Edward Conard

Top Ten New York Times Bestselling Author

  • “A full-throated defense of economic dynamism.” - The Wall Street Journal
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “…a very valuable contribution.” - Larry Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury and director of the National Economic Council, president emeritus, Harvard University
  • “…a comprehensive explanation of the modern economy.” - Julian Robertson, Founder, Tiger Management
  • “…reminds us that inequality sends a signal of what society lacks most, in America’s case, entrepreneurship and risk taking.” - Lawrence Lindsey, CEO, The Lindsey Group, former Director of the National Economic Council
  • “Unintended Consequences is full of substance, it is one of the must-read books of the year, and once I finish it I will be giving it a second read through right away.” - Tyler Cowen, Professor, George Mason University
  • “…a must-read for serious students of economic policy.” - Glenn Hubbard, Dean, Columbia Business School, and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
  • “…a very valuable contribution.” - Larry Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury and director of the National Economic Council, president emeritus, Harvard University
  • “…reminds us that inequality sends a signal of what society lacks most, in America’s case, entrepreneurship and risk taking.” - Lawrence Lindsey, CEO, The Lindsey Group, former Director of the National Economic Council
  • “…a must-read for serious students of economic policy.” - Glenn Hubbard, Dean, Columbia Business School, and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
  • “Unintended Consequences should be read by anyone who takes for granted the superiority of progressive taxation and has not thought carefully about the trade-offs involved.” - The New Republic
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
Upside of Inequality Oxford Unintended Consequences
Buy the Books
  • Macro Roundup
  • About Roundup
  • About Ed Conard
  • Highlights
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
Edward Conard
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • youtube

Macro Roundup

  • Email
  • Text Message (SMS)
  • Twitter/X
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp Message
Subscribe to Macro Roundup Emails
Select topics to choose: articles that mention them (broader) or articles mainly about them (focused)
  • Mentions 0
  • Primary focus 0
Showing all 7,309 Macro Roundup articles
When you search for any topic (like GDP, Inflation, or Banking), choose:
Choose search scope

Monday, June 26, 2023

Government Debt and Debt Servicing Costs Rising

AI Summary. 25% of all outstanding US government debt has been added since the start of 2020, and with higher debt levels and higher interest rates, debt servicing costs have risen from about $1bn per day to nearly $2bn per day.

Torsten Sløk Apollo
Date Posted:
June 26, 2023

Torsten Sløk @apolloglobal notes that 25% of American government debt outstanding has been added since the start of 2020. Federal debt servicing costs have almost doubled in that period because of higher interest rates.

Have rising debt levels and interest rates doubled daily debt servicing costs?

Core argument: Twenty-five percent of all outstanding US government debt has been added since the beginning of 2020.

Twenty-five percent of all US government debt outstanding has been added since the beginning of 2020. And with higher debt levels and higher interest rates, debt servicing costs have increased from $1 billion per day in 2020 to almost $2 billion per day in 2023, see charts below.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Twenty-five percent of all outstanding US government debt has been added since the beginning of 2020.
  2. US debt servicing costs have risen from $1 billion per day in 2020 to almost $2 billion per day in 2023, with higher debt levels and higher interest rates.
  • Fiscal Deficits
  • Fiscal Policy

Who Has Been Buying U.S. Treasury Debt?

AI Summary. Net purchases of U.S. Treasury securities by the "households and nonprofits" category have soared, more than offsetting sales and redemptions by money market funds, the Federal Reserve, and banks; much of this buying likely reflects hedge funds. The composition of Treasury financing has shifted dramatically as bond prices fell.

Matt Klein The Overshoot
Date Posted:
June 26, 2023

.@M_C_Klein argues that hedge funds have replaced the Federal Reserve as the marginal buyer of Treasuries as interest rates have risen.

Who is buying U.S. Treasury debt as other holders pull back?

Core argument: Net purchases of marketable Treasury securities by "households and nonprofits" have soared, more than offsetting sales and redemptions by money market funds, the Federal Reserve, and banks, with much of that buying likely reflecting hedge funds.

Net purchases of marketable securities by “households and nonprofits” have soared, more than offsetting sales and redemptions by money market funds, the Federal Reserve, and banks. In practice, much of this buying likely reflected purchases by hedge funds. The U.S. Treasury borrowed about as much in 2022Q2-2023Q1 ($1.02 trillion) as it did in 2018 ($1.13 trillion) and 2019 ($1.06 trillion). The sources of financing have changed dramatically as bond prices plunged. Compared to 2019 or the first years of the pandemic, the newest crop of buyers most closely resembles those who stepped up in 2018, when rising interest rates encouraged relative value hedge funds and securities dealers to fill in for the Federal Reserve as it ran down its bond portfolio.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Net purchases of marketable Treasury securities by "households and nonprofits" have soared, more than offsetting sales and redemptions by money market funds, the Federal Reserve, and banks, with much of that buying likely reflecting hedge funds.
  2. The U.S. Treasury borrowed about $1.02 trillion in 2022Q2–2023Q1, roughly matching the $1.13 trillion borrowed in 2018 and $1.06 trillion in 2019, while the sources of financing changed dramatically as bond prices plunged.
  3. The newest crop of Treasury buyers most closely resembles those of 2018, when rising interest rates encouraged relative value hedge funds and securities dealers to fill in for the Federal Reserve as it ran down its bond portfolio.
  • Fiscal Deficits
  • Fiscal Policy

Financial Storm Bears Down On US Commercial Real Estate

AI Summary. Broker JLL estimates New York office buildings have lost $76bn in value from their most recent sales prices, with 73 worth less than their loan balances. One broker estimates only the top 10% of New York offices are not distressed by debt levels or occupancy, though low sales volumes may mask the damage.

Joshua Oliver and Joshua Chaffin Financial Times
Date Posted:
June 26, 2023

Real estate broker @JLL estimates that office buildings in New York have lost at least $76B in value from their most recent sales prices, and estimates that 90% of office buildings are distressed, either in terms of debt or occupancy.

How much value have office buildings lost since their last sales?

Core argument: JLL estimates New York office buildings have lost $76bn in value from their most recent sales prices, with 73 now worth less than their outstanding loan balances.

Broker JLL estimates that office buildings in New York have lost $76B in value from their most recent sales prices. Seventy-three were now worth less than their loan balances. An exception is a new group of the most modern and luxurious offices, such as SL Green’s One Vanderbilt, which are fetching record rents. More common are buildings like 1330 Avenue of the Americas, recently sold by Blackstone and RXR for $320M, a 1/3 less than the price it commanded in 2006. One broker estimated that only the top 10% of office buildings in New York were not distressed — either in terms of the level of debt or occupancy. “I think we are on the front edge of forced sales,” this person said.  The financial damage may be masked because so few buildings have been sold in the past year, with deal volumes for commercial real estate down by more than half year on year in the first quarter.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. JLL estimates New York office buildings have lost $76bn in value from their most recent sales prices, with 73 now worth less than their outstanding loan balances.
  2. Blackstone and RXR sold 1330 Avenue of the Americas for $320m, a third less than its 2006 price, while first-quarter commercial real estate deal volumes fell by more than half year on year, which may mask the financial damage.
  • Financial Markets
  • GDP

Accumulated Savings During the Pandemic: An International Comparison with Historical Perspective

AI Summary. The authors construct measures of excess household savings accumulated during the COVID-19 pandemic and find they have been unwound in the United States, declined in advanced foreign economies, and slowed in emerging market economies. Past recessions featured smaller increases in excess savings and greater persistence in the accumulated stock.

Francois de Soyres, Dylan Moore and Julio Ortiz Federal Reserve Board
Date Posted:
June 26, 2023

.@FSoyres @FedResearch estimates that excess savings have come down much faster in the United States than in other advanced economies.

Have households spent down the excess savings built up during the pandemic?

Core argument: Excess savings accumulated during the COVID-19 pandemic were unprecedented in size but have been unwound in the United States, declined in advanced foreign economies, and slowed in emerging market economies, according to the authors' constructed measure.

Household savings rates spiked across several countries following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. We construct a measure of excess savings for the United States, advanced foreign economies, and emerging market economies, and compare the COVID-19 recession to past recessionary episodes. While accumulated excess savings during COVID-19 were unprecedented in size, they have been unwound in the United States, declined in the advanced foreign economies, and slowed in the emerging market economies. Relative to COVID-19, past episodes are characterized by smaller increases in excess savings and greater persistence in the stock of excess savings. Absent any further shocks to disposable income or savings behavior, our analysis suggests that the accumulated average AFE excess savings should be unwound by the end of the year.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Excess savings accumulated during the COVID-19 pandemic were unprecedented in size but have been unwound in the United States, declined in advanced foreign economies, and slowed in emerging market economies, according to the authors' constructed measure.
  2. Past recessionary episodes featured smaller increases in excess savings and greater persistence in the stock of excess savings than the COVID-19 recession.
  3. The authors' analysis suggests accumulated average advanced-foreign-economy excess savings should be unwound by the end of the year, absent further shocks to disposable income or savings behavior.

Related Articles:

  • The Rise and Fall of Pandemic Excess Savings — Researchers estimate US households accumulated about $2.1tn in excess savings above the pre-pandemic trend before drawing them down, with cumulative drawdowns of $1.6tn leaving roughly $500bn remaining. If recent drawdown rates persist, the authors project remaining excess savings would continue supporting household spending for several more months.
  • America’s “Excess” Household Savings Are Going Away — Americans drew down more than $1tn of "excess" savings accumulated since the pandemic began, eliminating over half the surplus, and at that pace the entire stock would be exhausted within a year. The drawdown is attributed to weak dividend and interest income, as companies favored buybacks, and to large capital gains tax bills owed by wealthy households.
  • Business Cycle
  • GDP

The Neoclassical Growth of China

AI Summary. China's per capita GDP growth path closely tracks those of Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan from similar starting income levels, indicating nothing unusual about its growth rate. The authors' model projects China's per capita GDP will level off at about 41% of the US level, reflecting a slowdown in productivity catch-up.

Jesús Fernández-Villaverde, Lee Ohanian and Wen Yao National Bureau of Economic Research
Date Posted:
June 26, 2023

.@lee_ohanian @AEIEcon finds that China’s pattern of growth in per capita GDP matches that of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan at earlier stages of their development. He forecasts that China’s per capita GDP will asymptote at 41% of the US level ~2050.

Is China's growth path typical of other East Asian economies?

Core argument: A model with a fitted total factor productivity catch-up process predicts China's per capita GDP will asymptote to about 41% of the U.S. level around 2050, reflecting a substantial slowdown in China's observed TFP catch-up.

Figure 3.1 shows real GDP for China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, in which each economy begins at approximately the same per capita income level. The most striking aspect of these data is that the time path of China’s per capita GDP is remarkably similar to those of the three other East Asian miracle economies. After 25 years of becoming middle-income economies, China, Japan, and Taiwan achieved nearly the same per capita real GDP level. The one exception is Korea, which was somewhat ahead of the other three at that point in time. These data show that there is nothing unusual about China’s real GDP growth rate relative to the experiences of these other economies. We use the model and the fitted TFP catch-up process to predict that China’s relative per capita GDP level will asymptote to about 41% of the U.S. level around 2050, reflecting a substantial slowdown in China’s observed TFP catch-up in recent years.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. A model with a fitted total factor productivity catch-up process predicts China's per capita GDP will asymptote to about 41% of the U.S. level around 2050, reflecting a substantial slowdown in China's observed TFP catch-up.
  2. China's per capita GDP time path closely resembles those of Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan when each economy is aligned from approximately the same starting income level, showing nothing unusual about China's real GDP growth rate.
  3. China, Japan, and Taiwan reached nearly the same per capita real GDP level 25 years after becoming middle-income economies, with Korea somewhat ahead of the other three at that point.

Related Articles:

  • How Soon and At What Height Will China’s Economy Peak? — Goldman Sachs now projects China's economy will not overtake America's until 2035 and will peak at only 14% larger, down from an earlier projection of surpassing the US in 2026 and being over 50% larger by mid-century. Capital Economics argues China will reach 90% of America's size in 2035 and then lose ground.
  • China
  • GDP
    • Growth

Portfolio Nuclear

AI Summary. The US is in its fifth year of net energy independence, with domestic oil and gas production at all-time highs across four consecutive administrations. Wind and solar now supply 15% of the grid, allowing more coal and liquefied natural gas to be exported.

Gregor MacDonald The Gregor Letter
Date Posted:
June 26, 2023

The United States is now likely on its fifth year of net energy independence @GregorMacdonald

Has US energy independence persisted across four consecutive administrations?

Core argument: The US is in its fifth year of net energy independence, a trend that began late in the Bush administration, strengthened under Obama, and has continued through the Trump and Biden administrations.

The US is now working on its fifth year of (net) energy independence. The trend began late in the Bush administration, got going more strongly during the Obama administration, and has stayed on trend through the Trump and now Biden administrations. None of these four administrations undertook any policies at all that crimped, suppressed, or held back US domestic production of oil and gas, which are now once again at all time highs. The big game changer came under Obama, when wind and solar ignited. Today, the 15% share of wind and solar on the grid means the US can export even more coal, and more natural gas, through LNG. That too—the LNG export approval wave—also started under Obama in 2014, and it has gone from strength to strength.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. The US is in its fifth year of net energy independence, a trend that began late in the Bush administration, strengthened under Obama, and has continued through the Trump and Biden administrations.
  2. Wind and solar supply 15% of the US grid, which the author argues frees the US to export more coal and more natural gas as LNG.
  3. US oil and gas production stands at all-time highs, and the author states that none of the four administrations since Bush enacted policies suppressing domestic output, with the LNG export approval wave beginning under Obama in 2014.
  • Energy

Tuesday, June 27, 2023

Which Households Are Most Exposed to the Inflation “Tax”?

AI Summary. Treasury holdings as a share of net worth reach 6% among the oldest and wealthiest households, while for middle wealth quintiles the share rises from young adulthood to middle age and then declines. On this measure, older, wealthiest households and middle-aged, middle-wealth households are the most exposed to the implicit inflation tax.

Yu-Ting Chiang and Jesse LaBelle Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Date Posted:
June 27, 2023

.@YuTingChiang4 and @JesseLaBelle11 find that overall households in the top quintile of net worth, who tend to be older, have taken the biggest hit from inflation due to their Treasury holdings.

Which households are most exposed to the inflation tax?

Core argument: Treasury holdings peak at 6% of net worth for the oldest and wealthiest households, in the fifth wealth quintile.

For households in the top wealth quintile, Treasuries become a more important element of their balance sheets, topping at 6% for the oldest and wealthiest group (the fifth quintile). However, for the second to fourth wealth quintiles, holdings of Treasuries as a share of net worth tend to fluctuate with age: increasing from the 20s age group to middle age, but then decreasing gradually. This transition likely reflects the change in household asset holdings over the life cycle. We can interpret the numbers in the second figure as showing how much households’ wealth in each group is exposed to the implicit inflation tax through their Treasury holdings. Overall, the older, wealthiest households and the groups that are both middle-aged and middle wealth seem to be the most exposed.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Treasury holdings peak at 6% of net worth for the oldest and wealthiest households, in the fifth wealth quintile.
  2. For households in the second through fourth wealth quintiles, Treasuries as a share of net worth rise from the 20s age group to middle age and then decline gradually, a pattern likely reflecting life-cycle changes in asset holdings.
  3. Older, wealthiest households and middle-aged, middle-wealth households appear most exposed to the implicit inflation tax through their Treasury holdings.
  • Inflation
  • GDP

Artificial Intelligence Is A Familiar-Looking Monster, Say Henry Farrell and Cosma Shalizi

AI Summary. Markets and bureaucracies are enormous impersonal distributed systems of information-processing that make use of tacit knowledge no individual brain or government can comprehend, and large language models are another such system rather than something new. The authors argue individual freedom is preserved by setting these systems against one another.

Henry Farrell and Cosma Shalizi The Economist
Date Posted:
June 27, 2023
Is Database:
Database

.@henryfarrell and Cosma Shalizi argue that free markets and institutional hierarchies were revolutions in human information-processing, and AI can be seen along the same lines.

.@henryfarrell and Cosma Shalizi argue that free markets and institutional hierarchies were revolutions in human...

Are large language models just another impersonal information-processing system like markets?

Core argument: Henry Farrell and Cosma Shalizi argue that artificial intelligence is a familiar-looking monster whose lineage began at least two centuries ago with the industrial revolution, when vast inhuman forces transformed human society.

Artificial intelligence is a familiar-looking monster, say Henry Farrell and Cosma Shalizi [that] began at least two centuries ago with the industrial revolution, when human society was transformed by vast inhuman forces. Markets and bureaucracies seem familiar, but they are actually enormous, impersonal distributed systems of information-processing [with minds of their own]. Economist Friedrich Hayek argued, any complex economy has to somehow make use of a terrifyingly large body of disorganised and informal “tacit knowledge” … [that] no individual brain or government can possibly comprehend. These vast machineries are simply incapable of caring if they crush the powerless or devour the virtuous. The modern world has been built by and within monsters, which crush individuals without remorse or hesitation. We eke out freedom by setting one against another, deploying bureaucracy to limit market excesses, democracy to hold bureaucrats accountable, and markets and bureaucracies to limit democracy’s monstrous tendencies.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Henry Farrell and Cosma Shalizi argue that artificial intelligence is a familiar-looking monster whose lineage began at least two centuries ago with the industrial revolution, when vast inhuman forces transformed human society.
  2. Farrell and Shalizi describe markets and bureaucracies as enormous, impersonal distributed information-processing systems with minds of their own, incapable of caring if they crush the powerless or devour the virtuous.
  3. Friedrich Hayek argued that any complex economy must make use of a terrifyingly large body of disorganised, informal "tacit knowledge" that no individual brain or government can comprehend, according to Farrell and Shalizi.
  • Institutional Capabilities
  • Productivity

Not Just “Stimulus” Checks: The Marginal Propensity to Repay Debt

AI Summary. Households used about one third of stimulus transfers to pay down debt, a larger share than the average portion spent on consumption. Households with lower net liquid wealth relative to income are more likely to repay debt and adjust their net wealth positions, and spend a smaller share of transfers.

Gizem Koşar, Davide Melcangi, Laura Pilossoph et al. Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Date Posted:
June 27, 2023

.@gizemkosar @davide_melc and @DavidWiczer present evidence that lower wealth households used pandemic period transfers to pay down debt.

How much of stimulus transfers do households use to repay debt?

Core argument: Households used about one third of their stimulus transfers to pay down debt, a marginal propensity to repay debt higher than the average marginal propensity to consume that usually takes center stage.

We define marginal propensity to consume (MPC) as the share of the stimulus payment a household spent, marginal propensity to save (MPS) as the share a household saved, and marginal propensity to repay debt (MPRD) as the share used to pay down their debt. With these measures we document three main facts. First, households used one third of their transfers to pay down debt. This is higher than the average marginal propensity to consume (MPC), which usually takes center stage. Second, households with low net liquid wealth-to-income ratios are more likely to pay down debt and more likely to adjust their net wealth positions. Third, and relatedly, households with lower net liquid wealth-to-income ratios have lower MPCs. We show these two latter facts in the chart below. Note that we define net liquid wealth as the sum of liquid assets minus non-housing debt. For income, we use annual household income.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Households used about one third of their stimulus transfers to pay down debt, a marginal propensity to repay debt higher than the average marginal propensity to consume that usually takes center stage.
  2. Households with low net liquid wealth-to-income ratios are more likely to pay down debt and more likely to adjust their net wealth positions.
  3. Households with lower net liquid wealth-to-income ratios have lower marginal propensities to consume, with net liquid wealth defined as liquid assets minus non-housing debt and income measured as annual household income.
  • Government Spending
  • GDP
    • Business Cycle

Orders for US Business Equipment Increase for a Second Month

AI Summary. US orders for core capital goods — a proxy for business equipment investment that excludes aircraft and military hardware — rose 0.7% for a second consecutive monthly gain, following a 0.6% increase, according to Commerce Department figures not adjusted for inflation. The data indicate companies are continuing longer-term investments despite high borrowing costs and economic uncertainty.

Reade Pickert Bloomberg
Date Posted:
June 27, 2023

Core capital goods orders increased 0.7% in May as American firms continue to invest in manufacturing.

Are businesses still investing in equipment despite high borrowing costs?

Core argument: US core capital goods orders, which exclude aircraft and military hardware, rose 0.7% in May after a downwardly revised 0.6% gain in April, according to Commerce Department figures.

Orders placed with US factories for business equipment rose in May for a second month, indicating companies continue to make longer-term investments despite high borrowing costs and economic uncertainty. The value of core capital goods orders, a proxy for investment in equipment that excludes aircraft and military hardware, increased 0.7% last month after a downwardly revised 0.6% gain in April, Commerce Department figures showed Tuesday. The data aren’t adjusted for inflation.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. US core capital goods orders, which exclude aircraft and military hardware, rose 0.7% in May after a downwardly revised 0.6% gain in April, according to Commerce Department figures.
  2. Orders placed with US factories for business equipment increased for a second consecutive month, indicating companies continue to make longer-term investments despite high borrowing costs and economic uncertainty.
  3. The Commerce Department's core capital goods orders figures measure the value of orders and are not adjusted for inflation.

Related Articles:

  • An American Investment Boom Would Be Good for the World — A substantial rise in U.S. investment would likely require greater output from existing labor and capital plus higher imports, since there is little appetite to cut current consumption and little scope to export less. Foreign producers stand to benefit even where investment subsidies carry local-content restrictions.
  • America Is Back in the Factory Business — U.S. construction spending on manufacturing facilities reached $108bn in a single year, a record annual total and more than was spent building schools, healthcare centers or office buildings. Much of the growth is in electric-vehicle batteries and semiconductors, national priorities backed by billions of dollars in government incentives.
  • Investment

America’s Biggest Power Source Wasn’t Built for Extreme Weather

AI Summary. Natural gas surpassed coal as the largest US electricity source and accounts for a record 41% of power production, more than solar, wind, hydro and coal combined. Gas plants, pipelines and their regulations were largely built without extreme weather in mind, with uneven winterization and some plants dependent on a single pipeline; gas accounted for about 47% of outages.

Naureen Malik Bloomberg
Date Posted:
June 27, 2023

Natural gas now makes up 41% of American power generation, more than solar, wind, hydro and coal combined, but accounts for 47% of outages. @markets

Is the largest US electricity source vulnerable to extreme weather?

Core argument: Natural gas will make up a record 41% of US power production this year, more than solar, wind, hydro and coal combined, after overtaking coal as the top electricity source in 2016.

Given its reputation for low-cost, clean and stable generation, gas dethroned coal in 2016 as the US’s No. 1 source of electricity. This year, it will make up a record 41% of power production, more than solar, wind, hydro and coal combined. Although natural gas is often promoted as a “bridge fuel” to span the transition from coal power to renewable energy, the country’s vast network of gas plants, pipelines and the regulations that govern them were largely built without the realities of extreme weather in mind. Facilities aren’t uniformly winterized, and some rely on a single gas pipeline for supply. Between plant malfunctions and fuel shortages, natural gas accounted for about 47% of outages.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Natural gas will make up a record 41% of US power production this year, more than solar, wind, hydro and coal combined, after overtaking coal as the top electricity source in 2016.
  2. Natural gas accounted for about 47% of power outages, stemming from plant malfunctions and fuel shortages.
  3. The US network of gas plants, pipelines and governing regulations was largely built without extreme weather in mind, with facilities not uniformly winterized and some relying on a single gas pipeline for supply.
  • Energy

Can China Fix Youth Unemployment Woes With Military Recruitment Drive?

AI Summary. More than 90% of China's military recruitment this year could come from recent graduates and high school students, which analysts say serves both the People's Liberation Army's modernisation targets and the country's record youth unemployment. Military academies remain less attractive to top students than leading public universities.

Minnie Chan South China Morning Post
Date Posted:
June 27, 2023

The Chinese military is drawing more heavily on recent high school and college graduates, in an effort to raise military capability and offset persistent youth unemployment. Recruiters are particularly targeting science and engineering talent. @SCMPNews

The Chinese military is drawing more heavily on recent high school and college graduates, in an effort to raise military...

Can military recruitment ease record youth unemployment and modernize China's forces?

Core argument: More than 90% of China's military recruitment this year could be drawn from fresh graduates and high school students, aimed at meeting the People's Liberation Army's modernisation targets while easing record youth unemployment.

More than 90% of this year’s recruitment to the Chinese military could be drawn from fresh graduates and high school students, in a bid to meet the People’s Liberation Army’s modernisation targets and ease the country’s record youth unemployment. Analysts said that a drive to encourage educated young people to join the PLA was likely to have a twin purpose, with Beijing determined to achieve a world-class military by 2050 and more than 11 million graduates expected to swell the job market this year. The army is still finding it difficult to attract the country’s most outstanding young people, according to Zhou Chenming, a researcher with the Beijing-based Yuan Wang military science and technology think tank “Compared with top public universities like Peking and Tsinghua, military academies are less attractive to outstanding high school students in first-tier cities like Beijing and Shanghai.”

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. More than 90% of China's military recruitment this year could be drawn from fresh graduates and high school students, aimed at meeting the People's Liberation Army's modernisation targets while easing record youth unemployment.
  2. Analysts said the push to recruit educated young people likely serves a twin purpose, with Beijing targeting a world-class military by 2050 and more than 11 million graduates expected to enter the job market this year.

Related Articles:

  • China Youth Jobless Rate Hits Record 20.8% in Challenge for Policymakers — China's unemployment rate among 16- to 24-year-olds reached a record 20.8%, up from 20.4% the prior month, according to the National Bureau of Statistics. That is 4x the overall surveyed jobless rate of 5.2%.
  • Why Has Youth Unemployment Risen So Much in China? — Young workers aged 15-24 are particularly vulnerable when economic growth slows, and China's youth unemployment rate does not appear to be an outlier relative to its income level among global peers. Mismatches between the skills graduates acquire in higher education and those employers demand may add to labor market frictions.
  • China
  • Workforce
    • Unemployment/Participation


Loading More Posts

End of content

No more pages to load

© Copyright 2026 Coherent Research Institute · All Rights Reserved · Privacy · Terms