Edward Conard

Top Ten New York Times Bestselling Author

  • “…reminds us that inequality sends a signal of what society lacks most, in America’s case, entrepreneurship and risk taking.” - Lawrence Lindsey, CEO, The Lindsey Group, former Director of the National Economic Council
  • “Unintended Consequences provides a provocative interpretation of the causes of the global financial crisis and the policies needed to return to rapid growth. Whether you agree or not, this analysis is well worth reading.” - Nouriel Roubini, New York University; Chairman, Roubini Global Economics
  • “…reminds us that inequality sends a signal of what society lacks most, in America’s case, entrepreneurship and risk taking.” - Lawrence Lindsey, CEO, The Lindsey Group, former Director of the National Economic Council
  • “Unintended Consequences offers deep and well-argued analyses on almost every issue.” - The New York Times
  • “…serious thinking for serious thinkers. …a thought-provoking blueprint for growing middle- and working-class incomes.” - Mitt Romney, former Governor of Massachusetts
  • “A full-throated defense of economic dynamism.” - The Wall Street Journal
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “…a very valuable contribution.” - Larry Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury and director of the National Economic Council, president emeritus, Harvard University
  • “…a must-read for serious students of economic policy.” - Glenn Hubbard, Dean, Columbia Business School, and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
  • “…a must-read for serious students of economic policy.” - Glenn Hubbard, Dean, Columbia Business School, and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “…serious thinking for serious thinkers. …a thought-provoking blueprint for growing middle- and working-class incomes.” - Mitt Romney, former Governor of Massachusetts
Upside of Inequality Oxford Unintended Consequences
Buy the Books
  • Macro Roundup
  • About Roundup
  • About Ed Conard
  • Highlights
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
Edward Conard
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • youtube

Macro Roundup

  • Email
  • Text Message (SMS)
  • Twitter/X
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp Message
Subscribe to Macro Roundup Emails
Select topics to choose: articles that mention them (broader) or articles mainly about them (focused)
  • Mentions 0
  • Primary focus 0
Showing all 7,294 Macro Roundup articles
When you search for any topic (like GDP, Inflation, or Banking), choose:
Choose search scope

Thursday, January 5, 2023

Guide To The Markets

AI Summary. US consumers accumulated a peak $2.1tn in excess savings relative to the pre-pandemic trend and have since been drawing those savings down. Household debt payments equaled 9.8% of disposable personal income, below a peak of 13.2%.

JP Morgan Staff J.P. Morgan
Date Posted:
January 5, 2023
Is Database:
Database

J.P. Morgan estimates consumers still have $900B of excess savings, down from a peak of $2.1B in August 2021.

Are consumers drawing down excess savings while debt burdens stay low?

Core argument: Consumers accumulated a peak $2.1 trillion in excess savings relative to the pre-pandemic trend between March 2020 and August 2021.

From March 2020 to August 2021, consumers amassed a peak $2.1 trillion in excess savings relative to the pre-pandemic trend. Since August 2021, consumers have drawn down on these excess savings. Household debt payments were 9.8% of disposable personal income in Q4 ’22 vs. a peak of 13.2% in Q4 of ’04.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Consumers accumulated a peak $2.1 trillion in excess savings relative to the pre-pandemic trend between March 2020 and August 2021.
  2. Consumers have drawn down these excess savings since August 2021.

J.P. Morgan estimates consumers still have $900B of excess savings, down from a peak of $2.1B in August 2021.

From March 2020 to August 2021, consumers amassed a peak $2.1 trillion in excess savings relative to the pre-pandemic trend. Since August 2021, consumers have drawn down on these excess savings. Household debt payments were 9.8% of disposable personal income in Q4 ’22 vs. a peak of 13.2% in Q4 of ’04.

JPM Staff, "Guide To The Markets," J.P. Morgan, January 2023, https://am.jpmorgan.com/us/en/asset-management/adv/insights/market-insights/guide-to-the-markets/

  • Business Cycle
  • GDP

Retirements, Net Worth, and the Fall and Rise of Labor Force Participation

AI Summary. Households aged 55–74 lost an average of over $100,000 in net worth amid falling asset returns, reversing part of their earlier gains, reflecting their large holdings of stocks and bonds. The authors estimate this decline in asset values may have drawn an extra 170,000 people aged 51–65 back into the labor force.

Miguel Faria e Castro and Sam Jordan-Wood Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Date Posted:
January 5, 2023
Is Database:
Database

.@mfariacastro at @stlouisfed estimates that the decline in asset values in 2022 drove 170,000 workers aged 51-65 back into the labor force. This represents 16% of the increase in LFP from Jan through Oct 2022.

Do falling asset values push older workers back into the labor force?

Core argument: Households headed by people aged 55–74 lost on average over $100,000 in net worth between January and October 2022, partly reversing gains from 2020–21 that were particularly high for these age groups.

The figure above plots the estimated average change in net worth per head of household age category during 2022. People between the ages of 55 and 74 lost, on average, over $100,000 in net worth due to falling asset returns between January and October 2022. This partly reverses some of the net worth gains in 2020-21, which were particularly high for these age groups. This is explained by the high exposure (in absolute terms) of people in these age groups to asset classes such as stocks and bonds, which performed reasonably well in 2020-21 but posted significant negative returns during 2022. Focusing on only people between the ages of 51 and 65, whose decision to participate in the labor force tends to be more sensitive to wealth effects, we find that the decline in asset values may have caused an extra 170,000 people to return to the labor force. This corresponds to an increase in the LFP rate of 0.06 percentage points, or about 16% of the total increase observed through October 2022.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Households headed by people aged 55–74 lost on average over $100,000 in net worth between January and October 2022, partly reversing gains from 2020–21 that were particularly high for these age groups.
  2. The decline in asset values may have caused an extra 170,000 people aged 51–65 to return to the labor force, an estimated increase of 0.06 percentage points in the labor force participation rate.
  3. That estimated wealth-driven return to work corresponds to about 16% of the total increase in labor force participation observed through October 2022.

FRBSL estimates that the decline in asset values in 2022 drove 170,000 workers aged 51-65 back into the labor force. This represents 16% of the increase in LFP from Jan through Oct 2022.

“…The figure above plots the estimated average change in net worth per head of household age category during 2022. People between the ages of 55 and 74 lost, on average, over $100,000 in net worth due to falling asset returns between January and October 2022. This partly reverses some of the net worth gains in 2020-21, which were particularly high for these age groups. This is explained by the high exposure (in absolute terms) of people in these age groups to asset classes such as stocks and bonds, which performed reasonably well in 2020-21 but posted significant negative returns during 2022. Focusing on only people between the ages of 51 and 65, whose decision to participate in the labor force tends to be more sensitive to wealth effects, we find that the decline in asset values may have caused an extra 170,000 people to return to the labor force. This corresponds to an increase in the LFP rate of 0.06 percentage points, or about 16% of the total increase observed through October 2022….”

Miguel Faria e Castro and Sam Jordan-Wood, “Retirements, Net Worth, and the Fall and Rise of Labor Force Participation,” Federal Reserve Bank Of St. Louis, January 5, 2023, https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2023/jan/retirements-net-worth-labor-force-participation

Retirements, Net Worth, and the Fall and Rise of Labor Force Participation

The uncertainty surrounding financial markets during the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to many atypical trends. A 2021 Economic Synopses essay discussed the retirement boom spurred by COVID-19, which may have contributed to a persistent decline in labor force participation (LFP). Labor force participation is the percentage of the civilian noninstitutional population age 16 and older that is employed or actively looking for work. At the same time, returns on some common asset classes—housing and stocks—were abnormally high. This led to large estimated increases in household net worth during 2020-21.

Standard economic theory offers a natural link between the two trends of rising wealth and declining labor force participation. We call this link the wealth effect on labor supply: Holding everything else constant, an increase in wealth tends to reduce labor supply both at the intensive (how many hours should I work?) and extensive (should I work at all?) margins.

The increase in wealth during 2020 and 2021 plausibly contributed to the fall in labor force participation: As cited in a 2022 Economic Synopses essay, through September 2021, about 15% of the observed drop in LFP could be attributed to rising asset valuations; when we updated those calculations to include all of 2021, rising valuations accounted for about 20% of the drop. Even if changes in net worth were not the primary driver of retirements and labor force exits in the previous period, they certainly compounded them.

More recently, during 2022, we observed a reversal of these two trends: The recovery of labor force participation seemed to accelerate somewhat, as seen in the first figure below; this was especially true among older workers. Additionally, we observed a stabilization or even reversal of the large real gains posted by asset classes such as stocks and housing observed in 2020-21, as shown in the second figure. In this blog post, we update our previous analysis to account for the recent period of falling and negative financial returns across asset classes.

Updating the Data to 2022: Falling Financial Returns

In this post, we update key figures using two different time periods: 2020-21 and 2022. COVID-19 obviously did not end in 2022, but it was much less of an issue than it was in 2020 or 2021.

In 2022, the Federal Reserve started tightening monetary policy, which may have affected asset prices. Thus, standard economic theory suggests that we should have seen the opposite effects in 2022—falling asset prices and returns should have contributed to people returning to the labor force. There are, naturally, other reasons why the LFP rate should have recovered: The risk of contracting serious illness from COVID-19 was plausibly lower in 2022 than it was in 2020, and labor markets were extremely tight. Tight labor markets mean that employers have to compete for workers, with many doing so by raising worker compensation.

Stocks, housing and bonds constitute the three major asset classes held (directly or indirectly) by U.S. households. For the years 2020 and 2021, the first two asset classes posted high real returns, with the third posting modest but positive returns. These trends clearly inverted in 2022. The real return on stocks, as measured by the S&P 500 Index, was -25% for the year through October 2022, while the real return on housing was essentially zero for the same period. The real return on corporate bonds was -24%.

We use data from the 2019 Survey of Consumer Finances to estimate the impact of these real returns on the net worth of a representative sample of U.S. households. The figure below plots the estimated average change in net worth per head of household age category during 2022. People between the ages of 55 and 74 lost, on average, over $100,000 in net worth due to falling asset returns between January and October 2022. This partly reverses some of the net worth gains in 2020-21, which were particularly high for these age groups. This is explained by the high exposure (in absolute terms) of people in these age groups to asset classes such as stocks and bonds, which performed reasonably well in 2020-21 but posted significant negative returns during 2022.

Effects of Declining Net Worth on Labor Force Participation

As previously mentioned, the LFP rate recovered slightly during 2022: from 61.9% in December 2021 to 62.2% in October 2022. The large declines in net worth shown in the last figure could have influenced the decision to return to the labor force by many who left during 2020-21.

We apply the same methodology as in our previous work to try to determine how much of this 0.3 percentage point increase in the LFP rate can be attributed to falling asset values. Focusing on only people between the ages of 51 and 65, whose decision to participate in the labor force tends to be more sensitive to wealth effects, we find that the decline in asset values may have caused an extra 170,000 people to return to the labor force. This corresponds to an increase in the LFP rate of 0.06 percentage points, or about 16% of the total increase observed through October 2022. If, instead, we consider all people age 51 and older, we find that falling asset values may have contributed to about 380,000 people joining the labor force, which would account for 36% of the increase in the number of people in the labor force.

Again, it should be noted that falling asset values may be just one among several reasons why people are returning to the labor force. Lower risk of contracting severe illness, tight labor markets and potentially more attractive working arrangements (such as the flexibility to work from home) may be other primary reasons.

  • Unemployment/Participation

The Layers of Inflation Persistence

AI Summary. The authors estimate that the persistent component of core personal consumption inflation declined after a long stretch of high, essentially constant persistence. Core goods and core services excluding housing have been moderating, while housing inflation continued to rise on a sector-specific trend and accounts for a sizable share of the increase.

Martín Almuzara, Marek Jarocinski, and Argia Sbordone Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Date Posted:
January 5, 2023

.@NewYorkFed notes evidence of an ongoing decline in core PCE inflation starting in September 2022, with the exception of housing costs.

Has the persistent component of core inflation declined?

Core argument: The authors find the persistent component of core PCE inflation began declining in September 2022, following a long stretch of high and essentially constant inflation persistence.

We find evidence of a decline in the size of the persistent component of core PCE inflation starting in September 2022. The decline follows a long period of high and essentially constant inflation persistence. Dissecting the layers of aggregate inflation provides further insights: core goods and core services ex-housing have been moderating since early 2022, reflecting the evolution of the common component, while housing has continued to move up, driven by its own sector-specific trend. The chart below shows a sectoral decomposition of the increase in inflation from its pre-pandemic average. The chart shows that the persistent component of housing represents a fair amount of the overall increase in trend, comparable to the contribution of core goods and core services ex-housing.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. The authors find the persistent component of core PCE inflation began declining in September 2022, following a long stretch of high and essentially constant inflation persistence.
  2. Core goods and core services excluding housing have been moderating since early 2022 in line with a common component, while housing inflation has continued to rise on its own sector-specific trend.
  3. A sectoral decomposition shows housing's persistent component accounts for a share of the increase in inflation trend above its pre-pandemic average comparable to the contributions of core goods and core services ex-housing.
  • Inflation
  • GDP

Chinese Researchers Claim to Find Way to Break Encryption Using Quantum Computers

AI Summary. Chinese researchers claim to have found a method to break RSA encryption, the most common form of online encryption, using current-generation quantum computers, far earlier than the technology was expected to pose a threat. Security experts question the claim, noting the researchers did not show how fast the algorithm would run.

Richard Waters Financial Times
Date Posted:
January 5, 2023

Chinese computer scientists claimed to have used quantum computing to break the RSA algorithm that underpins the vast majority of online encryption. However, the algorithm may not be fast enough to be relevant. @FT

Chinese computer scientists claimed to have used quantum computing to break the RSA algorithm that underpins the vast...

Can current quantum computers break the most common online encryption?

Core argument: Chinese researchers claim to have found a way to break the RSA algorithm, the most common form of online encryption, using the current generation of quantum computers, years before the technology was expected to pose a threat.

Computer security experts were struggling this week to assess a startling claim by Chinese researchers that they have found a way to break the [RSA algorithm,] the most common form of online encryption, using the current generation of quantum computers, years before the technology was expected to pose a threat. Peter Shor, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology scientist whose 1994 algorithm proving that a quantum machine could defeat online encryption, noted that the Chinese researchers had “failed to address how fast the algorithm will run”, and said that it was possible it “will still take millions of years”. He said: “In the absence of any analysis showing that it will be faster, I suspect that the most likely scenario is that it’s not much of an improvement.”

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Chinese researchers claim to have found a way to break the RSA algorithm, the most common form of online encryption, using the current generation of quantum computers, years before the technology was expected to pose a threat.
  2. Peter Shor, the MIT scientist whose 1994 algorithm proved a quantum machine could defeat online encryption, noted the Chinese researchers "failed to address how fast the algorithm will run" and said it was possible it "will still take millions of years".
  3. Computer security experts were struggling to assess the Chinese claim, with Shor saying that absent analysis showing the method is faster, the most likely scenario is that it is "not much of an improvement".
  • Innovation/Research
  • Productivity

Laid-Off Tech Workers Quickly Find New Jobs

AI Summary. About 79% of workers hired after a tech-company layoff or termination found their new job within three months of starting their search, just below the 83% share among all laid-off workers, according to a survey of new hires. Nearly four in ten previously laid-off tech workers found jobs in under a month.

Sarah Chaney Cambon and Gwynn Guilford Wall Street Journal
Date Posted:
January 5, 2023
Is Database:
Database

According to recent surveys, recently laid-off tech workers are quickly finding new employment with 40% accepting a new position within 30 days. @WSJ

Do laid-off tech workers find new jobs quickly?

Core argument: About 79% of workers hired after a tech-company layoff or termination found their new job within three months of starting their search, according to a ZipRecruiter survey of new hires.

About 79% of workers recently hired after a tech-company layoff or termination landed their new job within three months of starting their search, according to a ZipRecruiter survey of new hires. That was just below the 83% share of all laid-off workers who were re-employed in the same time frame. Nearly four in ten previously laid-off tech workers found jobs less than a month after they began searching, ZipRecruiter found in the survey.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. About 79% of workers hired after a tech-company layoff or termination found their new job within three months of starting their search, according to a ZipRecruiter survey of new hires.
  2. The 79% re-employment share for laid-off tech workers was just below the 83% share of all laid-off workers re-employed within the same three-month window, ZipRecruiter found.
  3. Nearly 40% of previously laid-off tech workers landed jobs less than a month after beginning their search, according to the ZipRecruiter survey.

According to recent surveys, recently laid-off tech workers are quickly finding new employment with 40% accepting a new position within 30 days.

Description automatically generated

“…About 79% of workers recently hired after a tech-company layoff or termination landed their new job within three months of starting their search, according to a ZipRecruiter survey of new hires. That was just below the 83% share of all laid-off workers who were re-employed in the same time frame. Nearly four in ten previously laid-off tech workers found jobs less than a month after they began searching, ZipRecruiter found in the survey…”

Sarah Chaney Cambon and Gwynn Guilford, “Laid Off Tech Workers Quickly Find New Jobs,” Wall Street Journal, December 27, 2022, https://www.wsj.com/articles/laid-off-tech-workers-quickly-find-new-jobs-11672097730

Laid Off Tech Workers Quickly Find New Jobs

Most laid off tech workers are finding jobs shortly after beginning their search, a new survey shows, as employers continue to scoop up workers in a tight labor market.

About 79% of workers recently hired after a tech-company layoff or termination landed their new job within three months of starting their search, according to a ZipRecruiter survey of new hires. That was just below the 83% share of all laid-off workers who were re-employed in the same time frame.

Nearly four in 10 previously laid off tech workers found jobs less than a month after they began searching, ZipRecruiter found in the survey.

“Despite the widespread layoffs, hiring freezes, and cost-cutting taking place in tech, many tech workers are finding reemployment remarkably quickly,” said Julia Pollak, chief economist at ZipRecruiter. “They’re still the most sought-after workers with the most in-demand skills.”

https://www.staging4.edwardconard.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/image002-24.png

Job openings across the economy—at 10.3 million—are down from record highs but far exceed the number of unemployed Americans, providing opportunities for workers who lose their jobs and those who choose to seek another.

Workers previously employed in other industries, including entertainment and leisure, transportation and delivery, and manufacturing, also found new jobs quickly, the ZipRecruiter data showed.

The job market for tech workers is slowing as the broader economy falters under the pressure of Federal Reserve interest rate increases and high inflation. Layoffs and hiring freezes are occurring at startups and large tech companies such as Amazon.com Inc. and Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc. that hired aggressively early on in the pandemic. The cuts are hitting workers in tech jobs—such as software engineers—and other corporate roles including recruiters.

Still, tech firms making cuts are outnumbered by those that are hiring.

A smaller share of tech workers is spending long periods searching for work after a layoff. About 5% of laid off tech workers who found jobs from April to October had spent more than six months hunting for work, down from 26% of those hired between August 2021 and February 2022, ZipRecruiter said.

Wen Huber, age 23, was laid off from a videographer job at a real estate tech startup in late July. Mr. Huber, who lives near Seattle, thought it would take awhile to land a new position, given he didn’t have a four-year-college degree and many other job seekers were flooding the tech job market.

“When I was applying, to be honest, I didn’t feel very confident because there was such an influx of competition with a lot of people also being laid off,” he said.

Mr. Huber had built up a savings buffer, allowing him to be more selective in his job hunt as he sought to pivot into social media. He documented his unemployment experience in a series of videos on LinkedIn. The videos helped him land an interview—and ultimately an offer—for a social media manager job at a software startup, Mr. Huber said. He started in September.

“I was surprised at how quickly I was able to secure an offer for a job,” he said.

Short job searches in tech have become slightly less common as the labor market slows from earlier in the year. Among people who recently lost a job and worked in tech previously, 37% found a new position within one month of starting to look, according to ZipRecruiter. That compared with 50% in February’s survey.

“We’ve definitely seen a slowdown in hiring, but the reason why is that the job creation level was beyond record highs because of the slingshot effect of the pandemic,” said Ryan Sutton, district president at Robert Half, a global recruitment firm. “From August 2020 to May 2022, it wasn’t red-hot. It was lava-hot.”

Usually when mass layoffs hit, there is an influx of tech candidates contacting his company to help with their job search, Mr. Sutton said.

“We have not seen it yet—we haven’t seen more candidates coming to market,” he said. “Our recruiters are having to hunt and hustle just as much as they had to in the last couple of years.”

Client firms in tech also haven’t mentioned any plans to cut jobs, Mr. Sutton said.

About 74% of workers recently hired after losing or leaving a job at a tech company remained in the industry, according to ZipRecruiter. Others who previously worked at tech companies switched to firms in industries such as retail, financial services and healthcare in the six months ending in mid-October.

Pinnacol Assurance, a 650-person workers’ compensation insurer, saw a 46% increase in job candidates from big tech companies including Meta, Microsoft and Twitter between September and mid-December, said Tim Johnson, the company’s chief human resources officer.

The influx of applicants has helped Pinnacol fill tech-related roles such as data scientist, machine-learning engineer and cloud architect in recent months. In mid-December, Pinnacol’s recruiting team made an offer to a job candidate from Google, Mr. Johnson said.

Ayanna Chapman, 42, started a systems-engineering job job at Pinnacol overseeing its computer systems in mid-November after she was laid off from another systems-engineer position this spring.

A generous severance package allowed her to take several months to freshen skills and study for certifications including in the Python programming language. When the Atlanta–area resident began looking for work in the second week of October, recruiters quickly reached out with interview opportunities, she said.

Ms. Chapman was keen on finding a job with stability and thought Pinnacol would fit. She received an offer from the Denver–based company about two weeks after beginning the interview process, much faster than previous experiences, she said.

“I literally cried tears of joy like, ‘Oh, my God, I got the job. I can’t believe it,’” Ms. Chapman said.

Employers broadly are responding to job candidates fast, likely for fear of losing them in a competitive market with a historically low jobless rate of 3.7%. Nine in 10 ZipRecruiter survey respondents said they heard back from a recruiter or hiring manager within a week of applying for a job.

ZipRecruiter’s most recent survey was drawn from 2,550 U.S. residents who had started a new job within the six months ending in mid-October. The data align with other job-market figures that signal the hot labor market is cooling.

Of the ZipRecruiter survey respondents who said they previously worked in tech, most of them likely worked for tech companies regardless of their occupation, Ms. Pollak said. In other words, a recruiter at Amazon would likely be classified as a tech-industry worker in the survey. But a data scientist at Home Depot would be a retail-industry worker.

Separate labor-market figures suggest employers across industries are still seeking to hire tech workers, though less so than earlier in the pandemic. Postings on job-site Indeed for tech occupations are still well above prepandemic levels, but have fallen steeply over the past year.

Software developer job ads on Indeed are down 34% from a year earlier, and ads for mathematics roles—which include data scientists—are 28% lower. Overall postings are down 7.7% from a year ago.

“With tech workers, it’s a much bigger pullback,” said Nick Bunker, an economist at Indeed Hiring Lab. “It’s still above prepandemic levels, but if the current trend keeps up, I don’t imagine that talking point will be true anymore at some point next year.”

The uncertain economic outlook is likely weighing on employers’ appetite for white-collar workers, since they tend to base hiring plans for higher-paid workers on the longer-term business outlook, said Mr. Bunker. By contrast, firms usually gear hiring for waiters, deliverers and other lower-paid jobs according to immediate business needs, he said.

Many companies with among the highest shares of new tech job postings on Indeed in late November were in industries such as consulting, financial services and aerospace.

“For tech jobs, it is still a relatively healthy economic climate and relatively healthy labor market,” said Scott Dobroski, Indeed career expert. “A lot of bright spots for tech workers currently lie outside of traditional tech companies.”

U.S. aerospace companies cut more than 100,000 workers during the pandemic, but have been hiring back at a fast clip and struggling for a year with staffing shortages that have crimped supply chains.

Raytheon Technologies Corp. CEO Greg Hayes said during the summer he was optimistic that layoffs among tech companies would start to ease his own hiring challenges. There are signs that is happening.

“We are starting to see an uptick in interest from the tech layoffs,” said Mike Dippold, chief financial officer of Leonardo DRS Inc., which is based Arlington, Va.

Mr. Dippold said the defense-sensor specialist, like many peers, still had more open positions than it would like, but the staffing situation was starting to improve.

  • Unemployment/Participation
  • GDP
    • Business Cycle
  • Workforce

Capital Allocation: Results, Analysis and Assessment

AI Summary. Capital expenditures net of depreciation for Russell 3000 companies peaked at 6.9% of sales in 1988, averaged 1.8% over the past decade, and fell to 0.5% in 2020. Because depreciation is based on historical costs, rising prices mean replacement spending often exceeds depreciation, and technology can make assets obsolete sooner.

Michael Mauboussin and Dan Callahan Morgan Stanley
Date Posted:
January 5, 2023
Is Database:
Database

Capital expenditures net of depreciation for the Russell 3000 peaked at 6.9% of sales in 1988, but has since declined to 1.8% on average in the past decade, highlighting a shift in capital allocation strategies.

Have net capital expenditures declined as a share of company sales?

Core argument: Capital expenditures net of depreciation for the Russell 3000 peaked at 6.9% of sales in 1988, averaged 1.8% over the past decade, and fell to 0.5% in 2020 amid the pandemic.

Capital expenditures net of depreciation for the Russell 3000 peaked at 6.9% of sales in 1988, highlighting a period of robust investment. However, this figure has significantly declined over the years, averaging 1.8% in the past decade and reaching a low of 0.5% in 2020 amid the pandemic. This trend underscores a shift in capital allocation strategies, influenced by factors such as inflation and technological obsolescence. Rising prices, as seen in 2022, mean that capital expenditures to replace equipment often exceed depreciation, which is calculated on historical costs. Additionally, technological advancements can render assets obsolete faster than depreciation schedules account for, potentially overstating an asset's useful life. These dynamics suggest that businesses must carefully consider both current economic conditions and future technological changes when planning capital investments.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Capital expenditures net of depreciation for the Russell 3000 peaked at 6.9% of sales in 1988, averaged 1.8% over the past decade, and fell to 0.5% in 2020 amid the pandemic.
  2. Rising prices, as in 2022, mean capital expenditures to replace equipment often exceed depreciation, which is calculated on historical costs.
  3. Technological advances can render assets obsolete faster than depreciation schedules account for, potentially overstating an asset's useful life.

Michael Mauboussin and Dan Callahan shows capital expenditures net of depreciation as a percentage of sales peaked in 1988 at 6.9%. Over the past decade it has averaged 1.8% and fell to 0.5% in 2020 during the pandemic. (200)

Exhibit 25 shows capital expenditures minus depreciation for the population we studied. Using this measure, investment as a percentage of sales peaked in 1988 at 6.9% and bottomed in 2020 at 0.5 percent of sales. The average of the past decade was 1.8%. The two substantial limitations to using depreciation as a proxy for maintenance capital expenditures include inflation and the risk of technological obsolescence. In periods of rising prices (such as 2022), the capital expenditures required to replace new equipment will exceed depreciation because new expenditures reflect inflation whereas depreciation is based on historical costs. Technological obsolescence introduces the likelihood that depreciation overestimates an asset’s useful life.

Michael Mauboussin and Dan Callahan, "Capital Allocation: Results, Analysis and Assessment,"Morgan Stanley, December 15, 2022, https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_capitalallocation.pdf

  • Productivity
    • Investment
  • GDP
    • Financial Markets

Laid Off Tech Workers Quickly Find New Jobs

AI Summary. A survey of recently laid-off tech workers found 40% secured new positions within 30 days and 79% within three months, slightly below the 83% three-month re-employment rate for all laid-off workers. The share of tech workers searching longer than six months fell to 5% from 26%, amid 10.3m job openings exceeding the number of unemployed Americans.

Gwynn Guilford Wall Street Journal
Date Posted:
January 5, 2023
Is Database:
Database

@GwynnGuilford 40% of recently laid-off tech workers accepted a new position within 30 days, according to a December 2022 survey, highlighting the resilience of tech employment despite economic challenges.

How quickly do laid-off tech workers find new jobs?

Core argument: A December 2022 survey found 40% of recently laid-off tech workers secured new positions within 30 days, and 79% within three months, slightly below the 83% re-employment rate for all laid-off workers.

In December 2022, a survey revealed that 40% of recently laid-off tech workers secured new positions within 30 days, highlighting the resilience of tech employment despite economic challenges. The survey also showed that 79% of these workers found jobs within three months, slightly below the 83% re-employment rate for all laid-off workers. This rapid reemployment is driven by a tight labor market with 10.3m job openings, exceeding the number of unemployed Americans. Despite layoffs and hiring freezes in tech, demand for skilled tech workers remains high, with many transitioning to roles in other industries such as retail and healthcare. The percentage of tech workers spending over six months job hunting dropped to 5% from 26% earlier, indicating improved job prospects. This trend underscores the ongoing demand for tech skills across various sectors, even as the broader economy faces headwinds from interest rate hikes and inflation.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. A December 2022 survey found 40% of recently laid-off tech workers secured new positions within 30 days, and 79% within three months, slightly below the 83% re-employment rate for all laid-off workers.
  2. The share of laid-off tech workers spending over six months job hunting fell to 5% from 26%, with many moving into roles in other industries such as retail and healthcare.
  3. Reemployment of tech workers came amid a tight labor market with 10.3m job openings exceeding the number of unemployed Americans, even as interest rate hikes and inflation weighed on the broader economy.

According to recent surveys, recently laid-off tech workers are quickly finding new employment with 40% accepting a new position within 30 days.

“…About 79% of workers recently hired after a tech-company layoff or termination landed their new job within three months of starting their search, according to a ZipRecruiter survey of new hires. That was just below the 83% share of all laid-off workers who were re-employed in the same time frame. Nearly four in ten previously laid-off tech workers found jobs less than a month after they began searching, ZipRecruiter found in the survey…”

Sarah Chaney Cambon and Gwynn Guilford, "Laid Off Tech Workers Quickly Find New Jobs,"Wall Street Journal, December 27, 2022, https://www.wsj.com/articles/laid-off-tech-workers-quickly-find-new-jobs-11672097730

Laid Off Tech Workers Quickly Find New Jobs

Most laid off tech workers are finding jobs shortly after beginning their search, a new survey shows, as employers continue to scoop up workers in a tight labor market.

About 79% of workers recently hired after a tech-company layoff or termination landed their new job within three months of starting their search, according to a ZipRecruiter survey of new hires. That was just below the 83% share of all laid-off workers who were re-employed in the same time frame.

Nearly four in 10 previously laid off tech workers found jobs less than a month after they began searching, ZipRecruiter found in the survey.

“Despite the widespread layoffs, hiring freezes, and cost-cutting taking place in tech, many tech workers are finding reemployment remarkably quickly,” said Julia Pollak, chief economist at ZipRecruiter. “They’re still the most sought-after workers with the most in-demand skills.”

Laid Off Tech Workers Quickly Find New Jobs: Extended Excerpt Image 1


Job openings across the economy—at 10.3 million—are down from record highs but far exceed the number of unemployed Americans, providing opportunities for workers who lose their jobs and those who choose to seek another.

Workers previously employed in other industries, including entertainment and leisure, transportation and delivery, and manufacturing, also found new jobs quickly, the ZipRecruiter data showed.

The job market for tech workers is slowing as the broader economy falters under the pressure of Federal Reserve interest rate increases and high inflation. Layoffs and hiring freezes are occurring at startups and large tech companies such as Amazon.com Inc. and Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc. that hired aggressively early on in the pandemic. The cuts are hitting workers in tech jobs—such as software engineers—and other corporate roles including recruiters.

Still, tech firms making cuts are outnumbered by those that are hiring.

A smaller share of tech workers is spending long periods searching for work after a layoff. About 5% of laid off tech workers who found jobs from April to October had spent more than six months hunting for work, down from 26% of those hired between August 2021 and February 2022, ZipRecruiter said.

Wen Huber, age 23, was laid off from a videographer job at a real estate tech startup in late July. Mr. Huber, who lives near Seattle, thought it would take awhile to land a new position, given he didn’t have a four-year-college degree and many other job seekers were flooding the tech job market.

“When I was applying, to be honest, I didn’t feel very confident because there was such an influx of competition with a lot of people also being laid off,” he said.

Mr. Huber had built up a savings buffer, allowing him to be more selective in his job hunt as he sought to pivot into social media. He documented his unemployment experience in a series of videos on LinkedIn. The videos helped him land an interview—and ultimately an offer—for a social media manager job at a software startup, Mr. Huber said. He started in September.

“I was surprised at how quickly I was able to secure an offer for a job,” he said.

Short job searches in tech have become slightly less common as the labor market slows from earlier in the year. Among people who recently lost a job and worked in tech previously, 37% found a new position within one month of starting to look, according to ZipRecruiter. That compared with 50% in February’s survey.

“We’ve definitely seen a slowdown in hiring, but the reason why is that the job creation level was beyond record highs because of the slingshot effect of the pandemic,” said Ryan Sutton, district president at Robert Half, a global recruitment firm. “From August 2020 to May 2022, it wasn’t red-hot. It was lava-hot.”

Usually when mass layoffs hit, there is an influx of tech candidates contacting his company to help with their job search, Mr. Sutton said.

“We have not seen it yet—we haven’t seen more candidates coming to market,” he said. “Our recruiters are having to hunt and hustle just as much as they had to in the last couple of years.”

Client firms in tech also haven’t mentioned any plans to cut jobs, Mr. Sutton said.

About 74% of workers recently hired after losing or leaving a job at a tech company remained in the industry, according to ZipRecruiter. Others who previously worked at tech companies switched to firms in industries such as retail, financial services and healthcare in the six months ending in mid-October.

Pinnacol Assurance, a 650-person workers’ compensation insurer, saw a 46% increase in job candidates from big tech companies including Meta, Microsoft and Twitter between September and mid-December, said Tim Johnson, the company’s chief human resources officer.

The influx of applicants has helped Pinnacol fill tech-related roles such as data scientist, machine-learning engineer and cloud architect in recent months. In mid-December, Pinnacol’s recruiting team made an offer to a job candidate from Google, Mr. Johnson said.

Ayanna Chapman, 42, started a systems-engineering job job at Pinnacol overseeing its computer systems in mid-November after she was laid off from another systems-engineer position this spring.

A generous severance package allowed her to take several months to freshen skills and study for certifications including in the Python programming language. When the Atlanta-area resident began looking for work in the second week of October, recruiters quickly reached out with interview opportunities, she said.

Ms. Chapman was keen on finding a job with stability and thought Pinnacol would fit. She received an offer from the Denver-based company about two weeks after beginning the interview process, much faster than previous experiences, she said.

“I literally cried tears of joy like, ‘Oh, my God, I got the job. I can’t believe it,’” Ms. Chapman said.

Employers broadly are responding to job candidates fast, likely for fear of losing them in a competitive market with a historically low jobless rate of 3.7%. Nine in 10 ZipRecruiter survey respondents said they heard back from a recruiter or hiring manager within a week of applying for a job.

ZipRecruiter’s most recent survey was drawn from 2,550 U.S. residents who had started a new job within the six months ending in mid-October. The data align with other job-market figures that signal the hot labor market is cooling.

Of the ZipRecruiter survey respondents who said they previously worked in tech, most of them likely worked for tech companies regardless of their occupation, Ms. Pollak said. In other words, a recruiter at Amazon would likely be classified as a tech-industry worker in the survey. But a data scientist at Home Depot would be a retail-industry worker.

Laid Off Tech Workers Quickly Find New Jobs: Extended Excerpt Image 2


Separate labor-market figures suggest employers across industries are still seeking to hire tech workers, though less so than earlier in the pandemic. Postings on job-site Indeed for tech occupations are still well above prepandemic levels, but have fallen steeply over the past year.

Software developer job ads on Indeed are down 34% from a year earlier, and ads for mathematics roles—which include data scientists—are 28% lower. Overall postings are down 7.7% from a year ago.

“With tech workers, it’s a much bigger pullback,” said Nick Bunker, an economist at Indeed Hiring Lab. “It’s still above prepandemic levels, but if the current trend keeps up, I don’t imagine that talking point will be true anymore at some point next year.”

The uncertain economic outlook is likely weighing on employers’ appetite for white-collar workers, since they tend to base hiring plans for higher-paid workers on the longer-term business outlook, said Mr. Bunker. By contrast, firms usually gear hiring for waiters, deliverers and other lower-paid jobs according to immediate business needs, he said.

Many companies with among the highest shares of new tech job postings on Indeed in late November were in industries such as consulting, financial services and aerospace.

“For tech jobs, it is still a relatively healthy economic climate and relatively healthy labor market,” said Scott Dobroski, Indeed career expert. “A lot of bright spots for tech workers currently lie outside of traditional tech companies.”

U.S. aerospace companies cut more than 100,000 workers during the pandemic, but have been hiring back at a fast clip and struggling for a year with staffing shortages that have crimped supply chains.

Raytheon Technologies Corp. CEO Greg Hayes said during the summer he was optimistic that layoffs among tech companies would start to ease his own hiring challenges. There are signs that is happening.

“We are starting to see an uptick in interest from the tech layoffs,” said Mike Dippold, chief financial officer of Leonardo DRS Inc., which is based Arlington, Va.

Mr. Dippold said the defense-sensor specialist, like many peers, still had more open positions than it would like, but the staffing situation was starting to improve.

  • Business Cycle
  • GDP
  • Workforce
    • Unemployment/Participation

Friday, January 6, 2023

US Hiring Solid While Wages Cool, Giving Fed Room to Slow Hikes

AI Summary. US nonfarm payrolls rose 223,000, following a 256,000 gain the prior month, while average hourly earnings increased 0.3% on the month and 4.6% from a year earlier. The unemployment rate fell 0.1 percentage point to 3.5%, matching a five-decade low, as labor force participation ticked up to 62.3%.

Reade Pickert Bloomberg
Date Posted:
January 7, 2023

Nonfarm payrolls increased by 223,000 in December and the unemployment rate declined to 3.5%, matching a five-decade low. @Bloomberg

Is hiring staying solid while wage growth cools?

Core argument: U.S. nonfarm payrolls rose 223,000 in December, following a 256,000 gain in November and capping a near-record year for job growth, according to a Labor Department report released Friday.

Nonfarm payrolls increased 223,000 in December, capping a near-record year for job growth, a Labor Department report showed Friday. The advance followed a 256,000 gain in November. Average hourly earnings rose 0.3% from a month earlier and 4.6% from December 2021 after November’s previously eye-popping gain was revised lower. The unemployment rate decreased by 0.1 percentage point to 3.5%, matching a five-decade low, as participation inched higher. The labor force participation rate — the share of the population that is working or looking for work — ticked up to 62.3%, and the rate for workers ages 25-54 rose.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. U.S. nonfarm payrolls rose 223,000 in December, following a 256,000 gain in November and capping a near-record year for job growth, according to a Labor Department report released Friday.
  2. Average hourly earnings rose 0.3% in December and 4.6% from December 2021, after November's previously reported gain was revised lower.
  3. The U.S. unemployment rate fell 0.1 percentage point to 3.5%, matching a five-decade low, as labor force participation ticked up to 62.3% and the rate for workers ages 25-54 rose.
  • Unemployment/Participation

What if Inflation Suddenly Dropped and No One Noticed?

AI Summary. Consumer price index inflation of 7.1% over 12 months reflects a 10.6% annualized rate over the first seven months and 2.5% over the last five, with personal consumption prices showing a similar split. Core inflation excluding food and energy ran higher over the recent five months, at 4.7% and 3.7%.

Alan Blinder Wall Street Journal
Date Posted:
January 7, 2023

Alan Blinder notes that November’s 12-month CPI was 7.1%, however, between June-November 2022 CPI inflation ran at only a 2.5% annualized rate. Blinder concludes, “the inflation future does indeed look brighter than the inflation past.

Alan Blinder notes that November’s 12-month CPI was 7.1%, however, between June-November 2022 CPI inflation ran at only a...

Has inflation already slowed sharply over recent months?

Core argument: CPI inflation of 7.1% over the past 12 months combined a 10.6% annualized rate over the first seven months with just 2.5% over the last five months.

The CPI inflation rate over the past 12 months has been an alarming 7.1%. But the U.S. economy got there by averaging an appalling 10.6% annualized inflation rate over the first seven months and a mere 2.5% over the last five. The PCE price index tells a similar story, though a somewhat less dramatic one. The 5.5% inflation rate over the past 12 months came from a 7.8% rate over the first seven months followed by a 2.4% rate over the last five. If you concentrate instead on “core” inflation, which excludes food and energy prices, annual inflation over the past five months has run higher: a 4.7% annual rate for the CPI and 3.7% for the PCE. So the Fed’s fight against inflation isn’t over.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. CPI inflation of 7.1% over the past 12 months combined a 10.6% annualized rate over the first seven months with just 2.5% over the last five months.
  2. The PCE price index shows a similar pattern, with its 5.5% 12-month rate composed of 7.8% annualized over the first seven months and 2.4% over the last five.
  3. Core inflation excluding food and energy ran higher over the past five months, at a 4.7% annual rate for the CPI and 3.7% for the PCE, leaving the Fed's inflation fight unfinished.
  • Inflation
  • GDP
  • Monetary Policy

Recession Prediction On The Clock

AI Summary. A recession predictor based on the rate of change and acceleration of the smoothed unemployment rate is nearly as accurate as the yield curve slope and more accurate at shorter horizons. The unemployment rate does not currently signal an impending recession, though the same method suggests the business cycle is at a maturing stage when expansions typically end.

Thomas Mertens Federal Reserve Bank Of San Francisco
Date Posted:
January 7, 2023

.@sffed analysis of the jobless unemployment rate finds that it is an effective recession forecaster and that “the jobless rate does not currently signal an impending recession.”

Can unemployment rate momentum predict recessions as well as the yield curve?

Core argument: Plotting the first and second derivatives of the smoothed jobless unemployment rate, with recession months as red dots and expansion months as green, yields a predictor nearly as accurate as the yield curve slope and more accurate at shorter horizons.

[The above chart] plots the change in the smoothed jobless unemployment rate (first derivative) on the horizontal axis and the change in the change (second derivative) on the vertical axis. Recession months are depicted as red dots and expansion months as green dots. This predictor is almost as accurate as the slope of the yield curve but is more accurate at shorter horizons. The jobless rate does not currently signal an impending recession, nor do other macroeconomic time series analyzed using the same methodology. In general, however, examining these series suggests that the business cycle is at a maturing stage when expansions typically come to an end.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Plotting the first and second derivatives of the smoothed jobless unemployment rate, with recession months as red dots and expansion months as green, yields a predictor nearly as accurate as the yield curve slope and more accurate at shorter horizons.
  2. The jobless rate does not signal an impending recession, and neither do other macroeconomic time series analyzed with the same first- and second-derivative methodology.
  3. Examination of these series suggests the business cycle is at a maturing stage at which expansions typically come to an end.
  • Business Cycle
  • GDP

Global Supply Chain Pressure Index: The China Factor

AI Summary. The Global Supply Chain Pressure Index peaked at 4.3 standard deviations above its historical mean before declining substantially toward normal levels. The slowdown in that return to average is attributed partly to worsening supply conditions in China, which have spilled over into its neighboring trade partners.

Ozge Akinci, Gianluca Benigno, Hunter Clark, et al Federal Reserve Bank Of New York
Date Posted:
January 7, 2023

.@NewYorkFed measure of supply chain stress was 1.18 in December, up from .94 in September, as deteriorating conditions in China have led to a pause to improvements.

Are worsening supply conditions in China slowing global supply chain normalization?

Core argument: The Global Supply Chain Pressure Index peaked at 4.3 standard deviations above its historical mean at the end of 2021 before falling to 2.8 by March 2022 and reaching a low of 0.9 in September.

The Global Supply Chain Pressure Index peaked at 4.3 standard deviations above its historical mean at the end of 2021, after which it declined substantially. The initial period of decline saw it drop to 2.8 by March 2022, after which it temporarily increased in April, primarily due to pandemic lockdowns in China and the Russia-Ukraine war. The GSCPI then experienced five consecutive months of declines, reaching a low of 0.9 in September. However, the past three months have witnessed a pause in the reversion to the historical average, with the index increasing by a total of 0.29 points in October and November before declining by 0.05 points last month, leaving the total three-month increase at about a quarter point. We can partly attribute the recent slowdown of the GSCPI’s return to its historical average to worsening supply conditions in China, which have also spilled over into its neighboring trade partners.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. The Global Supply Chain Pressure Index peaked at 4.3 standard deviations above its historical mean at the end of 2021 before falling to 2.8 by March 2022 and reaching a low of 0.9 in September.
  2. After five consecutive monthly declines through September, the GSCPI rose by a combined 0.29 points in October and November and fell 0.05 points in the following month, a net three-month increase of about a quarter point.
  3. The pause in the GSCPI's return to its historical average is partly attributable to worsening supply conditions in China, which have spilled over into its neighboring trade partners.
  • Trade (not deficits)
  • GDP
    • Inflation

Trapped Liquidity

AI Summary. Changes in the financial system's underlying plumbing make it unlikely that the Federal Reserve's balance-sheet runoff can last its expected 2+ years, since an ideal runoff drains system-wide liquidity while keeping bank-sector liquidity above a minimum. Federal Reserve data show US households replaced money market funds as the marginal buyer of short-dated Treasuries, funding purchases from money held in banks.

Joseph Wang Fed Guy Blog
Date Posted:
January 7, 2023

.@FedGuy12 questions the sustainability of the QT regime, noting that American households are the current marginal buyer of short-dated Treasuries. He thinks that this pattern cannot continue without bringing banking reserves to untenable levels.

Can the Fed's balance-sheet runoff last its expected course?

Core argument: Federal Reserve data show U.S. household purchases of Treasuries surged to record levels on a seasonally adjusted annual basis, while money market funds notably shrank their holdings.

A change in the underlying plumbing of the financial system is making it unlikely that QT can run its expected 2+ year course. An ideal QT would drain liquidity in the overall financial system while keeping liquidity in the banking sector above a minimum threshold. The marginal buyer of short-dated Treasuries over 2022 Q3 appears to surprisingly be U.S. households. Federal Reserve data show that household purchases of Treasuries surged to record levels on a seasonally adjusted annual basis as [money market funds] notably shrank their holdings. Households appear to have replaced money market funds as the marginal buyer of bills and are funding their purchases out of funds held in the banking sector.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Federal Reserve data show U.S. household purchases of Treasuries surged to record levels on a seasonally adjusted annual basis, while money market funds notably shrank their holdings.
  2. Households appear to have replaced money market funds as the marginal buyer of short-dated Treasury bills, funding those purchases out of funds held in the banking sector.
  3. A change in the plumbing of the financial system makes it unlikely that quantitative tightening can run its expected 2+ year course, as an ideal QT would drain systemwide liquidity while keeping bank-sector liquidity above a minimum threshold.
  • Financial Markets
  • GDP


Loading More Posts

End of content

No more pages to load

© Copyright 2026 Coherent Research Institute · All Rights Reserved · Privacy · Terms