Edward Conard

Top Ten New York Times Bestselling Author

  • “Unintended Consequences offers deep and well-argued analyses on almost every issue.” - The New York Times
  • “…serious thinking for serious thinkers. …a thought-provoking blueprint for growing middle- and working-class incomes.” - Mitt Romney, former Governor of Massachusetts
  • “A full-throated defense of economic dynamism.” - The Wall Street Journal
  • “…a must-read for serious students of economic policy.” - Glenn Hubbard, Dean, Columbia Business School, and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
  • “Unintended Consequences provides a provocative interpretation of the causes of the global financial crisis and the policies needed to return to rapid growth. Whether you agree or not, this analysis is well worth reading.” - Nouriel Roubini, New York University; Chairman, Roubini Global Economics
  • “Unintended Consequences should be read by anyone who takes for granted the superiority of progressive taxation and has not thought carefully about the trade-offs involved.” - The New Republic
  • “…a very valuable contribution.” - Larry Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury and director of the National Economic Council, president emeritus, Harvard University
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • “…a comprehensive explanation of the modern economy.” - Julian Robertson, Founder, Tiger Management
  • “…a comprehensive explanation of the modern economy.” - Julian Robertson, Founder, Tiger Management
Upside of Inequality Oxford Unintended Consequences
Buy the Books
  • Macro Roundup
  • About Roundup
  • About Ed Conard
  • Highlights
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
Edward Conard
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • youtube

Robust Private Placement Market Defeats Argument that Stock Buybacks Don’t Fund Investment

The WSJ provides evidence that private placements are large enough to support Justin Wolfers (on the left) and John Cochrane’s (on the right) argument that stock buybacks are not an indication that low corporate taxes are not motivating increased investment. Stock buybacks fund private placements.

“An analysis by The Wall Street Journal found [private capital markets] have more than doubled in size over the past decade, surpassing the growth of public stocks and bonds available to all investors. … At least $2.4 trillion was raised privately in the U.S. last year. That widened a gap that emerged in 2011 with the public markets, which raised $2.1 trillion, according to the Journal’s analysis of tens of thousands of securities filings and data provider Dealogic.

‘[Private placements are] fueling entrepreneurship,’ because ‘companies have lots of options to access capital,’ said Jacqueline Kelley, head of the Americas IPO Markets practice at accounting firm Ernst & Young LLC. …  The number of U.S. unicorns tripled over four years, to 105 in February from 31 in 2014, according to a Journal tracker. … The fast-growing market has made it easier for smaller and medium-size companies to get loans.”

Robust Private Placement Market Defeats Argument that Stock Buybacks Don’t Fund Investment

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
© Copyright 2026 Coherent Research Institute · All Rights Reserved · Privacy · Terms