Comparing Past and Present Inflation
- Date Posted:
- Is Database:
- Database
Adjusting for changes in how housing inflation is measured reveals that achieving target inflation today requires disinflation similar to the Volcker era.
This paper highlights that the way that housing inflation was measured in the CPI made previous inflationary cycles look more volatile and responsive to Fed policy. We draw two sets of conclusions. First, our observations imply that the current inflation regime is closer to that of the late 1970s than it may at first appear. In particular, the rate of CPI disinflation engineered in the Volcker-era is significantly less when measured using today’s treatment of housing. In order to return to 2 percent core CPI today, we need nearly the same 5 percentage points of disinflation that Volcker achieved. In its pre-1983 form, shelter inflation would decline mechanically as interest rate increases subsided, adding fuel to rapid disinflations. Not only is the current housing component of CPI unlikely to decline swiftly, but recent research indicates that housing inflation is likely to continue growing in the coming monthsWith private sector rent growth currently still at 16 percent, residential inflation is likely to move towards 7 percent by the end of 2022, contributing almost 3 percentage points to core CPI inflation. Compared to previous inflationary cycles, housing will thus serve as a significant hindrance to rapid disinflation whereas it used to move the official series substantially lower.Second, our estimates suggest that past inflation cycles were more volatile than today’s due to the greater weight of transitory goods components in past indices. With current procedures, the inflation taken out of the system in 1950s and 1970s looks significantly more modest. Overall, some optimistic interpretations which underplay the magnitude of the required disinflation to return to trend inflation today are called into question by the analysis in this paper. Our estimates suggest that the current inflation rate is closer to the peak of other cycles than the official CPI data suggest. Figure 3 shows that the peak of the Volcker-era inflation (March 1980), currently understood to have been at 14.8 percent, is only 11.4 percent when adjusted for the switch from homeownership costs to OER. The growth in core CPI at its peak in June 1980 falls from 13.6 percent to 9.1 percent when measured using the OER method as seen in Figure 4. The large differences between the official and adjusted series reflect both the substantial weight of OER in the index, especially in core CPI, and the lower peaks of estimated OER relative to homeownership costs. From a low of 14.5 percent weight in 1983, as Americans have shifted more of their consumption towards housing, OER has risen to represent 24.3 percent of overall CPI and 30.6 percent of core CPI in 2022. While past inflation peaks are lower using the consistent methodology, the average inflation rate pre-1983 would also have been lower. Our estimates show that the mean headline inflation rate between 1949 and 1983 is 0.4 percentage points lower when accounting for the shift to OEROne thing that is not called into question is the great work performed by the people of the Bureau of Labor Statistics; our corrections do not at all denigrate current processes, they are just a tool for better intertemporal contextualization. Most importantly, prior to 1983 measurement of shelter inflation was mechanically responsive to Federal Reserve interest rate policy via mortgage rates. This method made pre-1983 peak CPI inflation measures, especially during the Volcker-era, artificially high at the beginning of the tightening cycle, and declines look artificially fast. Using publicly available Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data for the post-war period, we develop new estimates of CPI headline and core inflation that can be better compared across time. The full series is available on our website athttp://larrysummers.com/category/inflation/. Our analysis reveals that current inflation, especially core inflation, is considerably closer to previous peaks than in the official series. Official core CPI inflation peaked at 13.6 percent in June 1980, whereas we estimate that core inflation was 9.1 percent in that same month when adjusting for the treatment of shelter inflation. Our estimates also suggest that the local trough of core CPI inflation in 1983 was considerably higher than originally reported. Overall, these estimates imply that the rate of core CPI disinflation caused by Volcker-era policies is significantly lower when measured using the current treatment of housing: only 5 percentage points of decline instead of 11 percentage points in the official CPI statistics. To return to 2 percent core CPI today, we thus need disinflation of a similar magnitude as Chairman Volcker achieved. We show that due to the greater weight of transitory goods components —especially food and apparel— in the index of the 1940s and 1950s, past inflation spikes were higher and more short-lived than today’s. When using current weights, we estimate that the peak of core CPI inflation in June 1951 falls from 7.2 to 5 percent, and the peak of headline CPI inflation falls from 9.4 to just 3.3 percent. These two points serve as a caution against overly optimistic forecasts of an inexpensive disinflation in the current cycle —the disinflation that needs to be achieved now is large by historical standards.
Methodology
“…To better contextualize the current run-up in inflation, this paper constructs new historical series for CPI headline and core inflation that are more consistent with current practices and expenditure shares for the entirety of the post-war period. Using publicly available Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data for the post-war period, we develop new estimates of CPI headline and core inflation that can be better compared across time. The full series is available on our website athttp://larrysummers.com/category/inflation/. Our analysis reveals that current inflation, especially core inflation, is considerably closer to previous peaks than in the official series. Official core CPI inflation peaked at 13.6 percent in June 1980, whereas we estimate that core inflation was 9.1 percent in that same month when adjusting for the treatment of shelter inflation….”
Implication
“…Our estimates also suggest that the local trough of core CPI inflation in 1983 was considerably higher than originally reported. Overall, these estimates imply that the rate of core CPI disinflation caused by Volcker-era policies is significantly lower when measured using the current treatment of housing: only 5 percentage points of decline instead of 11 percentage points in the official CPI statistics. To return to 2 percent core CPI today, we thus need disinflation of a similar magnitude as Chairman Volcker achieved….”
Other Comparisons
“…Similar issues affect conclusions drawn from comparisons of current inflation with other periods of elevated inflation. Recent work suggests that the years following World War II have strong similarities to the current inflation environment (e.g., Rouse et al., 2021; DeLong, 2022). We show that due to the greater weight of transitory goods components —especially food and apparel— in the index of the 1940s and 1950s, past inflation spikes were higher and more short-lived than today’s. When using current weights, we estimate that the peak of core CPI inflation in June 1951 falls from 7.2 to 5 percent, and the peak of headline CPI inflation falls from 9.4 to just 3.3 percent. These two points serve as a caution against overly optimistic forecasts of an inexpensive disinflation in the current cycle —the disinflation that needs to be achieved now is large by historical standards…”
The Evidence
“…Our estimates suggest that the current inflation rate is closer to the peak of other cycles than the official CPI data suggest. Figure 3 shows that the peak of the Volcker-era inflation (March 1980), currently understood to have been at 14.8 percent, is only 11.4 percent when adjusted for the switch from homeownership costs to OER. The growth in core CPI at its peak in June 1980 falls from 13.6 percent to 9.1 percent when measured using the OER method as seen in Figure 4. The large differences between the official and adjusted series reflect both the substantial weight of OER in the index, especially in core CPI, and the lower peaks of estimated OER relative to homeownership costs. From a low of 14.5 percent weight in 1983, as Americans have shifted more of their consumption towards housing, OER has risen to represent 24.3 percent of overall CPI and 30.6 percent of core CPI in 2022. While past inflation peaks are lower using the consistent methodology, the average inflation rate pre-1983 would also have been lower. Our estimates show that the mean headline inflation rate between 1949 and 1983 is 0.4 percentage points lower when accounting for the shift to OER. More broadly speaking, past inflationary cycles would have been less volatile using the consistent methodology that uses OER. The pace of reflation during the cycle upswings, and the pace of disinflation during the cycle downswings are lower under today’s methodology, as summarized in Table 1.These differences imply that the responsiveness of the CPI to monetary policy was considerably lower during the 1960s and 1970s than the official CPI statistics suggest. We stress that any consequences of the difference in measurement are larger for core CPI than for headline CPI, due to the considerably larger weight of OER in core CPI..”
Marijn Bolhuis, Judd Cramer and Lawrence Summers, "Comparing Past and Present Inflation," National Bureau Of Economic Research, June 2022, https://www.nber.org/papers/w30116


