Edward Conard

Top Ten New York Times Bestselling Author

  • “Unintended Consequences offers deep and well-argued analyses on almost every issue.” - The New York Times
  • “…reminds us that inequality sends a signal of what society lacks most, in America’s case, entrepreneurship and risk taking.” - Lawrence Lindsey, CEO, The Lindsey Group, former Director of the National Economic Council
  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • “…serious thinking for serious thinkers. …a thought-provoking blueprint for growing middle- and working-class incomes.” - Mitt Romney, former Governor of Massachusetts
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “…a very valuable contribution.” - Larry Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury and director of the National Economic Council, president emeritus, Harvard University
  • “…a must-read for serious students of economic policy.” - Glenn Hubbard, Dean, Columbia Business School, and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
  • “…reminds us that inequality sends a signal of what society lacks most, in America’s case, entrepreneurship and risk taking.” - Lawrence Lindsey, CEO, The Lindsey Group, former Director of the National Economic Council
  • “…a comprehensive explanation of the modern economy.” - Julian Robertson, Founder, Tiger Management
  • “…a comprehensive explanation of the modern economy.” - Julian Robertson, Founder, Tiger Management
Upside of Inequality Oxford Unintended Consequences
Buy the Books
  • Macro Roundup
  • About Roundup
  • About Ed Conard
  • Highlights
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
Edward Conard
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • youtube

Macro Roundup

  • Email
  • Text Message (SMS)
  • Twitter/X
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp Message
Subscribe to Macro Roundup Emails
Select topics to choose: articles that mention them (broader) or articles mainly about them (focused)
  • Mentions 0
  • Primary focus 0
Showing all 7,320 Macro Roundup articles
When you search for any topic (like GDP, Inflation, or Banking), choose:
Choose search scope

Monday, September 21, 2020

Do Stocks Outperform Treasury Bills?

AI Summary. Five firms—Exxon Mobil, Apple, Microsoft, General Electric, and IBM—accounted for 10% of total US stock market wealth creation from 1926 to 2016, and just 4% of firms generated all net stock market gains. Most listed firms had lifetime buy-and-hold returns below those of one-month Treasury bills.

Hendrik Bessembinder Journal of Financial Economics
Date Posted:
September 21, 2020
Is Database:
Database
Is Important:
Important

According to @HendrikBessembinder, 5 firms account for 10% of wealth creation btw 1926-2016, while 4% of firms account for all net stock market gains over the period.

Do most stocks outperform Treasury bills?

Core argument: Only 4% of listed firms accounted for all net stock market gains from 1926 to 2016, while most listed firms delivered lifetime buy-and-hold returns below those of one-month Treasury bills.

The analysis reveals a striking concentration of wealth creation in the stock market, with just five firms—Exxon Mobil, Apple, Microsoft, General Electric, and IBM—accounting for 10% of total wealth creation from 1926 to 2016. Furthermore, only 4% of firms were responsible for all net stock market gains during this period, highlighting a significant skewness in returns. This suggests that while stocks can outperform Treasury bills, the majority of listed firms have lifetime buy-and-hold returns that are less than one-month Treasuries. The data underscores the importance of selecting the right stocks for substantial returns, as a small fraction of firms drive the majority of market gains.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Only 4% of listed firms accounted for all net stock market gains from 1926 to 2016, while most listed firms delivered lifetime buy-and-hold returns below those of one-month Treasury bills.
  2. Five firms—Exxon Mobil, Apple, Microsoft, General Electric, and IBM—accounted for 10% of total stock market wealth creation from 1926 to 2016.

Hendrik Bessembinder,"Do Stocks Outperform Treasury Bills?" June 3, 2018, Journal of Financial Economics, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm

The paper finds the majority of listed firms have lifetime buy and hold returns of less than one-month Treasuries:

Great new paper finds a shocking high degree of skewness in returns. As of December 2016 5 individual firms accounted for 10% of wealth creation btw 1926-2016, Apple and Microsoft were two of them and another two Exxon and GE seem like they are in death rolls now: “…However, just five firms (Exxon Mobile, Apple, Microsoft, General Electric, and International Business Machines) account for 10% of the total wealth creation…”

Steve Comment: See table“Panel A of Table 2A reports summary statistics for the pooled distribution of 3,575,216 monthly common stock returns contained in theCRSP database from July 1926 to December 2016, as well as matched Treasury bill returns. The data confirm that the mean excess return is positive, as the average monthly return is 1.13%, compared toan average one-month Treasury bill return during the same month of 0.37%..”

Ed Comment::Speaking loosely 1:25 account for all the gain (since the one-month treasury is effectively inflation please zero return. What is the 1-month treasury return bench march he is using over the period?) 1:300 account for all the excess profits. And these are the companies that made it public!!! For every one of those, there are probably many that failed long before.

"....Themajority of common stocks that have appeared in the Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP) database since 1926 have lifetime buy-and-hold returns less than one-month Treasuries. When stated in terms of lifetime dollar wealth creation, the best-performing 4% of listed companies explain the net gain for the entire US stock market since 1926,as other stocks collectively matched Treasury bills.....Of all monthly common stock returns contained in the CRSP database from 1926 to 2016, only 47.8% are larger than the one-month Treasury rate in the same month. In fact, less than half of monthly CRSP common stock returns are positive. When focusing on stocks’ full lifetimes (from the beginning of the sample in 1926, or first appearance in CRSP, through the 2016 end of the sample, or delisting from CRSP), just 42.6% of common stocks, slightly less than three out of seven, have a buy-and-hold return (inclusive of reinvested dividends) that exceeds the return to holding one-month Treasury bills over the matched horizon. More than half of CRSP common stocks deliver negative lifetime returns. The single most frequent outcome (when returns are rounded to the nearest 5%) observed for individual common stocks over their full lifetimes is a loss of 100%.....Rates of underperformance are highest for small capitalization stocks and, as would be anticipated based on the evidence in Fama and French (2004), for stocks that have entered the database in recent decades.... approximately 25,300 companies that issued stocks appearing in the CRSP common stock database since 1926 are collectively responsible for lifetime shareholder wealth creation of nearly $35 trillion, measured as of December 2016. However, just five firms (Exxon Mobile, Apple, Microsoft, General Electric, and International Business Machines) account for 10% of the total wealth creation. The 90 topperforming companies, slightly more than one-third of 1% of the companies that have listed common stock, collectively account for over half of the wealth creation. The 1,092 topperforming companies, slightly more than 4% of the total, account for all of the net wealth creation. That is, the remaining 96% of companies whose common stock has appeared in the CRSP data collectively generate lifetime dollar gains that matched gains on one-month Treasury bills.... When stated in terms of lifetime dollar wealth creation to shareholders in aggregate, approximately one-third of 1% of the firms that issued common stocks contained in the CRSP database account for half of the net stock market gains, and slightly more than 4% of the firms account for all of the net stock market gains...."

  • Financial Markets
  • Comparisons
    • Historical

Wednesday, September 23, 2020

Median Household Income By Age & Birth Cohort

AI Summary. Data on median household income by age and birth cohort show each generation earning more than prior generations did at the same age, contradicting claims that millennials earn 20% less than baby boomers at comparable life stages.

Ernie Redeschi @ernietedeschi
Date Posted:
September 23, 2020
Is Database:
Database

Analysis of median household income by age & birth cohort reveals each generation is experiencing higher income levels than previous generations at the same age, contradicting claims that millennials earn 20% less than boomers.

Does each generation earn more than earlier ones at the same age?

Core argument: Median household income by age and birth cohort shows each generation reaching higher income levels than prior generations at the same age, contradicting claims that millennials earn 20% less than boomers at similar life stages.

Analysis of median household income by age and birth cohort reveals that each generation is experiencing higher income levels than previous generations at the same age. This trend contradicts claims that millennials earn 20% less than their boomer counterparts at similar life stages. The data suggests a positive trajectory in income growth across generations, indicating potential shifts in economic power and consumption patterns. Such insights are crucial for economists and policymakers as they assess the long-term implications on economic stability, social mobility, and fiscal policy. Understanding these dynamics can aid in crafting strategies to address income inequality and support sustainable economic development.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Median household income by age and birth cohort shows each generation reaching higher income levels than prior generations at the same age, contradicting claims that millennials earn 20% less than boomers at similar life stages.

Good chart from Ernie, household income by generations.

His analysis shows each generation is seeing higher income than prior generations at the same age. Note this is at odds with the claim inOkay Boomerthat millennials earn on average 20% less then their boomer peers at same point in lifecycle.

Ernie Redeschi, “Median Household Income By Age & Birth Cohort,” @ernietedeschi, September 23, 2020, https://twitter.com/ernietedeschi/status/1308748407633309696

  • Demographics
  • Comparisons
    • Age
  • Workforce
    • Wages/Income


Loading More Posts

End of content

No more pages to load

© Copyright 2026 Coherent Research Institute · All Rights Reserved · Privacy · Terms