AI Summary. A survey finds more than half of young men gamble, with 23% doing so daily, and 43% watch pornography daily or several times a week. 42% say the statement "I am inclined to think that I am a failure" describes them very or somewhat well, a view more common among daily gamblers (66%) and daily pornography viewers (63%).

Date Posted:
Is Database:
Database
Is Important:
Important

An ISF survey of 2,000 American men aged 18–29 found 23% reported gambling daily and 27% watch pornography daily. 66% of the men who gambled daily reported feeling like a failure, as well as 63% of the men who watch pornography daily.

Do daily gambling and pornography use correlate with young men's self-perceived failure?

Core argument: More than half of young men surveyed gamble, with 23% gambling daily, 12% more than several times a week, and 21% at least some of the time.

More than half of young men in our survey are now gamblers. Nearly 1 in 4 (23%) report that they gamble daily, plus 12% doing so more than several times a week, and a further 21% at least some of the time. 43% of young men say they watch pornography daily (27%) or several times a week (16%), with another 26% about weekly or less. More than 4 in 10 young men (42%) believe that the statement “all in all, I am inclined to think that I am a failure” describes them “very well” (15%) or “somewhat well” (27%). Those who view pornography (63%) and gamble (66%) every day—along with day trading and playing fantasy sports—are significantly more inclined to see themselves as a failure.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. More than half of young men surveyed gamble, with 23% gambling daily, 12% more than several times a week, and 21% at least some of the time.
  2. 43% of young men report watching pornography daily (27%) or several times a week (16%), and daily pornography viewers (63%) and daily gamblers (66%) are significantly more inclined to see themselves as failures.

AI Summary. The share of U.S. 12th graders who say they will likely get married someday fell to 67% in 2023 from 80% in 1993, a decline the Pew Research Center attributes to shifting views among girls. Boys are now more likely than girls to say they want to marry (74% vs. 61%), reversing the 1993 pattern.

Date Posted:
Is Database:
Database
Is Important:
Important

Btw 1993 and 2023, the share of American female high school seniors who reported wanting to get married “someday” fell from 83% to 61%. Their male counterparts saw just a 2pp decline to 74%.

Are high school girls now less likely than boys to want marriage?

Core argument: 67% of U.S. 12th graders said in 2023 that they will likely choose to get married someday, down from 80% in 1993, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of University of Michigan survey data.

U.S. high schoolers are less likely now than in the past to say they want to get married someday. And a smaller share today say that they’re very likely to have children if they do get married, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of survey data from the University of Michigan. As of 2023, 67% of the nation’s 12th graders say they’ll likely choose to get married someday, down from 80% in 1993. The drop in the share of 12th graders who say they want to get married reflects shifting views among girls. Boys are more likely than girls to say they want to get married someday (74% vs. 61%), but this wasn’t always the case. In 1993, a larger share of girls (83%) than boys (76%) said they wanted to get married.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. 67% of U.S. 12th graders said in 2023 that they will likely choose to get married someday, down from 80% in 1993, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of University of Michigan survey data.
  2. Boys in 12th grade are more likely than girls to say they want to marry someday (74% vs. 61%), a reversal from 1993, when 83% of girls and 76% of boys said so.
  3. Pew finds that the decline in 12th graders' stated desire to marry reflects shifting views among girls, and that a smaller share today say they are very likely to have children if they do marry.

AI Summary. In a randomized trial, parents receiving $1,000 per month in unconditional cash for three years spent more on their children monthly and reported better parenting behaviors, such as closer supervision, than parents receiving $50 per month. The transfer had no meaningful effect on most educational outcomes, the home environment, child food security, homelessness, or parental satisfaction.

Date Posted:
Is Database:
Database
Is Important:
Important

A randomized experiment giving 1,000 parents an unconditional $1K/month over 3 years found essentially no differences in family outcomes; treated children showed no significant gains in well-being or education.

Do unconditional cash transfers improve children's outcomes?

Core argument: Parents randomly assigned a $1,000 per month unconditional cash transfer for three years spent more on their children monthly and reported better parenting behaviors, such as closer supervision, than parents receiving $50 per month.

Parents who were randomly selected to receive a $1,000 per month unconditional cash transfer for three years spent more on their children each month and reported better parenting behaviors (such as supervising their children more closely) compared to those randomized to receive $50 per month. The transfer did not have a meaningful effect on most educational outcomes measured in school administrative records, nor did it affect characteristics of the home environment, child food security, exposure to homelessness, or parental satisfaction. Figure A3 shows no significant effect of the transfer on the home environment overall in any year, nor on the probability a child is unhoused. It appears that child food insecurity is [actually] significantly worse for transfer recipients in the third year of the transfer and close to zero in the first two years, [though] this third year effect on child food security does not remain significant after adjusting inference for False Discovery Rates due to repeated testing. Among adult participants, food security improves significantly as a result of the transfer in the first year but worsens over time. Treated families were more likely to move, [but] we did not detect changes in most measures of neighborhood quality,

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Parents randomly assigned a $1,000 per month unconditional cash transfer for three years spent more on their children monthly and reported better parenting behaviors, such as closer supervision, than parents receiving $50 per month.
  2. The $1,000 monthly transfer had no meaningful effect on most educational outcomes in school administrative records, nor on the home environment, child food security, exposure to homelessness, or parental satisfaction.
  3. Adult food security improved significantly in the first year of the transfer but worsened over time, and child food insecurity was significantly worse for recipients in year three, a result that does not survive False Discovery Rate adjustment.

AI Summary. Survey research estimates that an additional 13.3 million American adults were single by 2022 compared with before the Covid-19 pandemic, with informal relationships dissolving while married and cohabitating couples largely remained intact. The share of single, non-dating adults was higher in 2022 than in 2020, when in-person dating was dangerous.

Date Posted:
Is Database:
Database
Is Important:
Important

Stanford sociologist Michael Rosenfeld finds that declining social connections during COVID led to 13.3mm more single Americans in 2022 vs. pre-pandemic, delaying traditional adult milestones like getting married, having children, or buying a home.

Did the pandemic leave millions more American adults single and not dating?

Core argument: Stanford sociologist Michael Rosenfeld estimates an extra 13.3 million Americans were single by 2022 compared with before the pandemic, a dating disruption encompassing more than 1 in 20 US adults.

When Covid-19 hit, Stanford sociology professor Michael Rosenfeld reran a survey he had conducted in 2017 to measure those more casual [social] ties. The exercise revealed that millions of informal relationships fell apart, even as married and cohabitating couples survived the pandemic largely intact. More disturbing than the size of this dating disruption—encompassing more than 1 out of every 20 US adults—was the timing. After the number of singles surged in 2020, when in-person dating was dangerous, Rosenfeld ran the survey again in 2022 and was surprised to find that even more people were alone and not dating. Compared with before the pandemic, he estimates an extra 13.3 million Americans were single by 2022. A longer-term consequence of the “dating recession,” Rosenfeld says, is that Americans continue to delay traditional adult milestones. Since the 1980s, the shares of those who live on their own, get married, have children, or buy a home by age 30 have been dropping steadily.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Stanford sociologist Michael Rosenfeld estimates an extra 13.3 million Americans were single by 2022 compared with before the pandemic, a dating disruption encompassing more than 1 in 20 US adults.
  2. Rosenfeld's surveys found the number of singles surged in 2020, when in-person dating was dangerous, and his 2022 rerun showed even more people alone and not dating.
  3. Rosenfeld's survey work indicates informal relationships fell apart during Covid-19 while married and cohabitating couples survived largely intact, and he says a longer-term consequence of the "dating recession" is continued delay of traditional adult milestones.