Edward Conard

Top Ten New York Times Bestselling Author

  • “…serious thinking for serious thinkers. …a thought-provoking blueprint for growing middle- and working-class incomes.” - Mitt Romney, former Governor of Massachusetts
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “Unintended Consequences offers deep and well-argued analyses on almost every issue.” - The New York Times
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “Unintended Consequences is far smarter and more thought-provoking than most economics written for the general public” - Greg Mankiw, Harvard University, Former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors
  • “…a comprehensive explanation of the modern economy.” - Julian Robertson, Founder, Tiger Management
  • “Unintended Consequences represents the most cogent and persuasive analysis of the Financial Crisis to date.” - Andrei Shleifer, 1999 John Bates Clark Medal Winner
  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • “Unintended Consequences should be read by anyone who takes for granted the superiority of progressive taxation and has not thought carefully about the trade-offs involved.” - The New Republic
  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • “…a comprehensive explanation of the modern economy.” - Julian Robertson, Founder, Tiger Management
  • “Unintended Consequences is full of substance, it is one of the must-read books of the year, and once I finish it I will be giving it a second read through right away.” - Tyler Cowen, Professor, George Mason University
Upside of Inequality Oxford Unintended Consequences
Buy the Books
  • Macro Roundup
  • About Roundup
  • About Ed Conard
  • Highlights
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
Edward Conard
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • youtube

Public School Improvement Programs Not as Effective as They Seem

According to AEI scholar Nat Malkus, evidence from a new District of Columbia Public Schools report indicates public school improvement programs may not be as effective as they seem.

A third of DCPS 2017 graduates received diplomas in violation of district policy:

15% received credits through “credit-recovery” — abridged, easier-to-pass make-up classes for students who failed a course—even though the graduates never took the original required courses

1 in 5 [students] had excessive absences, with 1 in 10 missing at least half the school year

DCPS’ absence problems progressively worsened over at least 3 years

Suspicious late grade changes, typically altering failing grades to passing, were another issue; there were over 4,000 in one school

A 2017 Washington Teachers Union survey found that 6 in 10 DCPS high-school teachers reported school leaders “pressured” them into passing failing students, and 55% believed their school’s graduation rate was inaccurate.

Malkus also reports:

New York City liberally used credit-recovery courses to push its graduation rate up 24 points from 2005 to 2015.

Los Angeles used them to raise its projected graduation rate from 52% to 82% in just three months.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
© Copyright 2026 Coherent Research Institute · All Rights Reserved · Privacy · Terms