The Critical Race Theory Fight Isn't "Culture War;" It's Constitutional War
- Date Posted:
- Is Database:
- Database
First Amendment shapes education economics: Compelled speech restrictions affect $700bn public education sector. CRT debate parallels prayer/pledge cases, signals potential funding/resource allocation shifts

"CRT was dreamed up by legal scholars explicitly seeking to subvert the Civil Rights Act and the US Constitution…Let's put this into perspective. Requiring prayer or pledges of allegiance in school has been illegal for decades. If a school can't require your child to pledge allegiance to the American flag, it certainly cannot require a teacher in training or a child in a classroom to pledge allegiance to anti-racism.But schools are doing just that. And they are doing it in direct violation of the First Amendment..When a public school requires students or teachers to say something they don't wish to say or endorse a belief that they don't agree with,then it has unconstitutionally compelled speech. The law here is well settled: Schools can't make teachers affirm a belief in a professional training, and they can't make students affairs a belief in a classroom..”
Kimberly Hermann, "The Critical Race Theory Fight Isn't "Culture War;" It's Constitutional War, American Enterprise Institute, April 2022, https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/The-Critical-Race-Theory-Fight-Isn%E2%80%99t-%E2%80%9CCulture-War%E2%80%9D-It%E2%80%99s-Constitutional-War.pdf


