Do education school reading lists show a political slant?
Core argument: An analysis of syllabi at the education schools of the University of North Carolina, the University of Michigan, and the University of Wisconsin finds a left-leaning bias across 101 assigned reading selections.
An analysis of syllabi from leading education schools at UNC, Michigan, and Wisconsin reveals a significant left-leaning bias in assigned readings. Of 101 reading selections, 33 were misrepresented as scientific, while 27 explicitly displayed political intent. The remaining 41 selections, though seemingly apolitical, often featured contributors with leftist affiliations, such as Pierre Bourdieu and Michel Foucault. This trend suggests a successful "long march" through education schools, aiming to transform educational paradigms towards a collectivist vision. The implications for future educators and policy makers are profound, potentially influencing the ideological landscape of education and its economic impact on workforce development and innovation.

