Edward Conard

Top Ten New York Times Bestselling Author

  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • “A full-throated defense of economic dynamism.” - The Wall Street Journal
  • “Unintended Consequences provides a provocative interpretation of the causes of the global financial crisis and the policies needed to return to rapid growth. Whether you agree or not, this analysis is well worth reading.” - Nouriel Roubini, New York University; Chairman, Roubini Global Economics
  • “…a very valuable contribution.” - Larry Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury and director of the National Economic Council, president emeritus, Harvard University
  • “…reminds us that inequality sends a signal of what society lacks most, in America’s case, entrepreneurship and risk taking.” - Lawrence Lindsey, CEO, The Lindsey Group, former Director of the National Economic Council
  • “…a very valuable contribution.” - Larry Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury and director of the National Economic Council, president emeritus, Harvard University
  • “Unintended Consequences should be read by anyone who takes for granted the superiority of progressive taxation and has not thought carefully about the trade-offs involved.” - The New Republic
  • “Unintended Consequences represents the most cogent and persuasive analysis of the Financial Crisis to date.” - Andrei Shleifer, 1999 John Bates Clark Medal Winner
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “…serious thinking for serious thinkers. …a thought-provoking blueprint for growing middle- and working-class incomes.” - Mitt Romney, former Governor of Massachusetts
  • “There are an amazing number of good ideas and interesting points made in Unintended Consequences. The thinking underlying it, and the obvious depth of understanding of the author, are very impressive.” - Steven Levitt, coauthor of Freakonomics; 2004 John Bates Clark Medal
Upside of Inequality Oxford Unintended Consequences
Buy the Books
  • Macro Roundup
  • About Roundup
  • About Ed Conard
  • Highlights
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
Edward Conard
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • youtube
  • Email
  • Text Message (SMS)
  • Twitter/X
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp Message
Subscribe to Macro Roundup Emails
  • Mentions 442
  • Primary focus 219
Showing 219 database articles primarily about Business Cycle
Currently filtering by:
  • Remove Business Cycle
  • Remove "primary topics only" restriction
  • Remove 'Database'
Show all 7,218 articles
For whatever topics you select (currently: Business Cycle):
Choose search scope

Your importance filter 'Database' shows fewer articles.

Remove filters to see full article counts

Covid-Era Savings Are Crucial to China's Economic Recovery

Stella Yifan Xie Wall Street Journal
Date Posted:
February 28, 2023
Is Database:
Database

China’s household savings rate surged to 33% in 2022, 3pp above pre-pandemic trend, as families hoarded cash during Covid lockdowns. Big industrial companies added $1.1T in liquid assets annually from 2020-2022, more than double pre-Covid levels.

China's household savings rate surged to 33% in 2022, 3pp above the pre-pandemic trend, as families hoarded cash during Covid lockdowns. This elevated savings level, alongside big industrial companies adding $1.1tn in liquid assets annually from 2020-2022—more than double the $467bn annual increase pre-Covid—positions China for a potential economic rebound. Economists from HSBC and Morgan Stanley anticipate that the end of zero-Covid policies will boost services spending, potentially lifting consumption growth to its pre-pandemic rate of ~8% annually. However, the conversion of these savings into spending is uncertain, as a significant portion is tied up in long-term deposits. The global impact of China's consumption patterns is significant, with many businesses relying on China for growth amid slowing economies in the U.S. and Europe. Despite the potential for recovery, concerns about consumer confidence and the job market persist, influencing the pace at which savings might translate into economic activity.

China's household savings rate was 33% in 2022, 3pp above the pre-pandemic trend, and big industrial companies added $1.1 trillion in liquid assets on average each year, more than double the $467 billion annual increase in the five years before Covid.

“…Chinese families, constrained by Covid lockdowns, hoarded cash and pushed up the country’s household saving rate to a multiyear high of 33% in 2022. Economists from HSBC and Morgan Stanley say the end of China’s strict zero-Covid policies will at minimum fuel a strong recovery in services spending, lifting consumption growth to at least its prepandemic rate of around 8% a year. A large portion of new deposits accumulated by Chinese households last year was locked up in three-year to five-year deposit instruments, which can’t as easily be converted into spending as short-term deposits can, according to a study by research firm Rhodium Group….”

Stella Yifan Xie, "Covid-Era Savings Are Crucial to China’s Economic Recovery,"Wall Street Journal, February 26, 2023, https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-era-savings-are-crucial-to-chinas-economic-recovery-1ee3310b

Covid-Era Savings Are Crucial to China’s Economic Recovery

The strength of China’s economic rebound this year largely hinges on one uncertainty: whether families and large companies are willing to draw down the pile of cash they built up since the start of Covid-19.

Chinese families, constrained by Covid lockdowns, hoarded cash and pushed up the country’s household saving rate to a multiyear high of 33% in 2022, up 3 percentage points from the prepandemic trend in 2019, according to estimates by Goldman Sachs.

Large industrial companies and exporters also socked away money. From 2020 to 2022, big industrial companies, many state-owned, added $1.1 trillion in liquid assets on average each year, more than double the $467 billion annual increase in the five years before Covid hit, according to economists at China International Capital Corp., an investment bank.

In the U.S., excess savings—some from government stimulus—quickly coursed through the economy, but many experts wonder whether China will likewise have a big rebound in spending or investment this year.

Economists from HSBC and Morgan Stanley say the end of China’s strict zero-Covid policies will at minimum fuel a strong recovery in services spending, lifting consumption growth to at least its prepandemic rate of around 8% a year. Initial data from China’s recent Lunar New Year holiday suggest some Chinese consumers are eager to dine out and visit cinemas again.

Other economists feel more skeptical.

They argue that the savings buildup in China is more a reflection of battered confidence, which is unlikely to be reversed quickly as pains from the pandemic linger. Many Chinese consumers remain nervous because of a depressed housing market and an uncertain jobs picture, which could make them save more and spend less for longer.

Covid-Era Savings Are Crucial to China's Economic Recovery: Extended Excerpt Image 1


“It is premature to conclude that excess savings accumulated by households will support revenge spending in a persistent way,” said David Wang, chief China economist at Credit Suisse.

A slow consumption rebound in China could reverberate globally, damping sales for such companies as Nike Inc., Starbucks Corp. and international auto makers, and resulting in lower-than-expected demand for such commodities as copper and nickel. Many businesses are counting on China, which is projected to account for a third of global growth this year as growth in the U.S. and Europe slows, according to the International Monetary Fund.

Swelling household savings helped push China’s current-account surplus to $417.5 billion last year, the highest level since 2008, underscoring just how entrenched the global trade imbalance has been even as the U.S. and other more-advanced economies attempt to reduce reliance on Chinese imports.

It isn’t clear exactly how big China’s savings pile is. Many economists, concerned about data quality in China, use different methods for their calculations.

Goldman Sachs says it believes Chinese families accumulated about three trillion yuan, equivalent to roughly $431 billion, in excess savings, or less than 3% of China’s gross domestic product, from 2020 to 2022. Economists from Nomura and UBS put the figures higher, at 6.1 trillion yuan and up to 4.6 trillion yuan, respectively, or about 5% and close to 4% of GDP in 2022.

While sizable, those figures are lower than in the U.S., where households put away $2.3 trillion in excess savings from 2020 through September 2021, or nearly 10% of GDP in 2021, according to a study published by the Federal Reserve.

A large portion of new deposits accumulated by Chinese households last year was locked up in three-year to five-year deposit instruments, which can’t as easily be converted into spending as short-term deposits can, according to a study by research firm Rhodium Group.

Given that China’s government refrained from handing out checks directly to households during the pandemic, it could take a while before people become more confident in China’s recovery and significantly scale back their saving, said Tao Wang, an economist at UBS.

More relevant to consumers’ spending appetite, economists say, are income growth and the job market, both of which are recovering slowly.

Zhou Changtian, who works at a state-owned publishing house in Shanghai, ended up saving more during the past three years as his family wasn’t able to travel abroad. Even though he isn’t deeply worried about job security, he isn’t keen on splurging, partly because of inflation fears as the economy reopens.

“It used to cost us 1,000 yuan to stock up on meat in the fridge before Covid. Now we have to pay double,” said Mr. Zhou. “I definitely won’t go on a spending spree.”

Some companies are loosening their purse strings in anticipation of a strong economic recovery. Several industrial companies in China have announced big-ticket projects, including Ganfeng Lithium—one of the world’s largest refiners of strategic metal—which last month unveiled a 15 billion yuan ($2.2 billion) investment to build two battery plants in China.

But Larry Hu, chief China economist at Macquarie Group, is cautious about whether corporations have strong incentives to spend. He expects overall capital expenditure to stay flat compared with last year, in part because of uncertainty at export-oriented companies as overseas demand has weakened.

Another concern: Even though big companies were able to put away money by delaying investments during the pandemic, many smaller Chinese businesses, lacking deep pockets, had to spend savings to survive. Many are still on the ropes—or wiped out entirely.

Beijing restaurant operator Nathan Zhang said he hasn’t been able to repay food and wine suppliers at a bistro he owns, because it was forced to shut down or banned from offering dine-in services several times under Covid restrictions. Even though those restrictions have ended, Mr. Zhang estimates that he has lost about 10% to 20% of his regular clientele.

“While we still harbor hope that the worst is behind us, there are still too many uncertainties,” he said.

  • Business Cycle
  • China
  • GDP
    • Savings Glut/Trade Deficit
Previous articleFebruary 28, 2023As China Reopens, Flight of Wealthy Chinese to Singapore Set to Accelerate.@WSJ reports an expected increase this year over the 10,800 wealthy Chinese who left the country in 2022. A recent expatriate noted, “We thought if we don’t leave sooner, we may never be able to.”Next articleMarch 1, 2023Managing DisinflationsA new @ChicagoBooth paper suggests that “raising the inflation target today would be a serious mistake.” The authors estimate that sustaining a disinflation will require unemployment to rise to 5% from January’s 3.4%.
Showing 218 database articles primarily about Business Cycle

3% vs. 60%

AI Summary. Direct lending represents roughly 3% of total U.S. household and business debt, a fraction of the 60% share mortgages held at the peak of the housing bubble.

Torsten Sløk Apollo
Date Posted:
April 8, 2026
Is Database:
Database

Torsten Sløk notes the direct lending market is ~$2T or 3% of household and non-financial debt outstanding. To provide context, he shows that in 2006, on the eve of the crisis, mortgages accounted for ~60% of such debt.

Core argument: Direct lending represents a small but growing alternative to traditional bank financing for businesses and households.

The direct lending market is roughly $2 trillion, or about 3% of total debt outstanding for US households and businesses. By comparison, mortgages accounted for about 60% of total household and corporate debt at the peak of the housing bubble in 2006.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Direct lending represents a small but growing alternative to traditional bank financing for businesses and households.
  2. The mortgage market’s dominance has shifted dramatically since the 2006 housing peak, reducing systemic risk concentration.
  3. Non-bank lenders now capture meaningful market share in credit provision across the economy.

Related Articles:

  • JPMorgan Marking Down Loan Portfolios Of Private Credit Groups — JPMorgan has marked down the value of loans made to software companies by private credit groups. These loans are collateral for JPM’s lending to private…
  • Data Update 7 for 2026: Debt and Taxes — Damodaran argues that the private credit industry’s increasing financing of the AI buildout is another sign that “a shakeout is overdue, which will…
  • Business Cycle
  • GDP
    • Financial Markets

Top 10% of Earners Drive a Growing Share of US Consumer Spending

Jonnelle Marte Bloomberg
Date Posted:
September 17, 2025
Is Database:
Database

Mark Zandi finds Americans in the top 10% of the income distribution accounted for 49.2% of consumer spending in Q2, the highest level since 1989.

Consumers in the top 10% of the income distribution accounted for 49.2% of total spending in the second quarter, up from 48.5% in the first quarter, reaching the highest level in data going back to 1989, according to an analysis of Federal Reserve data by Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody’s Analytics. In contrast, the bottom 80% of the income distribution, or consumers making less than roughly $175,000 a year, have seen their spending merely keep pace with inflation since the pandemic.

Related Articles:

  • The U.S. Economy Depends More Than Ever on Rich People — The top 10% of US earners now account for nearly half of all personal spending, according to Moody’s @Markzandi, up from 36% three decades ago. “The finances…
  • To Understand America Today, Study the Zero-Sum Mindset — Zero-sum thinking, in terms of political and policy views is strongly associated with lower levels of intergenerational upward mobility. @S_Stantcheva notes…
  • Zero-Sum Thinking and the Roots of U.S. Political Divides — Zero-sum thinking in terms of political and policy views is strongly associated with lower levels of intergenerational upward mobility. @S_Stantcheva…
  • Business Cycle
  • GDP
  • Workforce
    • Inequality

Litigation Nation, Engineering Empire

Jonathon Sine Cogitations
Date Posted:
September 2, 2025
Is Database:
Database
Is Important:
Important

Jonathon Sine argues China “is moving beyond its breakneck industrial prime, facing similar dilemmas to those America confronted in the 1960s and 70s.” The ratio of science/engineering to humanities undergraduate majors is 2:1 in both the PRC and US.

Dan Wang’s “big idea” [is] “China is an engineering state, building big at breakneck speed, in contrast to the United States’ lawyerly society, blocking everything it can, good and bad.” I re-group US college majors according to Chinese disciplines to allow for rough comparison. Surprisingly, the ratio of science/engineering to humanities/social sciences is 2:1, the same as in China (if one groups management with science/engineering, as I also do for China). As with China today, America’s breakneck building phase was decidedly winding down by the 1960s. Urbanization went from 40% in 1900 to 70% by 1960, and grew much more incrementally over the next 60 years to 85% by 2020. The country simply did not need to continue building dams, expressways, and energy production facilities at breakneck pace. It became much more a matter of maintaining and upgrading (which has not gone well, at least according to the American Society of Civil Engineers’ report card). The American [building/investment slowdown that started after the 1970s] may be more about structural economic shifts than lawyers.

Related Articles:

  • Industrial Colossus: China vs 1950s America — Jonathan Sine argues China’s global manufacturing share is likely near its peak as growth has slowed from 1.5% to 0.5% btw 2010 and today due to…
  • The Real China Model — Electricity supplies nearly 30% of China’s energy use today and is growing at an annual rate of 6%. In the US, electricity accounts for 22% of energy use and…
  • America’s Housing Affordability Crisis and the Decline of Housing Supply — Why are constant-quality house prices 15% above their pre-2007 peak? Ed Glaeser notes that US housing grew just 0.6% annually in the 2010s, down from 4% in the…
  • Business Cycle
  • GDP
    • Growth

How America’s AI Boom Is Squeezing The Rest Of The Economy

Economist Staff The Economist
Date Posted:
August 19, 2025
Is Database:
Database
Is Important:
Important

As AI-related investment has risen since 2023, residential and nonresidential investment have declined or flatlined. This may suggest that a relatively rate-insensitive AI buildout is crowding out more interest-sensitive forms of investment.

Something like a sixth of the 2% rise in American real GDP over the past year has come from investments in computer and communications equipment, including chips, and data centres. Add in the grid upgrades to power AI models, plus the intellectual-property value of the software itself, and one estimate puts the boom’s contribution to real GDP growth at 40%. The trouble is that the very sector powering so much of America’s economic growth is squeezing the rest of its output. Housebuilders, for instance, cannot afford to be blithe about higher borrowing costs. Data centres have also constrained the rest of the economy by keeping energy prices high. Average American electricity bills have risen by 7% so far in 2025, at least in part due to the extra strain data centres have put on the grid. Real consumption has flatlined since December. Housebuilding has slumped, as has non-AI business investment.

Related Articles:

  • Honey, AI Capex is Eating the Economy — Kedrosky estimates capex related to the datacenter buildout is ~20% of the railroad buildout in the 1880s and rising, though he cautions AI datacenter…
  • Back to Our Regularly Scheduled Programming — The four major “hyperscalers” continue to have a large gap btw AI spending ($440B in 2024 and $596B in 2025) and AI revenues. The four firms now account for…
  • The AI Boom’s Hidden Risk to the Economy — Btw 2016 and 2023, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft’s free cash flow and net earnings ~ tracked each other; since 2023, net earnings have risen 73%…
  • Business Cycle
  • GDP
  • Productivity
    • Innovation/Research
    • Investment

Is it Over?

Joseph Wang Fed Guy Blog
Date Posted:
August 18, 2025
Is Database:
Database

Following tepid reactions to the release of GTP-5, Joe Wang observes, “It is looking more like companies are spending hundreds of billions on rapidly depreciating GPUs that produce a commoditized product that most clients only modestly benefit from.”

GPT-5 users widely expressed disappointment in the capabilities of the new release, which seemed in some ways a step back. This sentiment is reflected in benchmarks that show a modest improvement in capabilities since the significant improvement in version 4 released two years ago. In addition, the benchmarks suggest a broader convergence in the capabilities of AI models. Commentary suggests this could be due to inherent limitations in the LLM technology and exhaustion of new training data. AI is fascinating technology, but it may not justify the enormous sums spent in its pursuit. It is looking more like companies are spending hundreds of billions on rapidly depreciating GPUs that produce a commoditized product that most clients only modestly benefit from. The entire macro landscape would look very different without the support of the AI boom.

Related Articles:

  • Honey, AI Capex is Eating the Economy — Kedrosky estimates capex related to the datacenter buildout is ~20% of the railroad buildout in the 1880s and rising, though he cautions AI datacenter…
  • Back to Our Regularly Scheduled Programming — The four major “hyperscalers” continue to have a large gap btw AI spending ($440B in 2024 and $596B in 2025) and AI revenues. The four firms now account for…
  • AI’s $600B Question — .@DavidCahn6 at @sequoia argues that because of lack of pricing power and rapidly improving chip technologies, multi-$B investments in current-generation GPUs…
  • Business Cycle
  • GDP
    • Financial Markets
  • Productivity
    • Innovation/Research
    • Investment

US Households and Firms Are in Great Shape

Torsten Sløk Apollo
Date Posted:
March 31, 2025
Is Database:
Database

​​Torsten Sløk notes that US household and banking sector debt has fallen to its lowest level in decades as a % of GDP, while corporate leverage has moved sideways. “The bottom line is that the private sector in the US is in incredibly good shape.”

Household sector leverage and banking sector leverage have declined significantly since 2008. Over the same period, federal government leverage has increased significantly, and corporate leverage has moved sideways. The bottom line is that the private sector in the US is in incredibly good shape.

Related Articles:

  • Global Debt Report 2025 — Over the next two years, the US must refinance debt exceeding 25% of GDP at sharply higher rates. Treasuries issued in 2024 carried an average yield…
  • The Long-Term Budget Outlook: 2025 to 2055 — Debt as a % of GDP will hit an all-time high of 107% in 2029 up from 98% of GDP in 2024, @USCBO forecasts. The forecast assumes 10-year Treasuries will yield…
  • Our Thoughts on Large US Deficits and Their Impact on Bond Yields — Bridgewater believes an increase in the deficit to 7-8% of GDP will not put undue pressure on bond yields. They argue rates reflect total credit creation…
  • Business Cycle
  • Fiscal Policy
    • Fiscal Deficits
    • Government Spending
  • GDP
© Copyright 2026 Coherent Research Institute · All Rights Reserved · Privacy · Terms