AI Summary. 30% of US adults have literacy skills typical of a 10-year-old, yet US workers scoring at that low level earn an average of nearly $30 an hour and two-thirds are employed, compared with about $20 and fewer than half employed in Britain. The author argues this reflects stronger economic growth rather than vocational education policy.

Date Posted:
Is Database:
Database
Is Important:
Important

Using OECD skills data and the Luxembourg Income Study, Burn-Murdoch finds US workers at the lowest levels of literacy and numeracy earn ~ on par with British workers scoring a 2, ~ a mean score.

Does economic growth matter more than education policy for low-skilled workers' pay?

Core argument: 30% of US adults have literacy skills typical of a 10-year-old, yet US workers scoring that low earn an average of almost $30 per hour and two-thirds of them are employed.

30% of US adults have literacy skills typical of a 10-year-old. The same proportion of US workers who score stunningly low on literacy earn an average of almost $30 per hour, and two-thirds of them are in work. Their British counterparts make the equivalent of $20 and fewer than half are employed. This all looks more like the fruits of years of stronger growth than vocational education policy. We should view education as creating potential that a strong economy unleashes (and a weak one disappoints).

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. 30% of US adults have literacy skills typical of a 10-year-old, yet US workers scoring that low earn an average of almost $30 per hour and two-thirds of them are employed.
  2. British workers with similarly low literacy scores earn the equivalent of $20 per hour and fewer than half are employed, a gap the author attributes to years of stronger US growth rather than vocational education policy.
  3. The author argues that education should be viewed as creating potential that a strong economy unleashes and a weak one disappoints.

AI Summary. A study of China's imperial civil service examination estimates that both exam performance and ties to powerful examiners had larger effects on career outcomes for high-performing candidates, indicating merit and networks were complements rather than substitutes. The authors argue this complementarity makes the influence of networks harder to distinguish from merit.

Date Posted:
Is Database:
Database

From 1644–1905, Qing China staffed its bureaucracy through exams and patronage. Only 12.6% of exam graduates reached top office, but patronage favored stronger performers, illustrating how merit and connections can be complements rather than substitutes.

Do merit and connections reinforce each other in civil service careers?

Core argument: In China's imperial examination system, exam performance mattered more for candidates in the high-performing category, consistent with an institutional design that steered that elite group toward more prestigious careers.

Figure 5 studies the interplay between merit and networks by estimating the effects of exam performance and ties to powerful examiners separately for the high- and low-performing categories. The left panel shows the effects of exam performance for the two categories, while the right panel presents those of examiner power. Two patterns stand out. First, exam performance matters more for the high category, consistent with the institutional design that steered this elite group toward more prestigious careers. Second, ties to powerful examiners are also more valuable for the high category, pointing to a complementarity between merit and networks. To understand the implications of our finding on complementarity, it is useful to contrast it with the counterfactual of substitution. When merit and networks are complements (rather than substitutes), those who attained top office tend to exhibit both stronger exam performance and stronger connections. By contrast, under substitution, strong networks would compensate for weaker exam performance, and vice versa. Complementarity implies [a higher degree of meritocracy than substitution, as] successful candidates appear to have had better performance. Second, complementarity makes it harder to identify the influence of networks: their effects can operate under the guise of merit rather than as a visible substitute for it.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. In China's imperial examination system, exam performance mattered more for candidates in the high-performing category, consistent with an institutional design that steered that elite group toward more prestigious careers.
  2. Ties to powerful examiners were also more valuable for the high-performing category, pointing to complementarity between merit and networks rather than substitution.
  3. Complementarity implies a higher degree of meritocracy than substitution, since those attaining top office tended to show both stronger exam performance and stronger connections, and it makes the influence of networks harder to identify because it can operate under the guise of merit.

AI Summary. Black and Hispanic students make up about 62% of New York City public school enrollment but about 10% of the incoming freshman class at the city's eight most prestigious high schools, where roughly 80% of seats went to Asian and white students. Asian students are about 19% of public school enrollment and received 57% of specialized-school offers.

Date Posted:

62% of New York City public school students are black or Hispanic, and 19% are Asian. Stuyvesant, an elite public school, offered admission to 777 students. Three offers went to black students, and 21 to Hispanics; 69% went to Asian students.

How do admissions at elite public high schools compare with district enrollment?

Core argument: Stuyvesant High School made 3 of its 777 admissions offers to Black students and 21 to Hispanic students, together a nearly one-third decline from the previous freshman class.

About 62% of the students in the city’s public schools are Black or Hispanic. At [NYC] eight most prestigious high schools, about 10% of the students in the incoming freshman class are expected to be Black or Hispanic, roughly the same as last year. About 80% of the seats went to Asian and white students. At Stuyvesant High School in Manhattan, often considered the most selective of the city’s specialized high schools, three of the 777 offers were made to Black students, and 21 were for Hispanic students, together representing a nearly one-third decline from the previous freshman class. About 19% of all public school students are Asian, but they received 57% of the offers for the specialized schools for the fall. The rates were higher at some schools, including 69% at Stuyvesant and 78% at Queens High School for the Sciences at York College.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Stuyvesant High School made 3 of its 777 admissions offers to Black students and 21 to Hispanic students, together a nearly one-third decline from the previous freshman class.
  2. Black and Hispanic students make up about 62% of New York City public school enrollment but about 10% of the incoming freshman class at the city's eight most prestigious high schools, roughly unchanged from last year.
  3. Asian students account for about 19% of New York City public school students but received 57% of specialized high school offers for the fall, including 69% at Stuyvesant and 78% at Queens High School for the Sciences at York College.

AI Summary. Chinese state-owned enterprises are advertising party-building and propaganda posts requiring Communist Party membership and political and theoretical grounding, with average pay of about Rmb110,000 ($16,200) a year, below the Rmb124,000 average for non-private employers. Such roles offer job security and benefits exceeding those in the private sector, appealing to graduates facing youth unemployment.

Date Posted:

Elite Chinese universities (Peking, Renmin, Tsinghua) now offer “party building” courses (Mao through Xi) to give graduates a job edge as youth unemployment climbs. Party loyalty is a hireable credential. CCP cells number 5.25mn, with 30% inside state/private firms.

Are ideological credentials becoming a career advantage for Chinese graduates?

Core argument: Party-building roles in China pay an average Rmb110,000 ($16,200) a year according to job site Zhiyouji, below the Rmb124,000 average for non-private entities, but offer job security and generous benefits relative to the private sector.

Still for China's young graduates, who are grappling with rising youth unemployment, party building could lead to a stable, if not especially lucrative, income. A job posting on recruitment site Yingjiesheng for a "Party building and propaganda officer" at a Tianjin-based engineering state-owned enterprise demanded that applicants be CCP members with "good political literacy and theoretical grounding." According to job site Zhiyouji, the average annual salary for such a role is Rmb110,000 ($16,200), trending below the national average of Rmb124,000 for non-private entities. However, such roles offer job security and generous benefits compared with the private sector.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Party-building roles in China pay an average Rmb110,000 ($16,200) a year according to job site Zhiyouji, below the Rmb124,000 average for non-private entities, but offer job security and generous benefits relative to the private sector.
  2. A Tianjin-based state-owned engineering enterprise advertised a "Party building and propaganda officer" post on recruitment site Yingjiesheng requiring applicants to be CCP members with "good political literacy and theoretical grounding.".
  3. China's young graduates, contending with rising youth unemployment, are turning to party-building work for a stable if not especially lucrative income.

AI Summary. Undergraduate enrollment in degrees tied to the most AI-exposed jobs has risen 8%, indicating students are moving toward rather than away from fields exposed to artificial intelligence. A decline in computer science degrees is more than offset by growth in other exposed fields such as engineering.

Date Posted:

Far from shying away from AI, American undergraduates “are flocking towards the most-AI-exposed degrees,” with enrollment in these majors up 8% last year compared to 2017.

Are students moving toward or away from degrees exposed to AI?

Core argument: Undergraduate enrollment in the most-AI-exposed degrees rose 8% last year compared with 2017, indicating students are moving toward fields whose likely jobs have greater AI exposure.

Are students shying away from fields that have more exposure to AI, perhaps worried that AI will shrink the number of jobs available to them? Or are students shifting towards those fields, preparing for a future in which they will have to be comfortable using AI? To find out, we can check enrollment for groups of degrees based on the AI exposure of the jobs that students with those degrees are likely to take, as shown in Figure 1. As is clear, undergraduates are flocking towards the most-AI-exposed degrees, with enrollment in those degrees up 8% last year compared to 2017. This trend holds despite a notable decline in Computer Science degrees, one of the most-AI-exposed degrees, but whose decline is more than offset by increases in other exposed degrees like Engineering.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Undergraduate enrollment in the most-AI-exposed degrees rose 8% last year compared with 2017, indicating students are moving toward fields whose likely jobs have greater AI exposure.
  2. Computer Science, one of the most-AI-exposed degrees, saw a notable enrollment decline that was more than offset by increases in other exposed fields such as Engineering.
  3. Grouping degrees by the AI exposure of the jobs their graduates are likely to take offers a way to test whether students are avoiding or embracing AI-exposed fields.

AI Summary. A meta-study of 79 causal estimates finds an average 8.2% earnings gain per year of education, matching earlier work, but also finds evidence of publication bias favoring statistically significant and positive estimates. Correcting for these biases implies an average causal return in the 0%–3% range.

Date Posted:
Is Database:
Database
Is Important:
Important

Clark and Nielsen replicate the ~8% estimates of the return to education obtained by standard methods, but find evidence of selection biases in favor of high estimated returns. After correcting for these biases, they calculate returns on the order of 3%.

Do publication biases inflate estimated earnings returns to education?

Core argument: A meta-study of 79 causal estimates of education's effect on earnings, drawn from school-leaving age mandates and child labor bans, reports an 8.2% earnings gain per year of education, similar to the earlier Ashenfelter et al. study.

In this meta-study of 79 estimates of the causal effects of education on earnings (derived from increases of the mandated school-leaving age or legislation banning child labor under certain ages), we report a similar effect to [the classic] earlier study (Ashenfelter, et al): an 8.2% gain in earnings for each year of education. We also find clear evidence of significant publication biases. Studies passing the filter of publication were more likely to have coefficients statistically significantly greater than 0, and we observe strong evidence that studies with returns estimated at less than 0 were more difficult to publish. There is strong suggestive evidence of the first publication bias in the data. Figure 6 shows that the average estimated return rises substantially where the standard error is larger. This suggests a greater likelihood of an estimate being published when it was statistically significantly different from 0. If all estimates were published independent of the estimated return, we would not expect there to be such a gradient. Correcting the first publication bias by looking at the average return on the studies with the lowest standard errors would suggest an average causal return to education of no more than 3%, compared to the reported 8.2%. Independent of this, correcting for the omission of returns less than 0 implies an overall causal return to education only in the 0%–3% range.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. A meta-study of 79 causal estimates of education's effect on earnings, drawn from school-leaving age mandates and child labor bans, reports an 8.2% earnings gain per year of education, similar to the earlier Ashenfelter et al. study.
  2. Average estimated returns to education rise substantially where standard errors are larger, which suggests estimates were more likely to be published when statistically significantly different from 0.
  3. Correcting for publication bias by using the studies with the lowest standard errors would suggest an average causal return to education of no more than 3%, while correcting for omitted negative estimates implies a 0%–3% range.

AI Summary. Students admitted to elite high schools just above the admissions cutoff are estimated to be 3.2pp less likely to have ever held a formal private-sector job five years later — a 16% decline versus those just missing the cutoff — and to earn 5.3% lower wages. These gaps shrink over time and are statistically insignificant after 15 years.

Date Posted:
Is Database:
Database

In data from the Mexico City metro area over 2003–2009, students who just missed the exam score cutoff for admission to an elite high school have 5.3% higher wages after five years (2.5% after 10 years) than marginally admitted students.

Does barely getting into an elite high school lower early earnings?

Core argument: Marginal assignment to an elite high school causes a 3.2pp decline in the probability of ever having held a formal job five years later at ages 19–20, a 16% drop from the 20% base rate for students just below the cutoff.

[We] trace out the [harmful] causal impact of [marginal] assignment to an elite school [as opposed to just missing the admissions cutoff] on formal private labor market outcomes over time. Five years after the assignment process (at ages 19-20, beyond high school age), elite assignment [based on a test score marginally above the cutoff] causes a 3.2pp decline in the probability of ever having held a formal job. This is a 16% decline relative to the base rate of 20% for students missing the elite cutoff by one point. Over time, this elite disadvantage declines: after 10 years (at ages 24-25, after the typical age of college graduation), the effect is -2.1pp, while after 15 years (at ages 29-30) the estimated -0.2pp impact is statistically insignificant. While the negative effect on formal employment eventually fades, it leaves elite students with a deficit in formal labor market experience. After 5 years, elite assignment reduces the cumulative number of months with a formal job by 14%. Conditional on formal employment, marginal elite assignment causes a reduction in wages that fades out over time. Five years after assignment, elite assignment reduces wages by 5.3%. This reduction declines to 2.6% after 10 years, and [essentially vanishes] after 15 years.

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. Marginal assignment to an elite high school causes a 3.2pp decline in the probability of ever having held a formal job five years later at ages 19–20, a 16% drop from the 20% base rate for students just below the cutoff.
  2. The elite-assignment employment disadvantage fades over time, falling to -2.1pp after 10 years (ages 24–25) and a statistically insignificant -0.2pp after 15 years (ages 29–30).
  3. Conditional on formal employment, marginal elite assignment reduces wages by 5.3% after five years and 2.6% after 10 years, and cuts cumulative months of formal work by 14% after five years.

AI Summary. A falling US birth rate is projected to shrink the pool of college-age Americans, leaving schools with empty classrooms. Many smaller, lesser-known colleges are already firing professors, cutting liberal arts courses in favor of science and technology programs, or closing entirely.

Date Posted:
Is Database:
Database

As America’s demographics roll over, smaller public and private liberal arts colleges have “already hit the precipice.” Btw 2003 and 2024, more than 100 public campuses closed, and ~ 2/3 of private for-profit colleges have shut down since the 2010s.

How is a falling birth rate reshaping American colleges?

Core argument: The US pool of college-aged Americans is expected to shrink after 2025, pushing schools toward a "demographic cliff" in which a steadily dropping population of people in their late teens and early 20s leaves desks and classrooms empty.

The country’s tumbling birth rate is pushing schools toward a “demographic cliff,” where a steadily dropping population of people in their late teens and early 20s will leave desks and classrooms empty. Many smaller, lesser-known schools have already hit the precipice. They’re firing professors, paring back liberal arts courses in favor of STEM — or closing altogether. Others will likely reach the cliff in the next few years. Although it has plunged since the 1950s, the US birth rate ticked upward slightly before the 2008 financial crisis, and that brief demographic boost has kept enrollment at larger schools afloat. But the nationwide pool of college-aged Americans is expected to shrink after 2025. The financial pressure will be relentless. “If colleges were facing a stark decline in one or two cohorts, higher ed could likely say, ‘Well, we could admit a few additional students and tighten our belts to muddle through,’” said Nathan Grawe, an economics professor at Carleton College in Minnesota, who has written books about education and demographics. “But it’s one year after another of contraction, of ratcheting up the pressure.”

Takeaways by Macro Roundup® AI

  1. The US pool of college-aged Americans is expected to shrink after 2025, pushing schools toward a "demographic cliff" in which a steadily dropping population of people in their late teens and early 20s leaves desks and classrooms empty.
  2. Many smaller, lesser-known US colleges have already reached the precipice, firing professors, paring back liberal arts courses in favor of STEM, or closing altogether, with others likely to reach it in the next few years.
  3. Carleton College economics professor Nathan Grawe argues that higher education could muddle through a decline in one or two cohorts by admitting a few additional students and tightening belts, but faces one year after another of contraction.