How much of the value a large retailer creates goes to shareholders?
Core argument: Amazon's 2020 shareholder letter estimates the company generated $301bn in value, with 7%, or $21.3bn, accruing to shareholders as net income, while employees received $91bn in compensation and benefits.
In 2020, Amazon generated a consumer surplus of $301bn, with only 7% of this value, or $21.3bn, accruing to shareholders as net income. Employees received $91bn in compensation and benefits, while third-party sellers earned an estimated $25bn. Amazon's consumer customers benefited from $126bn in value creation, primarily through time savings, with 200m Prime members saving 75 hours annually valued at $10 per hour. AWS [Amazon Web Services] contributed an additional $38bn in customer value by offering a 30% cost reduction compared to on-premises solutions. This distribution of value highlights Amazon's significant impact on various stakeholders beyond its shareholders, emphasizing the broader economic implications of its business model.



Ed Comment:I’ve always said/agreed that it (i.e., how much producers produce for customers to put a dollar in their own pocket) is probably 20:1, but rounded it down to 5:1 so the liberals (who completely ignore critical truths like this, like they pretend poverty is 40mm by not counting half the income we give them) won’t disagree (and then cut it to 3:1 to remove recapture by the rich). This says 14:1 piling conservative assumptions onto conservative assumptions. Given the growth of Amazon, presumably they provide a higher multiple than the marginal producer. It’s true some of this would be created by traditional sellers, but so would the profits, albeit probably lower, increasing the multiple.