How much does inflation measurement change estimates of income growth and mobility?
Core argument: The typical 40-year-old's pre-tax family income rose 15% between 1979 and 2019 using Chetty's methods, but 52% when adjusted for the cost of living with the MACPI, and 73% after also adjusting for changing family size.
The [Chetty] data allow for annual estimates of the typical (“median”) 40-year-old’s family income. Using the methods that produced Chetty’s headline results, the income typical of a 40-year-old rose by just 15% between 1979 and 2019 (both business cycle peaks). However, using the MACPI to adjust for the rise in the cost of living, the increase was 52%. If we also adjust for changing family size, the increase was 73%. These estimates all involve pre-tax income and exclude government benefits. It's true that no matter what the measure, absolute mobility has fallen over the long run. While absolute mobility is still down 20 percentage points since 1979, in 2023 the rate was 72%. While doomers may be tempted to take a win (a loss?) where they can get it, equating absolute mobility with the American Dream is a mistake. The [Chetty] research shows that Americans who grew up poor have the highest rates of absolute mobility—over 80% by even their preferred measure, compared with less than 20% for adults who grew up with the richest parents. It is, after all, easier to exceed a low parental income than to exceed a high one. It would be difficult, however, to find adults raised poor who would lament that their children are unfortunate for having a higher living standard than they did but a lower likelihood of moving up even further when they grow up. The odds remain solid that their kids will move up again; to the extent those odds diminish, it’s because the parents rose so high that their children could unlikely repeat such a leap.




