Edward Conard

Top Ten New York Times Bestselling Author

Upside of Inequality Unintended Consequences
  • “…a fresh argument for the productive value of inequality.” - David Autor, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Macro Roundup
  • Highlights
  • Blog
  • OpEds
  • Reviews
  • About
    • About the Author
    • About the Books
    • Read Excerpts
    • Read the Reviews
    • Debates
    • Media and TV
  • Topics
    • All Media Appearances
    • Productivity
    • Monetary Policy
    • Banking
    • Politics
    • Upside endnotes
    • Stuff Ed’s Assistant Thought He Might Like
  • Contact
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • youtube
  • linkedin
  • Advanced SearchChoose Categories To Search Within
    • Close Advanced Search

Advanced Search

Ed Defeats Motion “Income Inequality Impairs the American Dream of Upward Mobility.”

Despite a highly partisan crowd of voters, Ed defeats the IQ2 Motion: “Income Inequality Impairs the American Dream of Upward Mobility.”  Thirty percent of the voters moved to Ed’s side of the motion—one of the largest swings in the history of IQ2. Here and below are Ed’s opening and closing remarks.

Against the IQ2 Motion “Income Inequality Impairs the American Dream of Upward Mobility”:

If income inequality truly impaired mobility, there would be telltale signs:

  • Growing inequality would have reduced mobility. It hasn’t. Even Emanuel Saez, of the liberal Piketty and Saez duo, admits, the chance of a low-income child reaching any higher level of income has increased.
  • Economies with more equally distributed incomes would have greater mobility. They don’t. Even Miles Corak, whose findings the Obama Admiration claimed underpinned their infamous “Great Gatsby Curve,” admits, there are “almost no differences in upward mobility between Canada, Sweden, and the U.S.”
  • Transferring more money to the poor would increase mobility. It hasn’t.
  • Spending more money on education would increase test scores. It hasn’t.

We may not know how to increase mobility, but we do know that growing prosperity raises the living standards of the poor.

This isn’t really a debate about whether inequality impairs mobility. It’s really about whether the success of America’s top-earners hurts the middle and working class.

Our opponents see the economy as a pie to be divided. Read More→

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
Mohamed El-Erian joins Elise Gould to continue yesterday's IQ2 debate: Does income inequality impair upward mobility?
Mohamed El-Erian joins Elise Gould to continue yesterday’s IQ2 debate: Does income inequality impair upward mobility?
Ed Conard on Fareed Zakaria
Ed Conard on Fareed Zakaria
Ed Conard debates Austan Goolsbee at the Center for American Progress
Ed Conard debates Austan Goolsbee at the Center for American Progress

© Copyright 2023 Coherent Research Institute · All Rights Reserved