Do expensive cities lower living standards for less-educated workers?
Core argument: The authors estimate that a high school drop-out household moving from the most affordable US commuting zone to the most expensive one would see market consumption fall 18.5%.
We build local consumption price indices that vary by commuting zone (CZ) and income group. We find that geographical differences in cost of living are especially large for low-income households. When we estimate the standard of living that low- and high-skill households can expect in each US commuting zone once we account both for geographical variation in cost of living and also in expected income, we find marked differences between low- and high-skill households. For high-skill households, we find no relationship between expected consumption and cost of living, suggesting that college graduates living in cities with high costs of living enjoy a standard of living generally similar to college graduates living in cities with low cost of living. For high school graduates and high school drop-outs, we find a significant negative relationship between consumption and cost of living, indicating that expensive cities offer lower standard of living than more affordable cities. The differences are quantitatively large. A high school drop-out household moving from the most affordable commuting zone to the most expensive one would experience a 18.5% decline in market consumption.

