Does a shortage of talented labor explain negative interest rates?
Core argument: The "genius' share" of income rose from 6.7% in 1984 to 31.4% in 2006, which the author cites as evidence of talent's growing importance in economic outcomes.
The scarcity of talented labor may be a key factor driving negative interest rates, as the imbalance between mobilizing human and non-human resources impacts returns. With the number of publicly traded companies in the U.S. shrinking, investors face limited options, leading them to seek less correlated equity investments like venture capital. However, only about 20% of funded projects succeed, highlighting the challenge of finding talent. If more talent were available, venture capital returns could increase by 50%, prompting capital to shift from negative yield securities to new ventures. This would likely push government securities' yields into positive territory to attract funds. The U.S., with its developed venture capital markets, has not yet experienced negative yields, underscoring the structural forces at play. The "genius' share" of income rose from 6.7% in 1984 to 31.4% in 2006, reflecting the growing importance of talent in economic outcomes.




