group, former Director of the National Economic Council
  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • “Unintended Consequences is far smarter and more thought-provoking than most economics written for the general public” - Greg Mankiw, Harvard University, Former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors
  • “Unintended Consequences is full of substance, it is one of the must-read books of the year, and once I finish it I will be giving it a second read through right away.” - Tyler Cowen, Professor, George Mason University
  • “…a very valuable contribution.” - Larry Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury and director of the National Economic Council, president emeritus, Harvard University
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “…reminds us that inequality sends a signal of what society lacks most, in America’s case, entrepreneurship and risk taking.” - Lawrence Lindsey, CEO, The Lindsey Group, former Director of the National Economic Council
  • “…a must-read for serious students of economic policy.” - Glenn Hubbard, Dean, Columbia Business School, and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
  • “Unintended Consequences offers deep and well-argued analyses on almost every issue.” - The New York Times
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “…a must-read for serious students of economic policy.” - Glenn Hubbard, Dean, Columbia Business School, and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
Upside of Inequality Oxford Unintended Consequences
Buy the Books
  • Macro Roundup
  • About Roundup
  • About Ed Conard
  • Highlights
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
Edward Conard
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • youtube
  • Email
  • Text Message (SMS)
  • Twitter/X
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp Message
Subscribe to Macro Roundup Emails
  • Mentions 138
  • Primary focus 84
Showing 84 database articles primarily about Test Scores
Currently filtering by:
  • Remove Test Scores
  • Remove "primary topics only" restriction
  • Remove 'Database'
Show all 7,320 articles
For whatever topics you select (currently: Test Scores):
Choose search scope

Your importance filter 'Database' shows fewer articles.

Remove filters to see full article counts

Are High Quality Schools Enough to Close the Achievement Gap? Evidence from a Social Experiment in Harlem

AI Summary. Students in the Harlem Children's Zone charter schools gained over four-fifths of a standard deviation in math and one-quarter to one-third in English by eighth grade, closing the black-white math gap and halving the English gap, with elementary students closing the racial gap in both subjects by third grade.

Will Dobbie National Bureau of Economic Research
Date Posted:
August 7, 2020
Is Database:
Database

Harlem Children’s Zone closes black-white achievement gap for younger students, with HCZ students showing reduced absenteeism & similar benefits across all ability levels.

Can high quality schools close the racial achievement gap?

Core argument: Harlem Children's Zone students enrolled in sixth grade gain over four-fifths of a standard deviation in math and one-quarter to one-third in English Language Arts by eighth grade, closing the math gap and halving the ELA gap.

The Harlem Children's Zone (HCZ) has demonstrated significant success in closing the black-white achievement gap among younger students. By eighth grade, students enrolled in HCZ's sixth grade gain over four-fifths of a standard deviation in math and between one-quarter and one-third in English Language Arts (ELA), effectively closing the math gap and halving the ELA gap. Elementary students achieve gains of four-fifths to one and a half standard deviations in both subjects by third grade, closing the racial gap entirely. These results are consistent across various statistical models and subsamples, indicating robust effectiveness. Additionally, HCZ students show reduced absenteeism and similar benefits across all ability levels. The broader implications suggest that high-quality schools, possibly combined with community investments, can significantly alter life trajectories, with potential public benefits exceeding $250,000 per high school graduate converted from dropout status.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Harlem Children's Zone students enrolled in sixth grade gain over four-fifths of a standard deviation in math and one-quarter to one-third in English Language Arts by eighth grade, closing the math gap and halving the ELA gap.
  2. Harlem Children's Zone elementary students gain four-fifths to one and a half standard deviations in both math and ELA by third grade, closing the racial achievement gap, with results consistent across statistical models and subsamples.
  3. Harlem Children's Zone students show reduced absenteeism and similar benefits across ability levels, and public benefits are estimated to exceed $250,000 per high school graduate converted from dropout status.

Will Dobbie and Ronald Fryer, "Are High Quality Schools Enough to Close the Achievement Gap? Evidence from a Social Experiment in Harlem," National Bureau Of Economic Research, November 2009, https://www.nber.org/papers/w15473

“…Harlem Children’s Zone is effective at increasing the achievement of the poorest minority children. Students enrolled in the sixth grade gain more than four fifths of a standard deviation in math and between one-quarter and one-third of a standard deviation in English Language Arts (ELA) by eighth grade. Taken at face value, these effects are enough to close the black-white achievement gap in mathematics and reduce it by about half in ELA. Students in the HCZ elementary school gain approximately four fifths to one and a half a standard deviation in both math and ELA by third grade, closing the racial achievement gap in both subjects. HCZ students are also less likely to be absent. These results are robust across identification strategies, model specifications, and subsamples of the data. Surprisingly, students of all ability levels obtain roughly the same benefit from attending HCZ charters. ….HCZ is enormously successful at boosting achievement in math and ELA in elementary school and math in middle school. The impact of being offered admission into the HCZ middle school on ELA achievement is positive, but less dramatic..Figures 3-5 provide a visual representation of our basic results from HCZ Promise Academy - Middle School. Figure 3A plots yearly, raw, mean state math test scores, from fourth to eighth grade, for four subgroups: lottery winners, lottery losers, white students in New York City public schools and black students in New York City public schools. Lottery winners are comprised of students who either won the lottery or who had a sibling that is already enrolled in the HCZ Promise Academy. Lottery losers are individuals who lost the lottery and did not have a sibling already enrolled. Technically, these represent ITT estimates. In fourth and fifth grade, before they enter the middle school, math test scores for lottery winners, losers, and the typical black student in New York City are virtually identical, and roughly 0.75 standard deviations behind the typical white student. Lottery winners have a modest increase in sixth grade, followed by a more substantial increase in seventh grade and even larger gains by their eighth-grade year. The TOT estimate, which is the effect of actually attending the HCZ Promise Academy Middle School, is depicted in panel B of Figure 3. As we directly observe test scores of lottery winners who enroll and we have a TOT estimate, we can estimate the mean test score for those in the control group who would have enrolled if they had won the lottery (Kling et al., 2007). The TOT results follow a similar pattern, showing remarkable convergence between children in the middle school and the average white student in New York City. After three years of “treatment,” HCZ Promise Academy students have nearly closed the achievement gap in math - they are behind their white counterparts by 0.121 standard deviations (p-value = 0.113). If one adjusts for gender and free lunch, the typical eighth grader enrolled in the HCZ middle school outscores the typical white eighth grader in New York City public schools by 0.087 standard deviations though the difference is not statistically significant (p-value = 0.238). Put differently, the typical student before entering the HCZ public charter school was at the 20th percentile of the white distribution. After three years, the typical student is at the 45th percentile before adjusting for gender and free lunch and the 54th percentile after adjusting for gender and free lunch…”

“…. We use two separate statistical strategies to account for the fact that students who attend HCZ schools are not likely to be a random sample. First, we exploit the fact that HCZ charter schools are required to select students by lottery when the number of applicants exceeds the number of available slots for admission. In this scenario, the treatment group is composed of students who are lottery winners and the control group consists of students who are lottery losers. This allows us to provide a set of causal estimates of the effect of being offered admission into the HCZ charter schools on a range of outcomes, including test scores, attendance, and grade completion. There are two important caveats to our lottery identification strategy. First, the HCZ middle school was not significantly oversubscribed in its first year of operation, and the HCZ elementary schools have never been significantly oversubscribed, making it more difficult to estimate the effect of being offered admission for these groups. Second, results from any lottery sample may lack external validity. The counterfactual we identify is for students who are already interested in charter schools. The effect of being offered admission to HCZ for these students may be different than for other types of students. To complement the lotteries, our second identification strategy uses the interaction between a student’s home address and her cohort year as an instrumental variable. This approach takes advantage of two important features of the HCZ charter schools: (1) anyone is eligible to enroll in HCZ’s schools, but only students living inside the Zone are actively recruited by HCZ staff; and (2) there are cohorts of children that are ineligible due to the timing of the schools’ opening and their age. Our identification is driven by the between-cohort comparison of outcomes within the Zone, using the outcomes of children outside the Zone to control for natural year-to-year variation in test scores. If the interaction between a student’s address and cohort only affects his or her outcome through its effect on enrollment in the charter school, this provides another set of causal estimates. Both statistical approaches lead us to the same basic story. Harlem Children’s Zone is effective at increasing the achievement of the poorest minority children. Students enrolled in the sixth grade gain more than four fifths of a standard deviation in math and between one-quarter and one-third of a standard deviation in English Language Arts (ELA) by eighth grade. Taken at face value, these effects are enough to close the black-white achievement gap in mathematics and reduce it by about half in ELA. Students in the HCZ elementary school gain approximately four fifths to one and a half a standard deviation in both math and ELA by third grade, closing the racial achievement gap in both subjects. HCZ students are also less likely to be absent. These results are robust across identification strategies, model specifications, and subsamples of the data. Surprisingly, students of all ability levels obtain roughly the same benefit from attending HCZ charters. ….HCZ is enormously successful at boosting achievement in math and ELA in elementary school and math in middle school. The impact of being offered admission into the HCZ middle school on ELA achievement is positive, but less dramatic. High-quality schools or community investments coupled with high-quality schools drive these results, but community investments alone cannot....Taken at face value, the achievement gains of HCZ students will translate into dramatically improved life trajectories. Our middle school lottery estimates - the most modest estimated - suggest a 9.7 to 12.5 percent increase in….a 2.8 to 3.7 percent decrease in the probability of committing a property or violent crime….and a 12.5 to 18.8 decrease in the probability of having a health disability…..If HCZ affects educational attainment as dramatically as achievement, the implied benefits are enormous….The public benefits alone from converting a high school dropout to graduate are more than $250,000.54...”
Are High Quality Schools Enough to Close the Achievement Gap? Evidence from a Social Experiment in Harlem: Extended Excerpt Image 1

However in2013he did look at the impact of the same school on Non-Test outcomes and found HCZ had additional positive effects, “…Six years after the random admissions lottery, youth offered admission to the Promise Academy middle school score 0.283 standard deviations higher on a nationally-normed math achievement test and are 14.1 percentage points more likely to enroll in college. Admitted females are 12.1 percentage points less likely to be pregnant in their teens, and males are 4.3 percentage points less likely to be incarcerated....”

Fryer found (after attempting to control for selection bias) that Harlem Children's Zone has been effective in closing black-white achievement gap, note he hasn’t undated this since 2009 to see how robust the results remain (it came out in 2009, was published in 2011)

Ed Comment:You can add to the base but the research shows the effects dies out as the children age and this doesn’t address that. why? because with enough instruction you can tach someone arithmetic and two equations with two unknowns, but you can’t teach them how to apply it years later. My guess is that by the 12thgrade, very few people can still do the math.

  • Test Scores
  • Comparisons
    • Race
  • Workforce
    • Education
      • K-12
Previous articleAugust 7, 2020Does America Need to Invest More in Science? 5 Charts to ConsiderUS R&D expenditures as a % of GDP have shown fluctuations over time, raising questions about the adequacy of current investment levels in science. @JamesPethokoukis/AEI #R&D.Next articleAugust 10, 2020Black White Differences In Intergenerational Economic Mobility In The United StatesRacial gaps in mobility are relatively small for those with median AFQT scores. The black-white gap in moving out of the bottom quintile is 5.2pp, compared to 27pp unconditional. @BhashkarMazumder, Economic Perspectives.
Showing 83 database articles primarily about Test Scores

PISA 2025 Results (Volume I)

AI Summary. International student assessment results show mathematics performance held near earlier levels for about 15 years before falling sharply, with mean scores down 9 points in math and about 14 in reading in the latest cycle. Reported student motivation and school engagement declined, and hasty incorrect answering rose to 11%.

OECD Staff Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Date Posted:
September 8, 2026
Is Database:
Database

Mean OECD math and reading scores fell roughly 25 PISA points—about a year of schooling—between 2018 and 2025, alongside reduced motivation and engagement and increased carelessness, exemplified by a near-doubling of “hasty readers.”

Are international student test scores falling alongside declining motivation and engagement?

Core argument: PISA 2025 mean performance fell by 9 score points in mathematics and about 14 points in reading between 2022 and 2025, after mathematics scores had remained close to their 2003 level through 2018.

In math, performance remained close to the 2003 level up to 2018, then dropped sharply btw 2018 and 2025. Mean performance dropped by 9 score points in mathematics and about 14 score points in reading btw 2022 and 2025. Over the 2018-2025 period, the largest drops [in reading] were among the most advantaged 25% of socio-economic status, and the socio-economic gap with the most disadvantaged students reduced somewhat, by 11 points, on average across 35 OECD countries. In mathematics, the share of disadvantaged students scoring below proficiency Level 2 increased in previous cycles and remained high in 2025; among advantaged students, the share scoring below proficiency Level 2 increased, reaching 18% in 2025, about 4pp. Students’ reports of their motivation for learning and engagement with school also declined between 2022 and 2025. The proportion of “hasty readers” – those who gave fast and incorrect responses – increased by about five percentage points, on average, from almost 7% in 2018 to 11% in 2025. Analyses for math, also show an increase in the proportion of hasty responses between 2022 and 2025.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. PISA 2025 mean performance fell by 9 score points in mathematics and about 14 points in reading between 2022 and 2025, after mathematics scores had remained close to their 2003 level through 2018.
  2. Over 2018–2025, the largest reading declines came among the most advantaged 25% by socio-economic status, and the gap with the most disadvantaged students narrowed by 11 points on average across 35 OECD countries.
  3. The share of "hasty readers," who gave fast and incorrect responses, rose about five percentage points, from almost 7% in 2018 to 11% in 2025, with hasty responses in mathematics also increasing between 2022 and 2025.

Related Articles:

  • Do Adults Have the Skills They Need to Thrive in a Changing World? — An international assessment of adult skills describes numeracy proficiency levels ranging from counting objects and adding small whole numbers at the lowest level, to extracting information from tables and graphs and performing basic arithmetic with money and percentages at Level 1, up to analysing complex mathematical information and critically evaluating whether data support a claim at Level 5.
  • Are China’s Students Really Number One? A Statistical Riddle — China's reported 65-point jump in mean international student test scores between testing rounds coincided with a change in which provinces represented the country, swapping the most populous province for a richer, much smaller one. The author argues such swings, including a fall in low performers from 43% to 19% in reading, are unmatched elsewhere.
  • Have Humans Passed Peak Brain Power? — The share of Americans reporting they read a book in the past year has fallen below half, alongside declining performance in numeracy and problem-solving in most countries. The share of adults unable to use mathematical reasoning to evaluate the validity of statements averages 25% in high-income countries and 35% in the US.
  • Test Scores
  • Workforce
    • Education
      • K-12

Standardized Test Scores and Academic Performance at a Public University System

AI Summary. A study of a large public urban university system finds that high school grade point average is a far stronger predictor of student academic success than SAT scores, contrasting with analyses of highly selective colleges that found the SAT superior. Under-represented minority students were less likely to graduate within six years at every grade point average level.

Theodore Joyce, Mina Afrouzi Khosroshahi, Sarah Truelsch, Kerstin Gentsch, et al. National Bureau of Economic Research
Date Posted:
March 25, 2026
Is Database:
Database
Is Important:
Important

SAT scores are known to be better predictors of college and post-college success in Ivy+ universities. By contrast, this study of a public urban university system with 11 colleges shows that for the 2010–2019 cohort, high school GPA strongly dominates SAT scores.

Do high school grades predict college success better than test scores?

Core argument: In a study of 2010–2019 cohorts at a large public urban university system, high school GPA predicts student academic success far better than the SAT, contrary to analyses of Ivy-plus colleges that found the SAT superior.

Many of the country’s most selective colleges have returned to requiring the SAT, based on evidence that the test not only predicts student success, but facilitates the identification of qualified applicants from disadvantaged backgrounds. The results from our study of a large public urban university system find the opposite: high school grades are a vastly superior predictor of student academic success than is the SAT. We undertake an exercise with binned scatter plots of six year graduation rates against HSGPA [High School Grade Point Average] stratified by URM [under-represented minority] and whether the student received the maximum Pell grant (Figures 1a and 1b). [Note that SAT is included in the regression so the monotonic linear effect of GDP remains after controlling for SAT score]. We find that URM are less likely to graduate in six years at every level of HSGPA than are non-URM. In contrast, we find no similar difference when we stratify the plot by whether the student received the max Pell grant or not, a strong proxy for a low-income household (Figure 1b). The clear takeaway from the analysis of the 2010-2019 cohorts is the dominance of HSGPA in predicting student academic success. The results are in direct contrast to recent high-profile analyses of students from Ivy-plus colleges that demonstrated the superiority of SAT over HSGPA in predicting not only first-year academic outcomes, but post-college success as well.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. In a study of 2010–2019 cohorts at a large public urban university system, high school GPA predicts student academic success far better than the SAT, contrary to analyses of Ivy-plus colleges that found the SAT superior.
  2. Binned scatter plots of six-year graduation rates against high school GPA, controlling for SAT score, show under-represented minority students are less likely to graduate in six years at every level of high school GPA than non-URM students.
  3. Stratifying six-year graduation rates by receipt of the maximum Pell grant, a proxy for a low-income household, shows no similar gap to the one found between under-represented minority and non-URM students.

Related Articles:

  • Diversifying Society’s Leaders? The Determinants and Causal Effects of Admission to Highly Selective Private Colleges — Children from top-1% families are more than 2x as likely as middle-class students with comparable SAT/ACT scores to attend an Ivy-Plus college, with two-thirds of the gap attributable to higher admissions rates. The authors attribute this advantage to legacy preferences, weight on non-academic credentials, and athlete recruitment.
  • Military Officer Quality in the All-Volunteer Force — The authors find a steady decline in U.S. Marine Corps officers' General Classification Test scores, which is statistically associated with the expansion of college attendance and explains 96% of the measured change. They also find a positive association between African American officers and mean test scores, arguing affirmative action has not lowered officer quality.
  • Do Adults Have the Skills They Need to Thrive in a Changing World? — An international assessment of adult skills describes numeracy proficiency levels ranging from counting objects and adding small whole numbers at the lowest level, to extracting information from tables and graphs and performing basic arithmetic with money and percentages at Level 1, up to analysing complex mathematical information and critically evaluating whether data support a claim at Level 5.
  • Test Scores
  • Workforce
    • Education
      • College

The Lost Generation

AI Summary. White men's share of positions across US culture and technology industries declined markedly over roughly a decade: from 48% to 11.9% of lower-level TV writers, 39% to 18% of Harvard humanities tenure-track posts, nearly half to under a third of Google's workforce, and 55.8% to 33.8% of mid-level Amazon managers.

Jacob Savage Compact Magazine
Date Posted:
December 17, 2025
Is Database:
Database
Is Important:
Important

Jacob Savage argues that the widespread discrimination against young white men in “high-status” sectors such as media and tech during the 2010s is a key driver of contemporary political dynamics among young men.

Jacob Savage argues that the widespread discrimination against young white men in “high-status” sectors such as media and...

How much has white men's share of culture and tech jobs fallen?

Core argument: White men fell from 48% of lower-level TV writers in 2011 to 11.9% in 2024, and from 39% of Harvard humanities tenure-track positions in 2014 to 18% in 2023.

In 2011, the year I moved to Los Angeles, white men were 48% of lower-level TV writers; by 2024, they accounted for just 11.9%. The Atlantic’s editorial staff went from 53% male and 89% white in 2013 to 36% male and 66% white in 2024. White men fell from 39% of tenure-track positions in the humanities at Harvard in 2014 to 18% in 2023. The white men shut out of the culture industries didn’t surge into other high-status fields. At Google, white men went from nearly half the workforce in 2014 to less than a third by 2024—a 34% decline. In 2014, at Amazon, entry-level “professionals”—college graduates just starting out—were 42.3% white male. These were the employees who, if they’d advanced normally over the next decade, would be the mid-level managers of today. But mid-level Amazon managers fell from 55.8% white male in 2014 to just 33.8% in 2024—a decline of nearly 40%. In retrospect, 2014 was the hinge, the year DEI became institutionalized across American life.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. White men fell from 48% of lower-level TV writers in 2011 to 11.9% in 2024, and from 39% of Harvard humanities tenure-track positions in 2014 to 18% in 2023.
  2. Mid-level Amazon managers went from 55.8% white male in 2014 to 33.8% in 2024, a decline of nearly 40%, while entry-level Amazon professionals were 42.3% white male in 2014.
  3. At Google, white men fell from nearly half the workforce in 2014 to under a third by 2024, a 34% decline, part of the author's case that 2014 was the hinge year when DEI became institutionalized.

Related Articles:

  • Do Adults Have the Skills They Need to Thrive in a Changing World? — An international assessment of adult skills describes numeracy proficiency levels ranging from counting objects and adding small whole numbers at the lowest level, to extracting information from tables and graphs and performing basic arithmetic with money and percentages at Level 1, up to analysing complex mathematical information and critically evaluating whether data support a claim at Level 5.
  • Military Officer Quality in the All-Volunteer Force — The authors find a steady decline in U.S. Marine Corps officers' General Classification Test scores, which is statistically associated with the expansion of college attendance and explains 96% of the measured change. They also find a positive association between African American officers and mean test scores, arguing affirmative action has not lowered officer quality.
  • US PISA Results By Subpopulation — On the international PISA student assessments, American Asian and White students ranked at the top, American Hispanic students outscored Hispanic students elsewhere, and American Black students performed well. In reading, American Asian students placed first and American White students third.
  • Test Scores
  • Politics
  • Workforce

Twelfth-Grade Math and Reading Scores in U.S. Hit New Low

AI Summary. U.S. twelfth-graders' average math and reading scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress fell to their lowest levels on record, with math the worst since that test began in 2005 and reading below any point since 1992. The share rated proficient slid 2 percentage points to 35% in reading and 22% in math.

Matt Barnum Wall Street Journal
Date Posted:
September 9, 2025
Is Database:
Database
Is Important:
Important

New National Assessment of Educational Progress results show the share of American high school seniors who scored basic or above on national tests fell to the lowest level on record: 68% in reading and 55% in math.

Have U.S. twelfth-grade math and reading scores fallen to record lows?

Core argument: U.S. twelfth-graders' average math score was the worst since the current National Assessment of Educational Progress math test began in 2005, and their reading score fell below any point since that assessment started in 1992.

American high-school seniors’ scores on major math and reading tests fell to their lowest levels on record, according to results released Tuesday by the U.S. Education Department. Twelfth-graders’ average math score was the worst since the current test began in 2005, and reading was below any point since that assessment started in 1992. The share of 12th-graders who were proficient slid by 2 percentage points between 2019 and 2024—to 35% in reading and 22% in math. The results are from tests that are part of the National Assessment of Educational Progress, administered to tens of thousands of students in early 2024. In reading, two-thirds of seniors could determine the purpose of a persuasive essay, but only one in five was able to draw a conclusion from such an essay, supported by the text. In math, 60% of students deduced the population of an area using information on size and density, while just under half correctly turned a real-world scenario into an algebraic expression.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. U.S. twelfth-graders' average math score was the worst since the current National Assessment of Educational Progress math test began in 2005, and their reading score fell below any point since that assessment started in 1992.
  2. The share of U.S. 12th-graders scoring proficient fell 2 percentage points between 2019 and 2024, to 35% in reading and 22% in math, according to results released by the U.S. Education Department.
  3. In reading, two-thirds of seniors could determine the purpose of a persuasive essay but only one in five could draw a text-supported conclusion from it, while in math just under half converted a real-world scenario into an algebraic expression.

Related Articles:

  • Do Adults Have the Skills They Need to Thrive in a Changing World? — An international assessment of adult skills describes numeracy proficiency levels ranging from counting objects and adding small whole numbers at the lowest level, to extracting information from tables and graphs and performing basic arithmetic with money and percentages at Level 1, up to analysing complex mathematical information and critically evaluating whether data support a claim at Level 5.
  • Many Children Left Behind: The 2024 National Assessment of Educational Progress Results Indicate a Five-Alarm Fire — The share of US fourth-grade students meeting the National Assessment of Educational Progress reading proficiency standard fell from 35% in 2019 to 33% in 2022 and 30% in 2024. More fourth-graders now score below the basic level than score proficient.
  • Have Humans Passed Peak Brain Power? — The share of Americans reporting they read a book in the past year has fallen below half, alongside declining performance in numeracy and problem-solving in most countries. The share of adults unable to use mathematical reasoning to evaluate the validity of statements averages 25% in high-income countries and 35% in the US.
  • Test Scores
  • Workforce
    • Education
      • K-12

Standardized Test Scores and Academic Performance at Ivy-Plus Colleges

AI Summary. An analysis of admissions and transcript records at Ivy-Plus colleges finds standardized test scores predict first-year college grades with a normalized slope 4x greater than high school grade point average, controlling for race, gender, and socioeconomic status. The authors find no evidence test scores underpredict college performance for students from less advantaged backgrounds.

John Friedman, Bruce Sacerdote, Douglas Staiger, and Michele Tine National Bureau of Economic Research
Date Posted:
March 18, 2025
Is Database:
Database
Is Important:
Important

Students at Ivy-plus colleges whose SAT/ACT scores were at the 99th percentile had 1st-year college GPAs 0.43 points higher than those who had scored at the 75th percentile, while high school GPAs had little predictive power. @John_N_Friedman

Do standardized test scores predict college grades better than high school GPA?

Core argument: Analyzing admissions and transcript records at multiple Ivy-Plus colleges, the authors find SAT/ACT scores predict first-year college grades with a normalized slope four times greater than high school GPA, conditional on race, gender, and socioeconomic status.

We analyze admissions and transcript records for students at multiple Ivy-Plus colleges to study the relationship between standardized (SAT/ACT) test scores, high school GPA, and first-year college grades. Standardized test scores predict academic outcomes with a normalized slope four times greater than that from high school GPA, all conditional on students’ race, gender, and socioeconomic status. Standardized test scores do not underpredict college performance for students from less advantaged backgrounds. Collectively these results suggest that standardized test scores provide important information to measure applicants’ academic preparation that is not available elsewhere in the application file. While some of the raw correlation between these variables relates to students’ demographic characteristics, much remains even when controlling for these variables. In contrast, high school GPA does not predict academic performance nearly as well. We also find no evidence of bias against students from less advantaged backgrounds, as students from such backgrounds do not outperform (and in some cases underperform) other students with the same test score

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Analyzing admissions and transcript records at multiple Ivy-Plus colleges, the authors find SAT/ACT scores predict first-year college grades with a normalized slope four times greater than high school GPA, conditional on race, gender, and socioeconomic status.
  2. Standardized test scores do not underpredict college performance for students from less advantaged backgrounds, who do not outperform and in some cases underperform other students with the same test score.
  3. Much of the correlation between test scores and academic performance remains after controlling for demographic characteristics, which the authors suggest indicates test scores provide information on applicants' academic preparation not available elsewhere in the application file.

Related Articles:

  • Diversifying Society’s Leaders? The Determinants and Causal Effects of Admission to Highly Selective Private Colleges — Children from top-1% families are more than 2x as likely as middle-class students with comparable SAT/ACT scores to attend an Ivy-Plus college, with two-thirds of the gap attributable to higher admissions rates. The authors attribute this advantage to legacy preferences, weight on non-academic credentials, and athlete recruitment.
  • Standardized Test Scores and Academic Performance at Ivy-Plus Colleges — Using admissions records and first-year grades at multiple Ivy-Plus colleges, the authors find SAT and ACT scores substantially predict college academic success even among students with the same high school grades, while high school grade point average does little to predict it. Conditional on test scores, students from lower- and higher-resourced high schools have virtually identical college grades.
  • Do Adults Have the Skills They Need to Thrive in a Changing World? — An international assessment of adult skills describes numeracy proficiency levels ranging from counting objects and adding small whole numbers at the lowest level, to extracting information from tables and graphs and performing basic arithmetic with money and percentages at Level 1, up to analysing complex mathematical information and critically evaluating whether data support a claim at Level 5.
  • Test Scores
  • Workforce
    • Education

Can Gifted Education Help Higher-Ability Boys from Disadvantaged Backgrounds?

AI Summary. A regression discontinuity study of a large urban school district, where disadvantaged students qualify for gifted status at a lower IQ threshold, estimates that being identified as gifted raises the college entry rate of marginally eligible boys by 28 percentage points, from 46% to 74%. That matches the 74% rate of marginally ineligible girls, closing the gender gap.

David Card, Eric Chyn, and Laura Giuliano National Bureau of Economic Research
Date Posted:
February 21, 2025
Is Database:
Database

Card et al, find that the 25-30 percentage point college enrollment gap between disadvantaged boys and girls with IQs of ~116 closed among students who qualified for a “gifted” program. @EricChyn

Does gifted identification raise college entry for disadvantaged boys?

Core argument: Gifted identification raises the estimated college entry rate of marginally eligible disadvantaged boys by 28 percentage points, from 46% for those narrowly missing the threshold to 74%, in a large urban school district.

We study the effects of being identified as gifted in elementary school on subsequent test scores, courses and grades, and on the probability of entering college, for disadvantaged children in a large urban school district (“the District”). The law specifies a threshold of 130 [IQ] points for non-disadvantaged students, but allows districts to select a lower “Plan B” threshold [116 pts] for FRL and ELL students. The strict IQ threshold for gifted status provides the basis for a regression discontinuity (RD) evaluation of the impacts of being identified as gifted. Figure 6 illustrates how these impacts affect gender gaps by presenting the estimated mean potential outcomes for the complying boys (left side) and complying girls (right side) using an 8-point bandwidth. The estimated college entry rate for male compliers who narrowly miss the gifted threshold is 46%; the 28 ppt treatment effect of passing the threshold raises this to 74%, which equals the rate for female compliers who narrowly miss the threshold - being identified as gifted raises the college entry rate of marginally eligible boys to the same rate as girls.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Gifted identification raises the estimated college entry rate of marginally eligible disadvantaged boys by 28 percentage points, from 46% for those narrowly missing the threshold to 74%, in a large urban school district.
  2. The estimated 74% college entry rate for marginally eligible boys identified as gifted equals the rate for female compliers who narrowly miss the threshold.
  3. The study uses a regression discontinuity design around the IQ threshold for gifted status, 130 points for non-disadvantaged students and a "Plan B" threshold of 116 points for free-lunch and English-learner students.

Related Articles:

  • Do Adults Have the Skills They Need to Thrive in a Changing World? — An international assessment of adult skills describes numeracy proficiency levels ranging from counting objects and adding small whole numbers at the lowest level, to extracting information from tables and graphs and performing basic arithmetic with money and percentages at Level 1, up to analysing complex mathematical information and critically evaluating whether data support a claim at Level 5.
  • Skills and Human Capital in the Labor Market — Labor market earnings are strongly associated with measures of personality traits and preferences, and over the last two decades returns to cognitive skills have been flat or declined in the US, Sweden, and Finland while returns to "soft" skills such as conscientiousness, extraversion, emotional stability, and social skills have grown rapidly.
  • Multidimensional Human Capital and the Wage Structure — The wage return to cognitive skills has declined, from about 10% higher hourly wages per standard deviation of test score in the 1980s and early 1990s to 4.5% in the 2000s and early 2010s, while returns to a bachelor's degree rose. Social skill-intensive occupations grew as a share of US jobs, with faster real wage growth.
  • Test Scores
  • Workforce
    • Education
      • K-12
© Copyright 2026 Coherent Research Institute · All Rights Reserved · Privacy · Terms