Edward Conard

Top Ten New York Times Bestselling Author

  • “…reminds us that inequality sends a signal of what society lacks most, in America’s case, entrepreneurship and risk taking.” - Lawrence Lindsey, CEO, The Lindsey Group, former Director of the National Economic Council
  • “…a must-read for serious students of economic policy.” - Glenn Hubbard, Dean, Columbia Business School, and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
  • “…serious thinking for serious thinkers. …a thought-provoking blueprint for growing middle- and working-class incomes.” - Mitt Romney, former Governor of Massachusetts
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “…a very valuable contribution.” - Larry Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury and director of the National Economic Council, president emeritus, Harvard University
  • “…reminds us that inequality sends a signal of what society lacks most, in America’s case, entrepreneurship and risk taking.” - Lawrence Lindsey, CEO, The Lindsey Group, former Director of the National Economic Council
  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • “Unintended Consequences is far smarter and more thought-provoking than most economics written for the general public” - Greg Mankiw, Harvard University, Former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors
  • “…serious thinking for serious thinkers. …a thought-provoking blueprint for growing middle- and working-class incomes.” - Mitt Romney, former Governor of Massachusetts
  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • “…a very valuable contribution.” - Larry Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury and director of the National Economic Council, president emeritus, Harvard University
  • “…a comprehensive explanation of the modern economy.” - Julian Robertson, Founder, Tiger Management
Upside of Inequality Oxford Unintended Consequences
Buy the Books
  • Macro Roundup
  • About Roundup
  • About Ed Conard
  • Highlights
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
Edward Conard
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • youtube

Macro Roundup

  • Email
  • Text Message (SMS)
  • Twitter/X
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp Message
Subscribe to Macro Roundup Emails
Select topics to choose: articles that mention them (broader) or articles mainly about them (focused)
  • Mentions 0
  • Primary focus 0
Showing all 7,315 Macro Roundup articles
When you search for any topic (like GDP, Inflation, or Banking), choose:
Choose search scope

Thursday, January 19, 2023

Job Market’s 2.6 Million Missing People Unnerves Star Harvard Economist

AI Summary. Researchers estimate that US employment among the poorest quarter of the workforce remained 13.5% below pre-pandemic levels after adjusting for wage growth, a shortfall of roughly 2.6m people. Low-wage workers are scarcest in the local areas where high-income households cut spending most sharply.

Ben Steverman Bloomberg
Date Posted:
January 19, 2023
Is Database:
Database

Raj Chetty and his @OppInsights team find that America’s workforce earning <$29k/year is down about 20% relative to its January 2020 level. Adjusting for workers now earning over $29k, the low-wage workforce was 13.5% under its pre-pandemic level. @BSteverman

Does high-income spending explain the missing low-wage workers?

Core argument: Employment for the poorest quarter of the US workforce remained 13.5% below pre-pandemic levels at the end of 2021 after adjusting for wage growth, researchers found, with about 2.6 million people missing from the job market.

The US is missing about a fifth of its pre-pandemic low-income workforce. At least some of those workers moved to higher-paying jobs, but, after adjusting for wage growth, researchers found employment for the poorest quarter of the workforce was still 13.5% below pre-pandemic levels at the end of 2021. Analyzing local trends, researchers found an important clue to where those missing workers went: Low-wage workers are scarcest where 2020’s devastation was worst. “It is clear there are large swaths of the population who are still not employed, and these are low-wage workers who lost their jobs in precisely the places where high-income people cut back on spending so sharply a couple of years ago,” Chetty said.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Employment for the poorest quarter of the US workforce remained 13.5% below pre-pandemic levels at the end of 2021 after adjusting for wage growth, researchers found, with about 2.6 million people missing from the job market.
  2. The US is missing roughly a fifth of its pre-pandemic low-income workforce, and at least some of those workers moved into higher-paying jobs.
  3. Researchers analyzing local trends found low-wage workers are scarcest where 2020's devastation was worst, and Chetty said these workers lost their jobs in precisely the places where high-income people sharply cut spending.
  • Unemployment/Participation
  • GDP
    • Business Cycle
  • Workforce

United States' Disinflation Continues Money: Inside and Out

AI Summary. Underlying durable goods prices are deflating while underlying services inflation remains around 5% over three months, and adjusted core services inflation has decelerated from an annualized 7.2% over three months to 4.7%. The risk is that core services inflation settles near 4-5% annualized rather than returning to the pre-pandemic 2% pace.

Chris Marsh Money: Inside and Out
Date Posted:
January 19, 2023

.@GeneralTheorist notes that, while durable goods are deflating, service inflation has decelerated from 7.2% in the three months ending October to 4.7% in December, but remains well above the 2% pre-pandemic run-rate.

Will services inflation settle near 4-5% instead of returning to 2%?

Core argument: U.S. adjusted core service inflation decelerated from 7.2% annualized over the three months to October to 4.7% in December, an improvement the author calls clear.

While underlying durables are now deflating, underlying services remain high—at about 5% over 3 months, accelerating to 7% month-over-month annualized in Dec. On the bright side, adjusted core service inflation has decelerated from 7.2% over 3 months (annualized) to Oct. to only 4.7% in Dec. This is clearly an improvement. But is that only because Oct. and Nov. prints were unusually soft, or was Dec. the outlier in an otherwise strong disinflation trend? The fear for the Fed then is super core services settling around 4-5% annualized instead of returning to the 2% run-rate that characterized the pre-pandemic norm. What will it be? It may take until March until we can be sure.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. U.S. adjusted core service inflation decelerated from 7.2% annualized over the three months to October to 4.7% in December, an improvement the author calls clear.
  2. Underlying U.S. services inflation remains near 5% over three months and accelerated to 7% month-over-month annualized in December, even as underlying durables prices deflate.
  3. The risk for the Federal Reserve is super core services inflation settling at 4–5% annualized rather than returning to the pre-pandemic 2% run-rate, with clarity unlikely before March.
  • Inflation
  • GDP
  • Monetary Policy

Young, Less Educated Faced Higher Inflation in 2021—But Gaps Now Closed

AI Summary. During the inflation surge, younger people and people without a college degree faced higher inflation than the overall average, reflecting their larger spending shares on transportation, particularly used cars and motor fuel. Those gaps later narrowed and reversed as transportation inflation fell back toward overall inflation while housing inflation, which weighs more on college-educated households, rose faster.

Rajashri Chakrabarti, Dan Garcia, and Maxim Pinkovskiy Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Date Posted:
January 19, 2023

During 2021 and 2022, inflation disproportionately impacted young people and those without a college degree (largely driven by used car and fuel expenses), though inflation for those groups has now converged with older and college workers. @NYFedResearch

Did inflation hit younger, less educated households harder, then reverse?

Core argument: Inflation gaps by age and education widened steadily from early 2021 through June 2022, with younger people and people without a college degree facing the highest inflation, then narrowed rapidly and partly reversed by December 2022.

During the inflationary period of 2021-22, younger people and people without a college degree faced the highest inflation, with steadily widening gaps relative to the overall average between early 2021 and June 2022, followed by a rapid narrowing of the gaps and a reversal of some of them by December 2022. This pattern arises primarily from a greater share of the expenditures of younger people and people without a college degree being devoted to transportation—particularly used cars and motor fuel—which led the 2021 inflationary episode but has since converged to general inflation. As of December 2022, the disparity has reversed, with no-college households experiencing lower inflation over the last twelve months than college households did. The reversal of the earlier rise in inflation disparities can be explained by 1) transportation inflation, which affects no-college households relatively more, declining back to the headline CPI, and 2) housing inflation, which affects college households relatively more, rising faster than headline CPI.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Inflation gaps by age and education widened steadily from early 2021 through June 2022, with younger people and people without a college degree facing the highest inflation, then narrowed rapidly and partly reversed by December 2022.
  2. The disparity arose primarily because younger and no-college households devote a greater share of expenditures to transportation—particularly used cars and motor fuel—which led the 2021 inflationary episode before converging to general inflation.
  3. As of December 2022, no-college households experienced lower twelve-month inflation than college households, as transportation inflation declined back to the headline CPI while housing inflation, which weighs more on college households, rose faster than headline CPI.
  • Inflation
  • GDP
  • Monetary Policy

The Eurozone's Unique Inflation Crisis

AI Summary. United States inflation is largely driven by cyclical, demand-sensitive components such as housing and labor-intensive services, while Eurozone inflation is driven mainly by food, energy, and manufactured goods more indicative of supply shocks. Euro area wage growth has stayed below 4%, in line with pre-pandemic levels, as American wage growth set new records.

Joseph Politano Apricitas Economics
Date Posted:
January 19, 2023

.@JosephPolitano notes differences in wage growth in the US and EU, and argues that Eurozone inflation is largely being driven by shocks related to the Russo-Ukrainian War, while inflation in the US is broader.

Is Eurozone inflation driven by supply shocks rather than demand?

Core argument: Euro area wage growth has remained below 4% on negotiated wage and labor cost index measures, in line with pre-COVID levels, while American wage growth set new records.

American inflation is now largely driven by cyclical or demand-sensitive components like housing and labor-intensive services. Eurozone inflation is still driven mainly by rapid price increases in components like food, energy, and manufactured goods that are more representative of supply shocks than excess demand. Fundamentally, the biggest difference between Europe's and America’s inflation situation comes from wage growth. Measured through negotiated wage growth or the labor cost index, Euro area wage growth has remained tempered, below 4%, and in line with pre-COVID levels as American wage growth set new records. Growth in listed wages on job postings in the Euro Area was 5.1% over the last year and less than 2% the year before. The comparable number in the US has grown by over 6%/yr for the past two years.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Euro area wage growth has remained below 4% on negotiated wage and labor cost index measures, in line with pre-COVID levels, while American wage growth set new records.
  2. Listed wages in Euro Area job postings rose 5.1% over the past year after growing less than 2% the year before, versus over 6% a year in the US across the past two years.
  3. US inflation is largely driven by cyclical, demand-sensitive components such as housing and labor-intensive services, while Eurozone inflation stems mainly from food, energy, and manufactured goods more representative of supply shocks than excess demand.
  • Inflation
  • GDP
  • Monetary Policy

More Young Americans Are Dying, But Not from Vaccines

AI Summary. The mortality rate for Americans aged 15 to 34 reached its highest level since 1973, driven mostly by external causes such as accidents including drug overdoses, suicides and homicides. Covid causes heart inflammation at higher rates than vaccines do, and heart-disease deaths among 15-to-34-year-olds did not increase after vaccines became available.

Justin Fox Bloomberg
Date Posted:
January 19, 2023

The mortality rate for Americans aged 15-34 in 2021 was the highest since 1973. Deaths due to accidents (including drug overdoses,) suicides, and homicides were up 32% percent from 2019. @foxjust

Why are death rates among young Americans at multi-decade highs?

Core argument: The 2021 U.S. mortality rate for ages 15–34 was the highest since 1973, and for ages 25–34 the highest since 1950, mostly from external causes such as accidents including drug overdoses, suicides and homicides.

The 2021 mortality rate for those 15 to 34 was the highest since 1973, and for those 25 to 34, it was the highest since 1950. That something, it should be clear from the chart, is mostly external causes such as accidents (including accidental drug overdoses), suicides and homicides. Covid itself has been found to cause myocarditis, pericarditis and other heart troubles at a higher rate than the vaccines do, and given that the initial increase in heart-disease deaths coincided with the arrival of Covid, the simplest explanation is that Covid is chiefly to blame. There certainly was no big increase in heart-disease deaths after the vaccines arrived: in the 12 months starting in July 2021, there were 106 fewer heart-disease deaths among 15-to-34-year-olds than in the previous 12.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. The 2021 U.S. mortality rate for ages 15–34 was the highest since 1973, and for ages 25–34 the highest since 1950, mostly from external causes such as accidents including drug overdoses, suicides and homicides.
  2. In the 12 months starting July 2021, heart-disease deaths among 15-to-34-year-olds were 106 fewer than in the prior 12 months, indicating no large increase after Covid vaccines arrived.
  3. Covid has been found to cause myocarditis, pericarditis and other heart troubles at a higher rate than the vaccines do, and the initial rise in heart-disease deaths coincided with Covid's arrival, making Covid the simplest explanation.
  • Healthcare/Seniors

Fighting Global Protection: Why the Economist is Mistaken

AI Summary. The author argues that large, persistent trade surpluses exist only because businesses in some countries can underpay domestic workers and households to gain international competitiveness, making it absurd to label the United States—which typically absorbs 40–50% of global trade surpluses—protectionist. If such policies partly reversed these imbalances, they would improve the efficiency of global trade.

Michael Pettis China Financial Markets
Date Posted:
January 19, 2023

.@michaelxpettis notes that policies to reduce the American trade deficit would in fact “improve the efficiency of global trade by reducing the imbalances” driven by Chinese and other chronic surplus countries’ beggar-thy-neighbor policies.

.@michaelxpettis notes that policies to reduce the American trade deficit would in fact “improve the efficiency of...

Are trade surpluses caused by underpaying domestic workers and households?

Core argument: The United States typically absorbs 40–50 percent of global trade surpluses, which the author argues makes it absurd to criticize the country as "protectionist.".

Large, persistent trade surpluses exist only because businesses in certain countries are able directly and indirectly to underpay domestic workers and households in order to become more competitive internationally and to grow more rapidly. It is especially absurd to criticize the United States, the country that typically absorbs 40–50 percent of global trade surpluses, as “protectionist.” If countries like the United States were to implement policies deemed “protectionist” and these were able even partly to reverse the trade imbalances (a big “if”), they would actually improve the efficiency of global trade by reducing the imbalances.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. The United States typically absorbs 40–50 percent of global trade surpluses, which the author argues makes it absurd to criticize the country as "protectionist.".
  2. Large, persistent trade surpluses exist only because businesses in surplus countries directly and indirectly underpay domestic workers and households to gain international competitiveness and grow faster, according to the author.
  3. The author contends that if countries like the United States adopted policies labeled "protectionist" and these even partly reversed trade imbalances, global trade efficiency would improve through smaller imbalances.
  • Savings Glut/Trade Deficit
  • GDP

Job Markets 2.6 Million Missing People Unnerves Star Harvard Economist

AI Summary. The number of US workers earning under $29k a year has fallen 20% since before the pandemic, a 13.5% drop even after accounting for those who moved into higher-paying jobs. With the labor force participation rate still below pre-pandemic levels, roughly 2.6m potential workers are unaccounted for despite a 3.5% unemployment rate.

Ben Steverman Bloomberg
Date Posted:
January 19, 2023
Is Database:
Database

Americans’ workforce earning <$29,000 a year is down 20% relative to January 2020 level; adjusted for workers earning more than $29K, workforce is down 13.5%.

Why are millions of low-wage workers missing from the labor force?

Core argument: The US workforce earning under $29,000 a year has shrunk 20% since January 2020, and 13.5% even after accounting for workers who moved into higher-paying jobs.

The US workforce earning <$29k/year has decreased by 20% since January 2020, with a 13.5% drop even after accounting for those who moved to higher-paying jobs. This decline highlights a significant gap in low-wage employment, particularly in areas hardest hit by the pandemic, such as affluent neighborhoods where spending sharply decreased. Despite a low unemployment rate of 3.5%, the labor force participation rate remains below pre-pandemic levels, leaving 2.6m potential workers unaccounted for. Factors like high real estate costs, lack of affordable childcare, and inflation exacerbate the issue, pushing workers to seek more flexible or rewarding opportunities elsewhere. The absence of a comprehensive labor supply policy further complicates recovery efforts, necessitating innovative local solutions to address these workforce shortages and prevent long-term economic damage.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. The US workforce earning under $29,000 a year has shrunk 20% since January 2020, and 13.5% even after accounting for workers who moved into higher-paying jobs.
  2. Despite a 3.5% unemployment rate, the US labor force participation rate remains below pre-pandemic levels, leaving 2.6 million potential workers unaccounted for.
  3. High real estate costs, scarce affordable childcare, and inflation push low-wage workers toward more flexible or rewarding opportunities, with no comprehensive labor supply policy in place to address the shortfall.

Chetty’s team finds that America's workforce earning <$29k/year is down about 20% relative to its January 2020 level. Adjusting for workers now earning over $29k, the low-wage workforce was 13.5% under its pre-pandemic level. “…The US is missing about a fifth of its pre-pandemic low-income workforce. At least some of those workers moved to higher-paying jobs, but, after adjusting for wage growth, researchers found employment for the poorest quarter of the workforce was still 13.5% below pre-pandemic levels at the end of 2021.Analyzing local trends, researchers found an important clue to where those missing workers went: Low-wage workers are scarcest where 2020’s devastation was worst. “It is clear there are large swaths of the population who are still not employed, and these are low-wage workers who lost their jobs in precisely the places where high-income people cut back on spending so sharply a couple of years ago” Chetty said…”

Ben Steverman, "Job Market’s 2.6 Million Missing People Unnerves Star Harvard Economist,"Bloomberg, January 18, 2023, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-18/job-market-update-2-6-million-missing-people-in-us-labor-force-shakes-economist

Job Market’s 2.6 Million Missing People Unnerves Star Harvard Economist

Behind the five-decade low US unemployment rate of 3.5% lies a 2.6 million-person mystery.

That’s roughly how many more Americans should be working or looking for jobs if the economy’s labor force participation rate was the same as before the Covid-19 pandemic. But something’s still off, leaving everyone from mom-and-pop businesses to Federal Reserve economists scrambling to answer a crucial question: Where are these workers?

Economist Raj Chetty and his big-data experts at Harvard University’s Opportunity Insights lab went looking for these missing people. Their research relies on an innovative method of tracking the economy, built in the early months of the pandemic, that blends anonymized transaction data from private companies.

The data highlight to Chetty and his team just how much those awful months in 2020 still haunt the US economy. Even as their tracker shows metrics like job listings, consumer spending and small business revenue surging back above January 2020 levels, the US is missing about a fifth of its pre-pandemic low-income workforce. At least some of those workers moved to higher-paying jobs, but, after adjusting for wage growth, researchers found employment for the poorest quarter of the workforce was still 13.5% below pre-pandemic levels at the end of 2021.

Job Markets 2.6 Million Missing People Unnerves Star Harvard Economist: Extended Excerpt Image 1


Analyzing local trends, researchers found an important clue to where those missing workers went: Low-wage workers are scarcest where 2020’s devastation was worst.

As it turns out, the hardest-hit businesses were in the richest neighborhoods. In areas like Boston’s Back Bay, New York’s Upper West Side and Brentwood in Los Angeles, the pandemic and its aftermath have thrown into chaos the lives of millions of employees who once waited on the wealthy in restaurants, bars, gyms and hair salons.

“It is clear there are large swaths of the population who are still not employed, and these are low-wage workers who lost their jobs in precisely the places where high-income people cut back on spending so sharply a couple years ago,” Chetty said.

The pandemic sent shockwaves throughout the US labor market and created a divide between the professional class — where many roles could be done remotely — and those in lower-income jobs like retail and hospitality, which require in-person interaction. That makes certain areas, like those with dense office space and businesses that cater to workers who may never fully return, a sharp focus for researchers seeking to understand the lasting economic consequences of the Covid era.

Missing Recovery

While almost every other gauge of the economy had fully recovered by the end of 2021, Chetty’s tracker shows low-wage employment levels have been stagnant for more than a year.

Job Markets 2.6 Million Missing People Unnerves Star Harvard Economist: Extended Excerpt Image 2


Economists have puzzled over why, finding partial explanations in everything from opioids and immigration restrictions to an aging population and fear of Covid. Chetty and his team argue against a few of these theories, preferring to look at the local level instead.

When low-wage employment is plotted on a graph by county, the highest-rent areas are missing the most workers — the places where bars, restaurants and health clubs were most empty in 2020. Chetty, along with professors John Friedman of Brown University, Nathaniel Hendren of Harvard and Michael Stepner of the University of Toronto, write the “strongest predictor” of the drop in employment is “the size of the initial shock.”

Even before Covid, low-income workers were getting older — the US population’s median age has steadily risen since the 1970s — and struggling with employment barriers like a lack of affordable child care and housing. Then the pandemic made almost everything worse, including strains on families, effects on health, the hassles of commuting and the stress of the jobs themselves.

Of course, Covid-induced strains or job losses didn’t set off a downward spiral for every low-income worker. Many managed to reinvent themselves, switching industries, negotiating raises or moving to areas with better opportunities. And wage growth broadly has been higher for those in the lower income brackets.

Pressure Building

Still, even many of those who managed to replace their lost jobs have never been the same.

Rafael, an undocumented immigrant from Nicaragua who asked not to use his last name, was working in a kitchen whipping up Mediterranean food in 2020 when the orders stopped coming in. The Maryland restaurant shut permanently.

While Rafael liked the conditions at his last restaurant, he decided that, at age 57, he can’t risk returning to the kitchen.

In restaurants, “there’s a lot of pressure and they really expect a lot of energy and labor,” he said. “But with my age, I’m losing energy bit by bit every day.”

Since then, he has been earning money cleaning houses and caring for an elderly man. But the odd and unpredictable gigs aren’t enough, especially with rent and almost everything else getting more expensive. “Unfortunately, I just don’t have the necessary hours I need,” he said, speaking in Spanish through an interpreter.

Those trying to make it work in megacities say their former employees are following the higher-paid, work-from-home cohort to areas of the country that are more affordable.

‘Easier, Rewarding’

“People who had a year and a half to figure out what to do with their lives figured out they wanted easier jobs, or jobs that were more rewarding,” said Philippe Massoud, who has struggled with staff shortages at his Lebanese restaurants, named Ilili, in New York and Washington. “They moved to places they didn’t have to commute one hour each way to get to work,” like North Carolina, he said.

A shortage of affordable housing near good jobs is a national problem. Real estate costs in Portland, Maine, jumped when city-dwelling professionals descended on the charming New England city to buy second homes during Covid.

For lower-paid employees, “it’s getting tougher and tougher to live closer to downtown as time goes on,” said Andrew Volk, co-owner of cocktail bar Portland Hunt and Alpine Club.

Paying workers more is a partial solution — one that Volk and Massoud have tried, even though it required raising prices.

“It’s just a question of making sure your wages are attractive and you offer a good benefit package,” said Aaron Seyedian, owner of a cleaning service, called Well-Paid Maids, that prides itself on paying $22 per hour in Washington and $27 in New York.

He finds himself soaking up employees from other industries, including former managers at retail stores or restaurants who are relatively well-paid but fed up with those jobs.

Inflation Impact

But the extra money only goes so far when inflation has hit many lower-income families the hardest. And even a substantial raise won’t solve situations where life is making it impossible to get back to work.

Kayla Cooper, a 34-year-old mother of three young children, lost her job in 2020, then worked for two years as a contact tracer from home. But the trained social worker now can’t find anything that provides the same flexibility or sufficient pay and benefits to compensate for crushing child care bills.

“If I’ll be making $24 an hour but daycare is $25 an hour, why am I going back to work?” she said. “I feel pushed out of the workforce.”

Job Markets 2.6 Million Missing People Unnerves Star Harvard Economist: Extended Excerpt Image 3


The US once led the world in the proportion of women who worked, but nearly every developed nation now surpasses the US in their labor force participation rate for women. The share of both men and women in the American workforce has been dropping since the turn of the century.

One difference is “the US has never had a comprehensive labor supply policy” to bring more workers onto the job, said labor economist Kathryn Edwards. Child care subsidies, paid sick and family leave, and the right to part-time work would lower the job barriers for parents and other caregivers, older workers and people with disabilities.

Divided control of Washington makes any major changes unlikely for the next couple years. In the meantime, local governments and businesses may need to get creative in strategies for bringing workers back, particularly to the places where they’re most scarce.

Despite unemployment and other economic measures looking pretty good, “policymakers need to not be lulled into a sense of complacency,” said Friedman, the study’s co-author and a co-director of Opportunity Insights. Long-term unemployment can cause “a lot of damage to careers and the economy long term.”

  • Government Spending
  • Fiscal Policy
  • GDP
    • Business Cycle
  • Workforce
    • Poverty/Crime
    • Unemployment/Participation
    • Wages/Income

Friday, January 20, 2023

Where'd All the Workers Go?

AI Summary. Group life insurance payments rose 20.7% above the five-year average and 15% above 2020 levels, and excluding Covid-19 and unnatural deaths such as homicide, suicide, and overdose reveals a spike in natural non-Covid deaths among working-age people. While the vulnerable died of Covid at high rates earlier, younger and healthy people subsequently died in aberrantly high numbers of something else.

Bret Swanson Infonomena
Date Posted:
January 20, 2023
Is Database:
Database

.@JBSay notes there have been at least 400,000 unexpected deaths among the US working-age population since 2020. Netting out Covid deaths and unnatural deaths (homicide, suicide, overdose, etc.) he finds a spike starting in 2021.

Are working-age deaths rising from causes other than Covid?

Core argument: Group life insurance payments rose 20.7% above the five-year average in 2021 and 15% above 2020, the acute pandemic year.

In 2021 group life [insurance] payments exploded by 20.7% over the five-year average and by 15% over the acute pandemic year of 2020. If we remove both Covid-19 and unnatural deaths (homicide, suicide, overdose, etc.), we see a dramatic spike of natural, non-Covid-19 deaths among working-age people beginning in the spring and summer of 2021. To overgeneralize: In 2020, the vulnerable died of Covid at unusually high rates. In 2021 and 2022, Covid continued its assault, but the young, middle-aged, and healthy also died in aberrantly high numbers of something else.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Group life insurance payments rose 20.7% above the five-year average in 2021 and 15% above 2020, the acute pandemic year.
  2. Excluding Covid-19 and unnatural deaths such as homicide, suicide, and overdose, natural non-Covid deaths among working-age people spiked beginning in the spring and summer of 2021.
  3. The author characterizes the shift as the vulnerable dying of Covid at unusually high rates in 2020, while in 2021 and 2022 young, middle-aged, and healthy people also died in aberrantly high numbers of something else.

Breat Swanson notes there have been at least 400,000 unexpected deaths among the US working-age population since 2020. Netting out Covid deaths and unnatural deaths (homicide, suicide, overdose, etc.) he finds a spike starting in 2021.

“…In 2021 group life [insurance] payments exploded by 20.7% over the five-year average and by 15% over the acute pandemic year of 2020. If we remove both Covid-19 and unnatural deaths (homicide, suicide, overdose, etc.), we see a dramatic spike of natural, non-Covid-19 deaths among working-age people beginning in the spring and summer of 2021. To overgeneralize: In 2020, the vulnerable died of Covid at unusually high rates. In 2021 and 2022, Covid continued its assault, but the young, middle-aged, and healthy also died in aberrantly high numbers of something else….”

Bret Swanson, “Where Did All the Workers Go?,” Infonomena, January 19, 2023, https://infonomena.substack.com/p/whered-all-the-workers-go

Where Did All the Workers Go?

In a November 30, 2022, speech on “Inflation and the Labor Market,” Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell blamed most of the 3.5 million estimated shortfall in the U.S. labor force on premature retirements. He also blamed a large portion – between 280,000 and 680,000 – on “long Covid.” In a footnote, however, Powell acknowledged a far more somber factor: an estimated 400,000 unexpected deaths among working age people.

It’s easy to blame these deaths on Covid-19. The virus is of course one significant cause. But it’s not nearly the only cause, especially among young and middle-age workers. We need better government data transparency to make a full assessment. Until then, we can proceed with others who track mortality for a living – life insurance companies.

The Great Divide – 2020 vs. 2021

In 2020, Covid-19 took many lives, even among select groups of middle-age people, specifically those with comorbidities such as diabetes. In 2020, Covid did not take very many lives of healthy young and middle-age people – for example, the types of people who are employed at large and mid-size companies and who have group life insurance. As you can see in the chart below, group life insurance benefit payments in 2020 were barely higher than in 2018.

In 2021, however, group life payments exploded by 20.7% over the five year average and by 15% over the acute pandemic year of 2020. Why would healthy young and middle-age people suddenly begin dying in large numbers in 2021 when they’d navigated 2020 with relative success?

Especially when we consider that in 2021, the U.S. administered 520 million Covid-19 vaccine doses. Shouldn’t healthy people employed in good jobs with good benefits, now protected with vaccines, have fared better in 2021 than in 2020? Surely, overdoses and suicides have risen in recent years. But those causes of death are less prominent among the group life cohorts in general, and the latest data confirm these were not drivers of the group life surge. Curiously, two of the largest spikes in 2021 came from deadly automobile accidents and non-automobile accidents.

Millennial Mortality

Let’s look at a few of these young adult age groups in more detail. In the charts below, we’ve broken out total all-cause deaths into three groups – 30-34, 35-39, and 40-44. Eyeballing the age group charts alone shows that factors other than Covid-19 itself must have driven large portions of the mortality spike in young and middle-age workers. (We are using official statistics, which likely overstate Covid mortality and understate non-Covid mortality. It’s the best we’ve got for now.)

The most important overall point is that 2021 was far worse for young and middle-age people than 2020.

Another key point is that 2022 was also worse than 2020, though not as bad as 2021.

Mortality rates in 2022 were still dramatically higher than the pre-pandemic baseline.

Covid-19 hit hard in 2020, especially for the old, vulnerable, and comorbid. In other words, Covid-19 took many of the most unhealthy from us in 2020. In principle, therefore, a smaller number unhealthy people might have been susceptible to Covid-19 in 2021 and 2022. High mortality years are often followed by low mortality years. After two successive high mortality years, the third year is even more likely to be low-mortality. For 2022 to be as bad, or somewhat worse, than 2020, is thus a big surprise. Last year’s milder Omicron variants make 2022’s stubbornly high mortality rate even more baffling.

All-cause mortality is crucial to understand whether public health policies are working. All-cause numbers can also help expose faulty reasoning when overly narrow, overly complicated, or overly clever analyses miss or hide important signals. For example, an analysis which purported to show lockdowns reduced Covid deaths but which neglected to show other deaths rose even more, would not reflect the totality of the policy’s effects. Likewise, a chemotherapy which shrinks tumors but kills patients may be successful in its narrow task yet fail the larger mission. Most analysts and health authorities studiously ignored all-cause over the last three years. The all-cause figures above show our Covid policies were far from successful.

For other purposes, however, it’s helpful and even necessary to drill down on specific causes. Important signals can also be lost in large groupings – Simpson’s paradox, for example, is a common statistical illusion. (Few have dug deeper, with as much specificity, as John Beaudoin, an engineer from Massachusetts who gained access to his state’s digital death records for the last eight years. He shows that specific causes of death spike and fall at important moments and periods. CDC data is not organized with such granularity. More on Beaudoin’s analysis in coming weeks…)

We know that recent years saw an upswing in drug overdoses and suicides, which accelerated with the pandemic lockdowns. Although these troubling trends cannot explain the enormous and unprecedented all-cause mortality seen above, we should attempt to account for them. Likewise, although Covid-19 did not cause all these record deaths, it was a significant factor.

Employment Aberration

So we dig deeper. If we remove both Covid-19 and unnatural deaths (homicide, suicide, overdose, etc.), we see a dramatic spike of natural, non-Covid-19 deaths among working age people beginning in the spring and summer of 2021. The CDC then stopped publishing the detailed data breaking out these particular categories.

But we know this trend continued. In fact, it got much worse. The life insurance companies told us so. On a December 30, 2021, videoconference with the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, OneAmerica CEO Scott Davison reported with shock:

“And what we saw just in third quarter, we’re seeing it continue into fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic.”

“40% is just unheard of.”

“It may not all be COVID on their death certificate, but deaths are up just huge, huge numbers.”

Several months later, Lincoln National reported its 2021 payouts were $1.4 billion, versus $548 million in 2020, a 164% rise.

As you will remember seeing in our three all-cause charts, August, September, and October of 2021 showed a gigantic upward bubble – the worst ever period of concentrated young and middle-age deaths, at least in modern times.

Heart attacks, strokes, pulmonary embolisms, accidents, and many seemingly-inexplicable sudden deaths, which continued into 2022, and now in 2023. Here is the Society of Actuaries November 2022 update, which goes through June 2022.

It’s true that the late summer and fall period of 2021 coincided with the Delta wave in the U.S., which was more infectious and appeared to be more pathogenic than previous variants. (We’ve suggested the mass vaccination programs may have, by exerting extreme evolutionary pressure, driven convergence onto more infectious, vaccine-evading variants. Brand new research just published in the New England Journal of Medicine continues to bolster our escape variant thesis: Substantial Neutralization Escape by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variants BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.)

Federal officials and the medical establishment, you will recall, argued in 2021 that it was a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” Even the Society of Actuaries attempts to explain away its alarming findings by implying the deaths are due to lack of vaccination. It does so with crude regressions of excess mortality and bulk state-wide vaccination totals as of June 30, 2021.

But remember those 520 million vaccine doses. How can you generate far more deaths in 2021 – ascribing them to unvaccination – with a dramatically smaller number of unvaccinated people? In 2021, perhaps 20-40% of these group life insureds were unvaccinated. In 2020, 100% of them were unvaccinated, yet mortality barely rose. The math doesn’t come close to working.

The 40-44 age group, for example, suffered 21.5% more total deaths in 2021 than 2020. This terrible outcome occurred with less than half the so-called susceptible population due to their unvaccinated status. It’s difficult to assert robust vaccine effectiveness when both doses-delivered and deaths are skyrocketing.

On the other hand, the group life insurance data show vaccinated groups may have suffered the worse outcomes. By August, most large and mid-size companies and organizations across the country had vaccine mandates, and most employees complied. Yet these workers suffered extraordinary – indeed, totally unprecedented death rates – in 2021, especially the second half of 2021.

Ed Dowd, a former BlackRock portfolio manager, points to a crucial peculiarity in his book Cause Unknown. Employed people with group life insurance policies are far healthier than their overall population cohort. They typically die at a significantly lower rate, just 30-40% of the overall population. This is an iron actuarial law. In 2021, however, as you can see in the chart directly above, these employed Americans died at excess rates far higher than their larger pool of less healthy peers.

We could also point to fast-rising disability as a key factor in the worker shortage. Fed chair Powell blames it on long Covid. Once again, however, the timing doesn’t fit that story very well.

To overgeneralize:

In 2020, the vulnerable died of Covid at unusually high rates. In 2021 and 2022, Covid continued its assault, but the young, middle-aged, and healthy also died in aberrantly high numbers of something else.

These patterns are repeating across the high-income developed world – Germany, the UK, Japan, South Korea, Australia. We’ll examine these stories and survey the great work of other analysts in upcoming articles.

  • Demographics

How Job Risk and Human Capital Shape Male Lifetime Earnings Disparities

AI Summary. Men in the bottom of the lifetime earnings distribution are employed about 25% less than those at the median, giving them fewer chances to gain on-the-job experience or move to better-paying firms. Each additional year of work experience is associated with wage gains of about 2–3% for men below the 65th percentile, versus 8% at the top.

Serdar Ozkan and Cassandra Marks Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Date Posted:
January 20, 2023

.@stlouisfed finds that for workers in the bottom 65% of lifetime earnings, an additional year of work experience increases wages by 2-3% versus 8% for workers in the top 35%.

Does less stable employment widen lifetime earnings gaps among men?

Core argument: An additional year of work experience raises male wages by roughly 2–3% for workers below the 65th percentile of the income distribution, versus 8% for those at the top.

Bottom earners are employed about 25% less than those at the median, underscoring a less stable job ladder for them with fewer opportunities to learn on the job and to switch to better-paying firms.  The average returns to each additional year of work experience across the lifetime earnings (LE) distribution; the returns are relatively flatter in the bottom half of LE distribution and increase steeply toward the top. An additional year of work experience increases male workers’ wages by around 2% to 3% for workers below the 65th percentile of the income distribution, versus 8% for those at the top.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. An additional year of work experience raises male wages by roughly 2–3% for workers below the 65th percentile of the income distribution, versus 8% for those at the top.
  2. Male workers at the bottom of the lifetime earnings distribution are employed about 25% less than those at the median, with fewer opportunities to learn on the job and to switch to better-paying firms.
  3. Returns to each additional year of work experience are relatively flatter in the bottom half of the male lifetime earnings distribution and increase steeply toward the top.
  • Unemployment/Participation
  • Workforce
    • Poverty/Crime

What Drives Innovation?

AI Summary. Government procurement has repeatedly helped overcome market risk by pulling innovative suppliers down the learning curve until they can offer low-cost, reliable products to commercial markets. In these cases, the fit between product and market emerges from a state-initiated process aligning an immature product with a nascent market.

William Janeway Project Syndicate
Date Posted:
January 20, 2023

.@billjaneway argues that the procurement power of government can play an important role in reducing innovators’ and investors’ market risk. @ProSyn

.@billjaneway argues that the procurement power of government can play an important role in reducing innovators’ and...

Does government procurement drive innovation into commercial markets?

Core argument: Government procurement power recurs throughout the history of innovation, with the state helping overcome market risk by pulling innovative suppliers down the learning curve until they can offer low-cost, reliable products to commercial markets.

One recurring feature of that history has been the procurement power of governments. Freed from the necessity of abiding by a neat cost-benefit calculation, the state has repeatedly helped overcome market risk by pulling innovative suppliers down the learning curve to the point where they can offer low-cost and reliable products to commercial markets. In these cases, “product-market fit” results from a state-initiated dynamic process that succeeds in aligning an immature “product” with a nascent “market.”

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Government procurement power recurs throughout the history of innovation, with the state helping overcome market risk by pulling innovative suppliers down the learning curve until they can offer low-cost, reliable products to commercial markets.
  2. Freed from the necessity of abiding by a neat cost-benefit calculation, the state can support suppliers whose products remain immature.
  3. In such cases, "product-market fit" results from a state-initiated dynamic process that aligns an immature product with a nascent market.
  • Innovation/Research
  • Fiscal Policy
    • Government Spending
  • Productivity
    • Incentives/Risk-Taking

Russia Sanctions Update: CIS-picious Trading Patterns

AI Summary. Exports of manufactured goods to Russia have been rising, and exports to Russia's friendly neighbors far exceed pre-invasion levels, indicating weakening sanctions pressure. Exports of dual-use goods, including from Europe and China, are rising, which could let Russia restock lost military equipment and prolong the war.

Matt Klein The Overshoot
Date Posted:
January 20, 2023

According to @M_C_Klein, Russian imports have recovered as exports of goods delivered to Russia’s friendly neighbors have increased beyond pre-war levels suggesting export restrictions are being evaded.

Are trade flows through neighboring countries weakening sanctions pressure on Russia?

Core argument: Exports of manufactured goods to Russia have been rising rapidly, while exports of goods delivered to Russia's friendly neighbors are soaring far beyond pre-invasion norms, and the pressure on Russia from sanctions is fading.

The pressure on Russia from sanctions is fading. Exports of manufactured goods to Russia have been rising rapidly in recent months, while exports of goods delivered to Russia’s friendly neighbors are soaring far beyond pre-invasion norms. If export restrictions and sanctions enforcement cannot be tightened further, the Russians may be able to restock some of their lost military equipment—and prolong the war. The overall trend is that exports of dual-use goods are rising, including from Europe. Moreover, the Chinese data show that exports of dual-use goods continued to jump in December, even if Korean exports of dual-use goods has retreated somewhat from the surge in October. The detailed data from Turkey are not yet available, but it is possible that their exports of dual-use goods also jumped in December.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Exports of manufactured goods to Russia have been rising rapidly, while exports of goods delivered to Russia's friendly neighbors are soaring far beyond pre-invasion norms, and the pressure on Russia from sanctions is fading.
  2. Exports of dual-use goods to Russia are rising overall, including from Europe, with Chinese exports of such goods continuing to jump in December while Korean exports retreated somewhat from their October surge.
  3. Unless export restrictions and sanctions enforcement are tightened further, Russia may be able to restock some of its lost military equipment and prolong the war.
  • Security
  • GDP
    • Trade (not deficits)

Great Power Conflict Puts the Dollar’s Exorbitant Privilege Under Threat

AI Summary. Current account surpluses in China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia are being channeled less into traditional reserve assets such as US Treasuries, which offer negative real returns, and more into gold, commodities, geopolitical investments, and liquid bank deposits. Less dollar-invoiced trade and reduced recycling of surpluses into Treasuries could erode the dollar's reserve-currency privilege.

Zoltan Pozsar Financial Times
Date Posted:
January 20, 2023

Zoltan Pozsar of @CreditSuisse argues that the American dollar’s global role is under threat as the rise in Chinese, Russian and Saudi Arabian current account surpluses are not flowing into Treasuries as they have historically.

Zoltan Pozsar of @CreditSuisse argues that the American dollar’s global role is under threat as the rise in Chinese, Russian...

Is surplus nations' shift away from Treasuries threatening the dollar's privilege?

Core argument: The current account surpluses of China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia stand at a record, yet those surpluses are largely not being recycled into traditional reserve assets such as Treasuries, which offer negative real returns at current inflation rates.

The current account surpluses of China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia are at a record. Yet these surpluses are largely not being recycled into traditional reserve assets like Treasuries, which offer negative real returns at current inflation rates. Instead, we have seen more demand for gold, commodities, and geopolitical investments such as funding the [Belt and Road Initiative.] Leftover surpluses are held increasingly in bank deposits in liquid form to retain much-needed options in a changing world.  If less trade is invoiced in US dollars and there is a dwindling recycling of dollar surpluses into traditional reserve assets such as Treasuries, the “exorbitant privilege” that the dollar holds as the international reserve currency could be under assault.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. The current account surpluses of China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia stand at a record, yet those surpluses are largely not being recycled into traditional reserve assets such as Treasuries, which offer negative real returns at current inflation rates.
  2. Demand has instead grown for gold, commodities, and geopolitical investments such as funding the Belt and Road Initiative, with leftover surpluses held increasingly in liquid bank deposits to retain options.
  3. Less trade invoiced in US dollars, combined with dwindling recycling of dollar surpluses into traditional reserve assets such as Treasuries, could put the dollar's "exorbitant privilege" as the international reserve currency under assault.
  • Unemployment/Participation
  • GDP
    • Savings Glut/Trade Deficit
  • Workforce
    • Demographics

Pettis On Pozsar

AI Summary. China's record trade surplus makes it more, not less, dependent on the world's willingness to hold dollars, since currency dominance requires allowing transparent foreign ownership of domestic assets and giving up control of capital and trade accounts. Because China's reserve accumulation runs indirectly through state-bank dollar purchases, whether its dollar holdings have fallen is unclear.

Michael Pettis @michaelxpettis
Date Posted:
January 20, 2023

.@michaelxpettis argues that Zoltan Pozsar is wrong about the dollar’s global role. Chronic surplus countries’ dependence on American deficits, and in turn the dollar’s global role, is growing.

.@michaelxpettis argues that Zoltan Pozsar is wrong about the dollar’s global role. Chronic surplus countries’...

Does a record trade surplus make China more dependent on the dollar?

Core argument: Pettis argues that China's larger-than-ever trade surplus makes China more dependent, not less, on the willingness of China and the rest of the world to hold dollars, contrary to Pozsar's reading.

The irony is that while Pozsar correctly notes that China's trade surplus is bigger than ever, he doesn't realize that this makes China even more dependent, and not less dependent, on the willingness of China and the rest of the world to hold dollars. The key to global currency "domination" is not how excited the political elite say they are about having their currency dominate. It is how willing they are to allow clear and transparent foreign ownership of domestic assets and, even more importantly, how willing and able they are to give up control of their capital and trade accounts. Can we at least agree that China is reducing the dollar component of its reserves? Even that is questionable. China's reserve accumulation since 2017 has occurred indirectly, through state-bank purchases of dollars. We have no idea whether or not the amount of dollars China is holding has increased or decreased, but simple B-o-P arithmetic tells us that China's rising accumulation of foreign assets was mostly matched by rising foreign accumulation of US assets.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Pettis argues that China's larger-than-ever trade surplus makes China more dependent, not less, on the willingness of China and the rest of the world to hold dollars, contrary to Pozsar's reading.
  2. Pettis contends currency dominance depends on allowing clear and transparent foreign ownership of domestic assets and on willingness and ability to give up control of capital and trade accounts, not on political elites' stated enthusiasm.
  3. Pettis notes China's reserve accumulation since 2017 has occurred indirectly through state-bank purchases of dollars, leaving the direction of China's dollar holdings unknown, while balance-of-payments arithmetic indicates its foreign asset accumulation was mostly matched by foreign accumulation of US assets.
  • Savings Glut/Trade Deficit
  • GDP

Supply Chain Disruptions, Trade Costs, and Labor Markets

AI Summary. A model of elevated trade costs projects that U.S. labor supply falls by a cumulative 0.7% at its low point and remains 0.2% below its pre-shock level five years later. The decline occurs because higher trade costs make home production temporarily more attractive than working in industries hit by the trade disruption.

Andrés Rodríguez-Clare, Mauricio Ulate, and Jose Vasquez Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Date Posted:
January 20, 2023

Researchers at @sffed argue that higher transportation costs related to supply chain issues have had a negative impact on American labor force participation with the impact peaking this year.

How do higher trade costs reduce U.S. labor supply?

Core argument: The authors' model projects U.S. labor supply falls a cumulative 0.7% by 2022 during years of elevated trade costs, with a slow recovery leaving it 0.2% below its pre-shock level by 2027.

Our model suggests that overall U.S. labor supply declines during the years when trade costs are elevated and then begins to recover. The biggest cumulative drop of 0.7% occurs in 2022 and the recovery is slow. By 2027, labor supply is projected to still be 0.2% lower than its pre-shock level. The fall in labor supply occurs because, while trade costs are higher, focusing on home production activities that are not reliant on the labor market temporarily becomes more attractive for some people than working in industries that are affected by the trade disruption. The blue line in Figure 2 for the cumulative change in employment since 2019 combines the separate effects from labor force participation and unemployment (green and red lines). Even though the low point for labor supply occurs in 2022, our model does not project that the low point for employment will happen until 2023, due to the additional unemployment that is generated when the trade-cost shock dissipates.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. The authors' model projects U.S. labor supply falls a cumulative 0.7% by 2022 during years of elevated trade costs, with a slow recovery leaving it 0.2% below its pre-shock level by 2027.
  2. The model attributes the decline in labor supply to some people finding home production activities not reliant on the labor market temporarily more attractive than working in industries affected by the trade disruption.
  3. The model projects employment reaches its low point in 2023, a year after the 2022 low point for labor supply, because of additional unemployment generated when the trade-cost shock dissipates.
  • Trade (not deficits)
  • GDP
    • Business Cycle
  • Workforce
    • Unemployment/Participation

Where Did All the Workers Go?

AI Summary. The U.S. has recorded at least 400,000 unexpected deaths among working-age people since the pandemic began, excluding Covid-19 and unnatural causes such as homicides, suicides, and overdoses, with group life insurance payments up 20.7% over the five-year average. The Federal Reserve attributes part of a 3.5m labor force shortfall to these deaths.

Bret Swanson Infonomena
Date Posted:
January 20, 2023
Is Database:
Database

@BretSwanson notes at least 400,000 unexpected deaths among working-age US population since pandemic start, excluding Covid-19 & unnatural causes. Mortality rates for young & middle-aged workers surged, contributing to 3.5m labor force gap.

How much do excess working-age deaths explain the labor shortfall?

Core argument: The U.S. has recorded at least 400,000 unexpected deaths among working-age people since the pandemic's onset, excluding Covid-19 and unnatural causes such as homicides, suicides, and overdoses.

Since the pandemic's onset, the U.S. has experienced at least 400,000 unexpected deaths among its working-age population, excluding Covid-19 and unnatural causes like homicides, suicides, and overdoses. This spike began in 2021, with group life insurance payments rising by 20.7% over the five-year average and 15% over 2020. Despite 520m Covid-19 vaccine doses administered in 2021, mortality rates for young and middle-aged workers surged, with deaths from natural causes such as heart attacks and strokes increasing significantly. This unexpected rise in mortality has contributed to a labor force shortfall, with Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell attributing part of the 3.5m labor force gap to these deaths. The data suggests that while Covid-19 was a factor, other unexplained causes have driven this mortality increase, highlighting the need for improved data transparency to fully understand these trends and their economic implications.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. The U.S. has recorded at least 400,000 unexpected deaths among working-age people since the pandemic's onset, excluding Covid-19 and unnatural causes such as homicides, suicides, and overdoses.
  2. Group life insurance payments rose 20.7% above the five-year average and 15% above 2020, with the spike in working-age mortality beginning in 2021 and deaths from natural causes such as heart attacks and strokes rising.
  3. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell attributes part of the 3.5m labor force gap to these deaths, which the data suggest stem partly from causes other than Covid-19 that remain unexplained.

Breat Swanson notes there have been at least 400,000 unexpected deaths among the US working-age population since 2020. Netting out Covid deaths and unnatural deaths (homicide, suicide, overdose, etc.) he finds a spike starting in 2021.

Where Did All the Workers Go?: Extended Excerpt Image 1

“…In 2021 group life payments exploded by 20.7% over the five-year average and by 15% over the acute pandemic year of 2020. If we remove both Covid-19 and unnatural deaths (homicide, suicide, overdose, etc.), we see a dramatic spike of natural, non-Covid-19 deaths among working-age people beginning in the spring and summer of 2021. To overgeneralize: In 2020, the vulnerable died of Covid at unusually high rates. In 2021 and 2022, Covid continued its assault, but the young, middle-aged, and healthy also died in aberrantly high numbers of something else….”

Bret Swanson, "Where Did All the Workers Go?,"Infonomena, January 19, 2023, https://infonomena.substack.com/p/whered-all-the-workers-go

Where Did All the Workers Go?

In a November 30, 2022, speech on “Inflation and the Labor Market,” Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell blamed most of the 3.5 million estimated shortfall in the U.S. labor force on premature retirements. He also blamed a large portion - between 280,000 and 680,000 - on “long Covid.” In a footnote, however, Powell acknowledged a far more somber factor: an estimated 400,000 unexpected deaths among working age people.

It’s easy to blame these deaths on Covid-19. The virus is of course one significant cause. But it’s not nearly the only cause, especially among young and middle-age workers. We need better government data transparency to make a full assessment. Until then, we can proceed with others who track mortality for a living - life insurance companies.

The Great Divide - 2020 vs. 2021

In 2020, Covid-19 took many lives, even among select groups of middle-age people, specifically those with comorbidities such as diabetes. In 2020, Covid did not take very many lives of healthy young and middle-age people - for example, the types of people who are employed at large and mid-size companies and who have group life insurance. As you can see in the chart below, group life insurance benefit payments in 2020 were barely higher than in 2018.

Where Did All the Workers Go?: Extended Excerpt Image 2


In 2021, however, group life payments exploded by 20.7% over the five year average and by 15% over the acute pandemic year of 2020. Why would healthy young and middle-age people suddenly begin dying in large numbers in 2021 when they’d navigated 2020 with relative success?

Especially when we consider that in 2021, the U.S. administered 520 million Covid-19 vaccine doses. Shouldn’t healthy people employed in good jobs with good benefits, now protected with vaccines, have fared better in 2021 than in 2020? Surely, overdoses and suicides have risen in recent years. But those causes of death are less prominent among the group life cohorts in general, and the latest data confirm these were not drivers of the group life surge. Curiously, two of the largest spikes in 2021 came from deadly automobile accidents and non-automobile accidents.

Millennial Mortality

Let’s look at a few of these young adult age groups in more detail. In the charts below, we’ve broken out total all-cause deaths into three groups - 30-34, 35-39, and 40-44. Eyeballing the age group charts alone shows that factors other than Covid-19 itself must have driven large portions of the mortality spike in young and middle-age workers. (We are using official statistics, which likely overstate Covid mortality and understate non-Covid mortality. It’s the best we’ve got for now.)

The most important overall point is that 2021 was far worse for young and middle-age people than 2020.

Another key point is that 2022 was also worse than 2020, though not as bad as 2021.

Mortality rates in 2022 were still dramatically higher than the pre-pandemic baseline.

Covid-19 hit hard in 2020, especially for the old, vulnerable, and comorbid. In other words, Covid-19 took many of the most unhealthy from us in 2020. In principle, therefore, a smaller number unhealthy people might have been susceptible to Covid-19 in 2021 and 2022. High mortality years are often followed by low mortality years. After two successive high mortality years, the third year is even more likely to be low-mortality. For 2022 to be as bad, or somewhat worse, than 2020, is thus a big surprise. Last year’s milder Omicron variants make 2022’s stubbornly high mortality rate even more baffling.

All-cause mortality is crucial to understand whether public health policies are working. All-cause numbers can also help expose faulty reasoning when overly narrow, overly complicated, or overly clever analyses miss or hide important signals. For example, an analysis which purported to show lockdowns reduced Covid deaths but which neglected to show other deaths rose even more, would not reflect the totality of the policy’s effects. Likewise, a chemotherapy which shrinks tumors but kills patients may be successful in its narrow task yet fail the larger mission. Most analysts and health authorities studiously ignored all-cause over the last three years. The all-cause figures above show our Covid policies were far from successful.

For other purposes, however, it’s helpful and even necessary to drill down on specific causes. Important signals can also be lost in large groupings - Simpson’s paradox, for example, is a common statistical illusion. (Few have dug deeper, with as much specificity, as John Beaudoin, an engineer from Massachusetts who gained access to his state’s digital death records for the last eight years. He shows that specific causes of death spike and fall at important moments and periods. CDC data is not organized with such granularity. More on Beaudoin’s analysis in coming weeks…)

We know that recent years saw an upswing in drug overdoses and suicides, which accelerated with the pandemic lockdowns. Although these troubling trends cannot explain the enormous and unprecedented all-cause mortality seen above, we should attempt to account for them. Likewise, although Covid-19 did not cause all these record deaths, it was a significant factor.

Employment Aberration

So we dig deeper. If we remove both Covid-19 and unnatural deaths (homicide, suicide, overdose, etc.), we see a dramatic spike of natural, non-Covid-19 deaths among working age people beginning in the spring and summer of 2021. The CDC then stopped publishing the detailed data breaking out these particular categories.

Where Did All the Workers Go?: Extended Excerpt Image 3


But we know this trend continued. In fact, it got much worse. The life insurance companies told us so. On a December 30, 2021, videoconference with the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, OneAmerica CEO Scott Davison reported with shock:

“And what we saw just in third quarter, we’re seeing it continue into fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic.”

“40% is just unheard of.”

“It may not all be COVID on their death certificate, but deaths are up just huge, huge numbers.”

Several months later, Lincoln National reported its 2021 payouts were $1.4 billion, versus $548 million in 2020, a 164% rise.

As you will remember seeing in our three all-cause charts, August, September, and October of 2021 showed a gigantic upward bubble - the worst ever period of concentrated young and middle-age deaths, at least in modern times.

Heart attacks, strokes, pulmonary embolisms, accidents, and many seemingly-inexplicable sudden deaths, which continued into 2022, and now in 2023. Here is the Society of Actuaries November 2022 update, which goes through June 2022.

Where Did All the Workers Go?: Extended Excerpt Image 4


It’s true that the late summer and fall period of 2021 coincided with the Delta wave in the U.S., which was more infectious and appeared to be more pathogenic than previous variants. (We’ve suggested the mass vaccination programs may have, by exerting extreme evolutionary pressure, driven convergence onto more infectious, vaccine-evading variants. Brand Research just published in the New England Journal of Medicine continues to bolster our escape variant thesis: Substantial Neutralization Escape by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variants BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.)

Federal officials and the medical establishment, you will recall, argued in 2021 that it was a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” Even the Society of Actuaries attempts to explain away its alarming findings by implying the deaths are due to lack of vaccination. It does so with crude regressions of excess mortality and bulk state-wide vaccination totals as of June 30, 2021.

But remember those 520 million vaccine doses. How can you generate far more deaths in 2021 - ascribing them to unvaccination - with a dramatically smaller number of unvaccinated people? In 2021, perhaps 20-40% of these group life insureds were unvaccinated. In 2020, 100% of them were unvaccinated, yet mortality barely rose. The math doesn’t come close to working.

The 40-44 age group, for example, suffered 21.5% more total deaths in 2021 than 2020. This terrible outcome occurred with less than half the so-called susceptible population due to their unvaccinated status. It’s difficult to assert robust vaccine effectiveness when both doses-delivered and deaths are skyrocketing.

On the other hand, the group life insurance data show vaccinated groups may have suffered the worse outcomes. By August, most large and mid-size companies and organizations across the country had vaccine mandates, and most employees complied. Yet these workers suffered extraordinary - indeed, totally unprecedented death rates - in 2021, especially the second half of 2021.

Where Did All the Workers Go?: Extended Excerpt Image 5


Ed Dowd, a former BlackRock portfolio manager, points to a crucial peculiarity in his book Cause Unknown. Employed people with group life insurance policies are far healthier than their overall population cohort. They typically die at a significantly lower rate, just 30-40% of the overall population. This is an iron actuarial law. In 2021, however, as you can see in the chart directly above, these employed Americans died at excess rates far higher than their larger pool of less healthy peers.

We could also point to fast-rising disability as a key factor in the worker shortage. Fed chair Powell blames it on long Covid. Once again, however, the timing doesn’t fit that story very well.

To overgeneralize:

In 2020, the vulnerable died of Covid at unusually high rates. In 2021 and 2022, Covid continued its assault, but the young, middle-aged, and healthy also died in aberrantly high numbers of something else.

These patterns are repeating across the high-income developed world - Germany, the UK, Japan, South Korea, Australia. We’ll examine these stories and survey the great work of other analysts in upcoming articles.

  • Business Cycle
  • GDP
  • Healthcare/Seniors
  • Workforce
    • Demographics


Loading More Posts

End of content

No more pages to load

© Copyright 2026 Coherent Research Institute · All Rights Reserved · Privacy · Terms