Edward Conard

Top Ten New York Times Bestselling Author

  • “…reminds us that inequality sends a signal of what society lacks most, in America’s case, entrepreneurship and risk taking.” - Lawrence Lindsey, CEO, The Lindsey Group, former Director of the National Economic Council
  • “…a must-read for serious students of economic policy.” - Glenn Hubbard, Dean, Columbia Business School, and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
  • “…a very valuable contribution.” - Larry Summers, former Secretary of the Treasury and director of the National Economic Council, president emeritus, Harvard University
  • “Unintended Consequences is full of substance, it is one of the must-read books of the year, and once I finish it I will be giving it a second read through right away.” - Tyler Cowen, Professor, George Mason University
  • “A full-throated defense of economic dynamism.” - The Wall Street Journal
  • “Unintended Consequences should be read by anyone who takes for granted the superiority of progressive taxation and has not thought carefully about the trade-offs involved.” - The New Republic
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
  • “Unintended Consequences offers deep and well-argued analyses on almost every issue.” - The New York Times
  • “…a comprehensive explanation of the modern economy.” - Julian Robertson, Founder, Tiger Management
  • “…a must-read for serious students of economic policy.” - Glenn Hubbard, Dean, Columbia Business School, and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • “…challenges misconceptions that distort our economic debates.” - Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute
Upside of Inequality Oxford Unintended Consequences
Buy the Books
  • Macro Roundup
  • About Roundup
  • About Ed Conard
  • Highlights
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
Edward Conard
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • youtube

Are Tough Credit Standards Slowing the Recovery?

The purpose of banking is to put risk-averse savings to work. If corn sits in the silos unused, rather than being planted or consumed, employment and/or wage growth slows relative to what would have been the case if the economy had fully deployed all its resources. But loaning out the corn and leaving the silos empty is inherently unstable. If real estate prices fall 30% and risk-averse savers run to the silos to withdraw their corn, banks cannot sell their loan portfolio at high enough prices to fund withdrawals. Depositors logically race each other en masse to withdraw their corn.

We must hold banks accountable for loans losses, otherwise they will make bad loans. But if we hold banks responsible for withdrawals, they have no choice but to leave corn in the silo available for withdrawals. If they do that, growth slows just as it has.

Luckily there is a low cost alternative: the Fed can print money (IOU corn) to fund withdrawals in a panic, and burn the money when the panic subsides and deposits return to the banks for safekeeping. Contrary to popular perception, the U.S. government made a profit guaranteeing bank deposits in the worst financial panic since the 1930s.

US Mortgage

Unfortunately, the Fed never burned the money when the panic subsided. So far, the excess money has sat unused creating neither growth, as the Fed expected, nor inflation, as some conservatives expected.

To the extent loan losses cause a run on a bank, the Fed can inflict those losses on the bank when the losses are actually incurred—often years after a panic. Rather than do so, the Fed tried to hastily assess and inflict losses on banks in the epicenter of the panic, long before it knew what losses would actually be incurred. This mistake by the Fed did a lot more harm than good. It turns out senior bank loans suffered surprising small losses, perhaps 3%, far smaller than the equity cushion held by banks.

Regulations and capital cushions have now reduced the risk of loan loss and withdrawals that taxpayers, namely rich taxpayers, bear through their implicit guarantees of banks. Pushing this risk onto banks has left risk-averse savings sitting unlent. And banks have pushed this risk onto their customers—homeowners—by raising credit standards to reduce risk. As a result, all but the most creditworthy homeowners have been denied the value of credit. With corn left in the silos, employment and wages growth has slowed substantially.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
© Copyright 2026 Coherent Research Institute · All Rights Reserved · Privacy · Terms