How do manufacturing and trade size shape vulnerability to weaponized interdependence?
Core argument: China has by far the world’s largest manufacturing sector by value added, while the US and EU are roughly co-equal, each individually smaller than China but larger than China combined.
If we look at manufacturing value added, China has by far the biggest manufacturing sector; the US and EU are roughly co-equal, both individually smaller than China but bigger combined. Netting out intra-EU exports, the EU is the world’s largest exporter of goods and services, with the US a distant third [see figures in gallery]. [The featured image, from the Mercator Institute for China Studies, shows that from 2000–2022 the number of product categories in which the US and EU depended on China rose, while the number in which China depended on them fell. The chart excludes textiles]. The Western economies are increasingly dependent on China, and if anything the US is more dependent than the EU [by this product-count measure]. Who is vulnerable here? The three superpowers are all vulnerable to weaponized interdependence, although apparently China less than the rest. What really scares me is Taiwan. Given time, we can reconstruct a semiconductor supply chain without Taiwan. But the few years it would take would be very ugly.

